Anatomical Considerations for Subaxial (C2) Pedicle Screw Placement A Radiographic Study With Computed Tomography in 93 Patients

被引:30
|
作者
Smith, Zachary A. [1 ,2 ]
Bistazzoni, Simona [1 ,2 ]
Onibokun, Adebukoa [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Nan-Fu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sassi, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Khoo, Larry T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Santa Monica Spine Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Kaohsiung Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
来源
关键词
axis; C2; pedicle; computed tomography; FIXATION; AXIS; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b40234
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Radiographic study. Objective: More detailed anatomical knowledge of the C2 pedicle is required to optimize and minimize the risk of screw placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the linear and angular dimensions of the true C2 pedicle using axial computed tomography. Background Data: Although earlier studies have analyzed the anatomy of the C2 pars interarticularis, little attention has been focused on the dimensions of the C2 pedicle. Methods: Ninety-three patients (47 males, 46 females; mean age 48.4 y) who had previous cervical spinal computed tomography imaging were evaluated for this study. Axial images of the C2 pedicle were selected and the following pedicle parameters were determined: pedicle width (the mediolateral diameter of the pedicle isthmus, perpendicular to the pedicle axis) and pedicle transverse angle (PTA, ie, the angle between the pedicle axis and the midline of the vertebral body). Results: The overall mean pedicle width was 5.8 +/- 1.2 mm. The mean pedicle width in male patients (6.0 +/- 1.3 mm) was greater than that in the female patients (5.6 +/- 1.1 mm). This difference was not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.679). The overall mean PTA was 43.9 +/- 3.9 degrees. The mean PTA in male patients was 43.2 +/- 3.8 degrees, whereas that in female patients was 44.7 +/- 3.7 degrees. Conclusions: Given the significant variability in pedicle widths and the need for precise trajectory planning in pedicle cannulation, preoperative planning is absolutely mandatory. A significant percentage of patients have pedicle widths that may not accommodate screw fixation. In addition, the angle of entry into the C2 pedicle must be carefully measured for safe instrumentation at this level.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 179
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The options of C2 fixation for os odontoideum: a radiographic study for the C2 pedicle and lamina anatomy
    Meng, Xian-zhong
    Xu, Jia-xin
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (11) : 1921 - 1927
  • [42] The options of C2 fixation for os odontoideum: a radiographic study for the C2 pedicle and lamina anatomy
    Xian-zhong Meng
    Jia-xin Xu
    European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 1921 - 1927
  • [43] Radiographic and clinical assessment on the accuracy and complications of C1 anterior lateral mass and C2 anterior pedicle screw placement in the TARP-III procedure: a study of 106 patients
    Li, Xueshi
    Ai, Fuzhi
    Xia, Hong
    Wu, Zenghui
    Ma, Xiangyang
    Yin, Qingshui
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (08) : 1712 - 1719
  • [44] Radiographic and clinical assessment on the accuracy and complications of C1 anterior lateral mass and C2 anterior pedicle screw placement in the TARP-III procedure: a study of 106 patients
    Xueshi Li
    Fuzhi Ai
    Hong Xia
    Zenghui Wu
    Xiangyang Ma
    Qingshui Yin
    European Spine Journal, 2014, 23 : 1712 - 1719
  • [45] Morphometric Analysis of C2 Pedicle in 247 Patients and Proposal for Trajectory and Size of Pedicle Screw
    Agrawal, Mohit
    Devarajan, Leve J.
    Dharanipathy, Sundarakrishnan
    Katiyar, Varidh
    Singh, Pankaj K.
    Garg, Ajay
    Chandra, P. Sarat
    Kale, Shashank S.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2021, 69 (04) : 925 - 930
  • [46] Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement
    Dean, Clayton L.
    Lee, Michael J.
    Robbin, Mark
    Cassinelli, Ezequiel H.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (03): : 258 - 262
  • [47] In Reply to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Proposal of a New Safety Margin for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws on Computed Tomography Angiography"
    Agrawal, Mohit
    Singh, Pankaj Kumar
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 135
  • [48] Evaluation of Correction of Radiologic Parameters (Angulation and Displacement) and Accuracy of C2 Pedicle Screw Placement in Unstable Hangman's Fracture with Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation
    Singh, Pankaj Kumar
    Verma, Satish K.
    Garg, Mayank
    Sawarkar, Dattaraj P.
    Kumar, Amandeep
    Agrawal, Deepak
    Chandra, Sarat P.
    Kale, Shashank S.
    Sharma, Bhawani S.
    Mahapatra, Ashok K.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 107 : 795 - 802
  • [49] TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS FOR C2 SCREW PLACEMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS
    Astolfi, Rodrigo Schroll
    Tachibana, Wilson Tadao
    Letaif, Olavo Biraghi
    Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
    Oliveira, Reginaldo Perilo
    Pessoa de Barros Filho, Tarcisio Eloy
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 20 (04): : 207 - 209
  • [50] Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azimi, Parisa
    Yazdanian, Taravat
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Aghaei, Hossein Nayeb
    Azhari, Shirzad
    Sadeghi, Sohrab
    Montazeri, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)