Patient-centered research priorities in ovarian cancer: A systematic review of potential determinants of guideline care

被引:19
|
作者
Pozzar, Rachel A. [1 ,2 ]
Berry, Donna L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Phyllis F Cantor Ctr Res Nursing & Patient Care S, 450 Brookline Ave,LW 518, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Ovarian neoplasms; Guideline adherence; Decision making; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; TREATMENT PREFERENCES; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; WOMENS PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION NEEDS; ADHERENCE; QUALITY; EXPERIENCES; DISPARITIES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To (a) determine what is known about the individual and contextual factors that may influence whether a woman with ovarian cancer receives guideline care, and (b) identify patient-centered research priorities in ovarian cancer. Methods. A systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, and Psyclnfo online databases. Eligible articles were published in English, described original research, and either (a) identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline care for ovarian cancer, or (b) described treatment decision making by women with ovarian cancer. Studies were excluded in which women with ovarian cancer did not comprise the entire sample of patient participants. Data were collected in accordance with Garrard's Matrix Method. Study quality was evaluated using the QualSyst tool for evaluating primary research papers. Relevant study findings were imported into NVivo Pro 11 for qualitative synthesis. Results. The search strategy yielded 502 unique citations, of which 78 full-text articles were reviewed. Thirty-three articles met the criteria for inclusion. Study quality was high overall. Factors associated with the receipt of guideline care included race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance type, age, comorbidity, disease stage, tumor characteristics, hospital volume, hospital type, physician volume, and geographic location. Influences on treatment decision making among women with ovarian cancer included the desire to prolong survival, the patient-provider relationship, perceived ability to participate in the treatment decision, values and preferences, information needs, side effects, cost of care, and past experiences with chemotherapy. Conclusions. There is a need for further research that examines ovarian cancer treatment decision making from the perspective of the patient. Priority topics for future research may include the experiences of diverse women receiving treatment for ovarian cancer and the role of shared decision making with providers, referral networks, and practice patterns in the delivery of guideline care. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 722
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-centered interprofessional education in cancer care: a systematic scoping review
    Fragner, Tobias
    Hama, Honja
    Serifovic, Adis
    Kirchheiner, Kathrin
    Grabovac, Igor
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Patient-Centered Care and Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Rathert, Cheryl
    Wyrwich, Mary D.
    Boren, Suzanne Austin
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2013, 70 (04) : 351 - 379
  • [3] Determinants and outcomes of patient-centered care
    Bertakis, Klea D.
    Azari, Rahman
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 85 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [4] Combining personalised medicine and patient-centered care in breast cancer: a systematic review
    Castagna, C.
    Pellegrino, R.
    Morsella, A.
    Boccia, S.
    Pastorino, R.
    De Belvis, A. G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31 : 27 - 27
  • [6] Patient-driven research priorities for patient-centered measurement
    Howard, A. Fuchsia
    Warner, Linda
    Cuthbertson, Lena
    Sawatzky, Richard
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [7] US Patient-Centered Research Priorities and Roadmap for Bronchiectasis
    Henkle, Emily
    Aksamit, Timothy R.
    Daley, Charles L.
    Griffith, David E.
    O'Donnell, Anne E.
    Quittner, Alexandra L.
    Malanga, Elisha
    Prieto, Delia
    Leitman, Amy
    Winthrop, Kevin L.
    CHEST, 2018, 154 (05) : 1016 - 1023
  • [8] Defining patient-centered research priorities in pediatric dermatology
    Neale, Holly
    Schrandt, Suz
    Abbott, Becky M.
    Austin, Jennifer
    Brand, Callista
    Camp, Karen
    Devenport, Katherine
    Hall, Michelle
    Isbell, Lauren
    Miciano, Charlene
    Pry, Sarah
    Quinn, Paula
    Rittle, James
    Tenconi, Francesca
    Terrell, Julia
    Weiss, Meredith
    Zavitz, Sam
    Siegel, Michael
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (02) : 250 - 257
  • [9] Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: A literature review and the development of a systematic approach
    McCormack, Lauren A.
    Treiman, Katherine
    Rupert, Douglas
    Williams-Piehota, Pamela
    Nadler, Eric
    Arora, Neeraj K.
    Lawrence, William
    Street, Richard L., Jr.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2011, 72 (07) : 1085 - 1095
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT OF PATIENT-CENTERED BLADDER CANCER RESEARCH PRIORITIES VIA ENGAGEMENT WITH PATIENTS
    Rose, Alexa
    Love, Jasmine
    Borza, Tudor
    Downs, Tracy M.
    Abel, E. Jason
    Jarrard, David F.
    Richards, Kyle A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E990 - E990