Patient-centered research priorities in ovarian cancer: A systematic review of potential determinants of guideline care

被引:19
|
作者
Pozzar, Rachel A. [1 ,2 ]
Berry, Donna L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Phyllis F Cantor Ctr Res Nursing & Patient Care S, 450 Brookline Ave,LW 518, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Ovarian neoplasms; Guideline adherence; Decision making; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; TREATMENT PREFERENCES; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; WOMENS PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION NEEDS; ADHERENCE; QUALITY; EXPERIENCES; DISPARITIES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To (a) determine what is known about the individual and contextual factors that may influence whether a woman with ovarian cancer receives guideline care, and (b) identify patient-centered research priorities in ovarian cancer. Methods. A systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, and Psyclnfo online databases. Eligible articles were published in English, described original research, and either (a) identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline care for ovarian cancer, or (b) described treatment decision making by women with ovarian cancer. Studies were excluded in which women with ovarian cancer did not comprise the entire sample of patient participants. Data were collected in accordance with Garrard's Matrix Method. Study quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool for evaluating primary research papers. Relevant study findings were imported into NVivo Pro 11 for qualitative synthesis. Results. The search strategy yielded 502 unique citations, of which 78 full-text articles were reviewed. Thirty-three articles met the criteria for inclusion. Study quality was high overall. Factors associated with the receipt of guideline care included race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance type, age, comorbidity, disease stage, tumor characteristics, hospital volume, hospital type, physician volume, and geographic location. Influences on treatment decision making among women with ovarian cancer included the desire to prolong survival, the patient-provider relationship, perceived ability to participate in the treatment decision, values and preferences, information needs, side effects, cost of care, and past experiences with chemotherapy. Conclusions. There is a need for further research that examines ovarian cancer treatment decision making from the perspective of the patient. Priority topics for future research may include the experiences of diverse women receiving treatment for ovarian cancer and the role of shared decision making with providers, referral networks, and practice patterns in the delivery of guideline care. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 722
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Potential of Crowdsourcing to Improve Patient-Centered Care
    Michael Weiner
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7 : 123 - 127
  • [22] THE PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOME, A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Jackson, George
    Bettger, Janet
    Powers, Benjamin
    Kemper, Alex
    Dolor, Rowena
    Williams, John
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S325 - S326
  • [23] Patient-Centered Medical Home A Systematic Review
    Jackson, George L.
    Powers, Benjamin J.
    Chatterjee, Ranee
    Bettger, Janet Prvu
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Irvine, Julian
    Heidenfelder, Brooke L.
    Kendrick, Amy S.
    Gray, Rebecca
    Williams, John W., Jr.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (03) : 169 - +
  • [24] The Potential of Crowdsourcing to Improve Patient-Centered Care
    Weiner, Michael
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02): : 123 - 127
  • [25] Agenda for patient-centered care research in Brazil
    da Silva de Queiroz Rodrigues, Juliana Loureiro
    Portela, Margareth Crisostomo
    Malik, Ana Maria
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (11): : 4263 - 4273
  • [26] Patient-centered outcomes for gastrointestinal cancer care: a scoping review protocol
    Yang, Joanna
    Barabash, Tori
    Rajendran, Luckshi
    Mahar, Alyson L.
    Hsu, Amy T.
    James, Paul D.
    Gotlib Conn, Lesley
    Wright, Frances C.
    Ludwig, Claire
    Kosyachkova, Ekaterina
    Deleemans, Julie
    Coburn, Natalie G.
    Hallet, Julie
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [27] A systematic review of vertical integration and quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes
    Machta, Rachel M.
    Maurer, Kristin A.
    Jones, David J.
    Furukawa, Michael F.
    Rich, Eugene C.
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 44 (02) : 159 - 173
  • [28] Patient-Centered Approaches to Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    McMillan, Sara S.
    Kendall, Elizabeth
    Sav, Adem
    King, Michelle A.
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Kelly, Fiona
    Wheeler, Amanda J.
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2013, 70 (06) : 567 - 596
  • [29] Is Technology Present in Patient-Centered Care Frameworks and Approaches? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Lourimi, Noureddine
    Elkefi, Safa
    Bhar, Safa Layeb
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES, ICASET 2024, 2024,
  • [30] A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Thomas W. Concannon
    Melissa Fuster
    Tully Saunders
    Kamal Patel
    John B. Wong
    Laurel K. Leslie
    Joseph Lau
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2014, 29 : 1692 - 1701