Skin punch biopsy sectioning: before or after tissue processing?

被引:0
|
作者
Sungu, Nuran [1 ]
Yavuz, Sibel [2 ]
Marali, Seda [2 ]
Balci, Serdar [1 ]
Kilicarslan, Aydan [1 ]
Altunkaya, Canan [3 ]
Dogan, Hayriye Tatli [2 ]
Guler, Gulnur [4 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Ataturk Training & Res Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Kirikkale Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
dermatopathology; microscopy; punch biopsy formalin fixation; skin;
D O I
10.1111/cup.12790
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe intended to study whether there is a meaningful difference in microscopic examination between dividing a biopsy section into two equal parts before tissue processing (first method) or after (second method). MethodsA total of 400 cases were included in the study. Punch biopsies (PB) were cut into two pieces using the first method in 200 cases and just before paraffin embedding in another 200 cases using the second method. We microscopically evaluated the epidermal mesh view, the presence of a cross-cut hair follicle and bow shape because of epidermal angling, the presence of two pieces on the slide and if there was a difference of >2 mm between the parts, and the number of new sections and new slides. ResultsCross-cut hair follicle (p = 0.018), epidermal mesh view (p = 0.036), difference of >2 mm between the parts (p = 0.008), the number of new sections (p < 0.001) and new slides (p < 0.001) were considerably higher when the first method was used compared with the second method. The presence of two pieces was less (p < 0.001) when using the first method. ConclusionsWe noted a meaningful difference in the quality of microscopic evaluation between the first and second methods. Better sections were obtained with the second method. In addition, the decrease in the number of new slides will reduce workload, archival work and cost.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 988
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design of a Novel Elliptical Skin Biopsy Punch Device
    Weiner, David
    Wainwright, Matthew
    Tacvorian, Edward
    Hall, Derek
    Gaudette, Glenn
    Dunn, Raymond
    2009 35TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2009, : 296 - +
  • [22] Inflammatory breast cancer and the importance of skin punch biopsy
    Valente, Stephanie A.
    ElSherif, Ayat
    Tran, Jennifer
    Tu, Chao
    Kruse, Megan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 225 (03): : 549 - 552
  • [23] PUNCH BIOPSY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF PIGMENTED SKIN-LESIONS
    THOMPSON, JM
    TEMPLE, WJ
    LAFRENIERE, R
    JERRY, LM
    ASHLEY, P
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1988, 37 (06) : 123 - 126
  • [24] Skin biopsy for peripheral neuropathy Is it better to punch or to blister?
    Klein, Caroline M.
    Dyck, Peter J.
    NEUROLOGY, 2009, 72 (14) : 1200 - 1201
  • [25] QUANTITATION OF INTRAEPIDERMAL NERVES IN SENSORY NEUROPATHIES AND AFTER NERVE TRANSECTION USING PUNCH SKIN BIOPSY
    MCARTHUR, JC
    HSIEH, ST
    MCCARTHY, B
    STOCKS, A
    FOX, R
    GRIFFIN, JW
    NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (04) : A275 - A275
  • [26] Devices for percutaneous Access and Tissue Sampling in the Punch Biopsy
    Fricke, A.
    Hauschild, K.
    Berger, M.
    Speicher, T.
    Heske, T.
    BEWEGUNGSTECHNIK 2018: INNOVATIONEN, METHODEN, KONZEPTE & APPLIKATIONEN, 2018, 2331 : 177 - 189
  • [27] Melanoma Tumor Seeding After Punch Biopsy
    Lin, Steven Wai
    Kaye, Valda
    Goldfarb, Noah
    Rawal, Ajay
    Warshaw, Erin
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2012, 38 (07) : 1083 - 1085
  • [28] ANGIOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIES AFTER PUNCH BIOPSY OF LIVER
    CREMNITER, D
    CHATEL, A
    BIGOT, JM
    LACOMBE, P
    HELENON, C
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE D ELECTROLOGIE ET DE MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE, 1978, 59 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [29] Punch biopsy of the skin: Management and usual practice in breast imaging
    Geffroy, Delphine
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2021, 31 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [30] The usefulness of a skin biopsy punch to remove sea urchin spines
    Sjoberg, Thomas
    de Weerd, Louis
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (05) : 383 - 383