Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference

被引:64
|
作者
Nogueira, Ana Rita [1 ,2 ]
Pugnana, Andrea [3 ]
Ruggieri, Salvatore [4 ]
Pedreschi, Dino [4 ]
Gama, Joao [1 ]
机构
[1] INESC TEC, LIAAD, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Ciencias, PDCC, Porto, Portugal
[3] Scuola Normale Super Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[4] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
关键词
causal discovery; causal inference; causality; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; SYNTHETIC CONTROL METHODS; PROPENSITY SCORE; R PACKAGE; EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; SELECTION; IDENTIFICATION; EMPLOYMENT; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1002/widm.1449
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Causality is a complex concept, which roots its developments across several fields, such as statistics, economics, epidemiology, computer science, and philosophy. In recent years, the study of causal relationships has become a crucial part of the Artificial Intelligence community, as causality can be a key tool for overcoming some limitations of correlation-based Machine Learning systems. Causality research can generally be divided into two main branches, that is, causal discovery and causal inference. The former focuses on obtaining causal knowledge directly from observational data. The latter aims to estimate the impact deriving from a change of a certain variable over an outcome of interest. This article aims at covering several methodologies that have been developed for both tasks. This survey does not only focus on theoretical aspects. But also provides a practical toolkit for interested researchers and practitioners, including software, datasets, and running examples. This article is categorized under: Algorithmic Development > Causality Discovery Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Explainable AI Technologies > Machine Learning
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BayesDAG: Gradient-Based Posterior Inference for Causal Discovery
    KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    不详
    不详
    不详
    [J]. arXiv,
  • [42] Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research
    Gelman, Andrew
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03) : 955 - 966
  • [43] Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research
    Weber, Erik
    Leuridan, Bert
    [J]. HISTORICAL METHODS, 2008, 41 (04): : 197 - 201
  • [44] ASSESSING STATISTICAL METHODS FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE IN OBSERVATIONAL DATA
    Parks, D. C.
    Lin, X.
    Lee, K. R.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A731 - A731
  • [45] MIXTURE MODELING METHODS FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE WITH MULTILEVEL DATA
    Kim, Jee-Seon
    Steiner, Peter M.
    Lim, Wen-Chiang
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MULTILEVEL MODELING FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: ADDRESSING PRACTICAL ISSUES FOUND IN REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS, 2016, : 335 - 359
  • [46] Causal Inference Methods and their Challenges: The Case of 311 Data
    Yusuf, Farzana Beente
    Cheng, Shaoming
    Ganapati, Sukumar
    Narasimhan, Giri
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2021, 2021, : 49 - 59
  • [47] Evaluating Uses of Deep Learning Methods for Causal Inference
    Whata, Albert
    Chimedza, Charles
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 2813 - 2827
  • [48] Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research
    Fox, John
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY-CAHIERS CANADIENS DE SOCIOLOGIE, 2008, 33 (02): : 432 - 435
  • [49] A Theory of Statistical Inference for Matching Methods in Causal Research
    Iacus, Stefano M.
    King, Gary
    Porro, Giuseppe
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 27 (01) : 46 - 68
  • [50] Comment: Strengthening Empirical Evaluation of Causal Inference Methods
    Jensen, David
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 34 (01) : 77 - 81