First trimester combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age - a single centre experience and validation of the FMF screening algorithm

被引:24
|
作者
Beatrice, Mosimann [1 ]
Chantal, Pfiffner [2 ]
Sofia, Amylidi-Mohr [1 ]
Lorenz, Risch [3 ]
Daniel, Surbek [1 ]
Luigi, Raio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Lab Med Zentrum Dr Risch, Div Clin Chem, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
preeclampsia; screening; small for gestational age; first trimester; LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; GROWTH RESTRICTION; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; PREGNANCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4414/smw.2017.14498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIM OF THE STUDY: Preeclampsia (PE) is associated with severe maternal and fetal morbidity in the acute presentation and there is increasing evidence that it is also an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease later in life. Therefore, preventive strategies are of utmost importance. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) London recently developed a first trimester screening algorithm for placentarelated pregnancy complications, in particular early onset preeclampsia (eoPE) requiring delivery before 34 weeks, and preterm small for gestational age (pSGA), with a birth weight <5th percentile and delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, based on maternal history and characteristics, and biochemical and biophysical parameters. The aim of this study was to test the performance of this algorithm in our setting and to perform an external validation of the screening algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 2013 and April 2016, all consecutive women with singleton pregnancies who agreed to this screening were included in the study. The proposed cut-offs of >= 1:200 for eoPE, and >= 1:150 for pSGA were applied. Risk calculations were performed with Viewpoint (R) program (GE, Mountainview, CA, USA) and statistical analysis with GraphPad version 5.0 for Windows. RESULTS: 1372 women agreed to PE screening; the 1129 with complete data and a live birth were included in this study. Nineteen (1.68%) developed PE: 14 (1.24%) at term (tPE) and 5 (0.44%) preterm (pPE, <37 weeks), including 2 (0.18%) with eoPE. Overall, 97/1129 (8.6%) screened positive for eoPE, including both pregnancies that resulted in eoPE and 4/5 (80%) that resulted in pPE. Forty-nine of 1110 (4.41%) pregnancies without PE resulted in SGA, 3 (0.27%) of them in pSGA. A total of 210/1110 (18.9%) non-PE pregnancies screened positive for pSGA, including 2/3 (66.7%) of the pSGA deliveries and 18/46 (39.1%) of term SGA infants. CONCLUSION: Our results show that first trimester PE screening in our population performs well and according to expectations, whereas screening for SGA is associated with a high false positive rate.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of screening performance of first trimester competing risk prediction model for small for gestational age in Asian population
    Nguyen-Hoang, L.
    Papastefanou, I.
    Sahota, D. S.
    Wah, Y.
    Pooh, R. K.
    Zheng, M.
    Ma, R.
    Chaiyasit, N.
    Tokunaka, M.
    Shaw, S.
    Seshadri, S.
    Choolani, M.
    Panchalee, T.
    Yapan, P.
    Sim, W.
    Sekizawa, A.
    Saito, S.
    Poon, L. C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 82 - 82
  • [32] Validation of First Trimester Combined Prenatal Screening for Twin Gestations in Northern Alberta
    Brun, Miranda
    Wolan, Vanessa
    Pastuck, Melanie
    Yuen-Jung, Jolene
    Schnabl, Kareena
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 86 : 77 - 77
  • [33] Estimating the effect of gestational age on test performance of combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a preliminary study
    van Heesch, Peter N.
    Struijk, Pieter C.
    Laudy, Jaqueline A. M.
    Steegers, Eric A. P.
    Wildschut, Hajo I. J.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [34] Prospective Validation of First-Trimester Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women (PREDICTION Study)
    Guerby, Paul
    Audibert, Francois
    Johnson, Jo-Ann
    Okun, Nanette
    Giguere, Yves
    Forest, Jean-Claude
    Chaillet, Nils
    Masse, Benoit
    Wright, David
    Ghesquiere, Louise
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    HYPERTENSION, 2024, 81 (07) : 1574 - 1582
  • [35] Differential performance of first-trimester screening in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonate or fetal growth restriction
    Crovetto, F.
    Triunfo, S.
    Crispi, F.
    Rodriguez-Sureda, V.
    Dominguez, C.
    Figueras, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 349 - 356
  • [36] First-Trimester Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction and Small-for-Gestational-Age Pregnancies without Preeclampsia Using Cardiovascular Disease-Associated MicroRNA Biomarkers
    Hromadnikova, Ilona
    Kotlabova, Katerina
    Krofta, Ladislav
    BIOMEDICINES, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [37] Impact on obstetric outcome of third-trimester screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Callec, R.
    Lamy, C.
    Perdriolle-Galet, E.
    Patte, C.
    Heude, B.
    Morel, O.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (02) : 216 - 220
  • [38] Diagnosing Small for Gestational Age during second trimester routine screening: Early sonographic clues
    Fatihoglu, Erdem
    Aydin, Sonay
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (02): : 287 - 292
  • [39] Effect of routine first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia on small-for-gestational-age birth: secondary interrupted time series analysis
    Guy, G. P.
    Leslie, K.
    Gomez, D. Diaz
    Forenc, K.
    Buck, E.
    Bhide, A.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [40] First trimester screening of maternal placental protein 13 for predicting preeclampsia and small for gestational age: In-house study and systematic review (vol 33, pg 735, 2012)
    Schneuer, F. J.
    Nassar, N.
    Khambalia, A. Z.
    Tasevski, V.
    Guilbert, C.
    Ashton, A. W.
    Morris, J. M.
    Roberts, C. L.
    PLACENTA, 2012, 33 (11) : 957 - 957