Anatomical Considerations for Subaxial (C2) Pedicle Screw Placement A Radiographic Study With Computed Tomography in 93 Patients

被引:30
|
作者
Smith, Zachary A. [1 ,2 ]
Bistazzoni, Simona [1 ,2 ]
Onibokun, Adebukoa [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Nan-Fu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sassi, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Khoo, Larry T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Santa Monica Spine Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Kaohsiung Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
来源
关键词
axis; C2; pedicle; computed tomography; FIXATION; AXIS; FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b40234
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Radiographic study. Objective: More detailed anatomical knowledge of the C2 pedicle is required to optimize and minimize the risk of screw placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the linear and angular dimensions of the true C2 pedicle using axial computed tomography. Background Data: Although earlier studies have analyzed the anatomy of the C2 pars interarticularis, little attention has been focused on the dimensions of the C2 pedicle. Methods: Ninety-three patients (47 males, 46 females; mean age 48.4 y) who had previous cervical spinal computed tomography imaging were evaluated for this study. Axial images of the C2 pedicle were selected and the following pedicle parameters were determined: pedicle width (the mediolateral diameter of the pedicle isthmus, perpendicular to the pedicle axis) and pedicle transverse angle (PTA, ie, the angle between the pedicle axis and the midline of the vertebral body). Results: The overall mean pedicle width was 5.8 +/- 1.2 mm. The mean pedicle width in male patients (6.0 +/- 1.3 mm) was greater than that in the female patients (5.6 +/- 1.1 mm). This difference was not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.679). The overall mean PTA was 43.9 +/- 3.9 degrees. The mean PTA in male patients was 43.2 +/- 3.8 degrees, whereas that in female patients was 44.7 +/- 3.7 degrees. Conclusions: Given the significant variability in pedicle widths and the need for precise trajectory planning in pedicle cannulation, preoperative planning is absolutely mandatory. A significant percentage of patients have pedicle widths that may not accommodate screw fixation. In addition, the angle of entry into the C2 pedicle must be carefully measured for safe instrumentation at this level.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 179
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
    Wu, YueLin
    Liang, ZhaoQuan
    Bao, JunHao
    Wen, Ling
    Zhang, Li
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [32] Morphology analysis of the C2 pediculoisthmic component and feasibility of safe C2 pedicle screw placement: comparison of multiplanar reconstruction versus traditional radiographic methods
    YueLin Wu
    ZhaoQuan Liang
    JunHao Bao
    Ling Wen
    Li Zhang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [33] The summit of the isthmic crest of the axis as a new entry point for C2 pedicle screw: an anatomical study
    Beucler, Nathan
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [34] Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination
    Xiao, Ruipei
    Hou, Juedong
    Zhou, Yang
    Zheng, Jintao
    Zou, Xiaobao
    Zhu, Yongjian
    Yao, Ling
    Ma, Xiangyang
    Chen, Jianting
    Yang, Jincheng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (10) : 2684 - 2692
  • [35] Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination
    Ruipei Xiao
    Juedong Hou
    Yang Zhou
    Jintao Zheng
    Xiaobao Zou
    Yongjian Zhu
    Ling Yao
    Xiangyang Ma
    Jianting Chen
    Jincheng Yang
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 2684 - 2692
  • [36] Evaluation of C2 pedicle screw placement via the freehand technique by neurosurgical trainees
    Pham, Martin H.
    Bakhsheshian, Joshua
    Reid, Patrick C.
    Buchanan, Ian A.
    Fredrickson, Vance L.
    Liu, John C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [37] Safety and accuracy of freehand versus navigated C2 pars or pedicle screw placement
    Hlubek, Randall J.
    Bohl, Michael A.
    Cole, Tyler S.
    Morgan, Clinton D.
    Xu, David S.
    Chang, Steve W.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Kakarla, U. Kumar
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (08): : 1374 - 1381
  • [38] Ideal entry point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement in basilar invagination patients with high-riding vertebral artery based on 3D computed tomography
    Zhou, Lu-Ping
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Jiang, Zhen-Fei
    Tao, Er-Xu
    Shang, Jin
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (08): : 1281 - 1291
  • [39] Determining Optimal C2 Pedicle Screw Placement and Length in Patients with Axis Traumatic Spondylolisthesis: A Case Series
    El Hawary, Magdy Assaad
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 3 (02) : 63 - 68
  • [40] Letter to the Editor Regarding "Proposal of a New Safety Margin for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws on Computed Tomography Angiography"
    Chytas, Dimitrios
    Korres, Demetrios S.
    Babis, George C.
    Chronopoulos, Efstathios
    Kaseta, Maria-Kyriaki
    Markatos, Konstantinos
    Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 135