First trimester combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age - a single centre experience and validation of the FMF screening algorithm

被引:24
|
作者
Beatrice, Mosimann [1 ]
Chantal, Pfiffner [2 ]
Sofia, Amylidi-Mohr [1 ]
Lorenz, Risch [3 ]
Daniel, Surbek [1 ]
Luigi, Raio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Lab Med Zentrum Dr Risch, Div Clin Chem, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
preeclampsia; screening; small for gestational age; first trimester; LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; GROWTH RESTRICTION; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; PREGNANCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4414/smw.2017.14498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIM OF THE STUDY: Preeclampsia (PE) is associated with severe maternal and fetal morbidity in the acute presentation and there is increasing evidence that it is also an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease later in life. Therefore, preventive strategies are of utmost importance. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) London recently developed a first trimester screening algorithm for placentarelated pregnancy complications, in particular early onset preeclampsia (eoPE) requiring delivery before 34 weeks, and preterm small for gestational age (pSGA), with a birth weight <5th percentile and delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, based on maternal history and characteristics, and biochemical and biophysical parameters. The aim of this study was to test the performance of this algorithm in our setting and to perform an external validation of the screening algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 2013 and April 2016, all consecutive women with singleton pregnancies who agreed to this screening were included in the study. The proposed cut-offs of >= 1:200 for eoPE, and >= 1:150 for pSGA were applied. Risk calculations were performed with Viewpoint (R) program (GE, Mountainview, CA, USA) and statistical analysis with GraphPad version 5.0 for Windows. RESULTS: 1372 women agreed to PE screening; the 1129 with complete data and a live birth were included in this study. Nineteen (1.68%) developed PE: 14 (1.24%) at term (tPE) and 5 (0.44%) preterm (pPE, <37 weeks), including 2 (0.18%) with eoPE. Overall, 97/1129 (8.6%) screened positive for eoPE, including both pregnancies that resulted in eoPE and 4/5 (80%) that resulted in pPE. Forty-nine of 1110 (4.41%) pregnancies without PE resulted in SGA, 3 (0.27%) of them in pSGA. A total of 210/1110 (18.9%) non-PE pregnancies screened positive for pSGA, including 2/3 (66.7%) of the pSGA deliveries and 18/46 (39.1%) of term SGA infants. CONCLUSION: Our results show that first trimester PE screening in our population performs well and according to expectations, whereas screening for SGA is associated with a high false positive rate.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Developing a new algorithm for first and second trimester preeclampsia screening in twin pregnancies
    Maymon, Ron
    Trahtenherts, Alla
    Svirsky, Ran
    Melcer, Yaakov
    Madar-Shapiro, Liora
    Klog, Esther
    Meiri, Hamutal
    Cuckle, Howard
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2017, 36 (01) : 108 - 115
  • [22] First trimester screening - A new algorithm for risk calculation of chromosomal anomalies developed by FMF Germany
    Merz, E.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2007, 28 (03): : 270 - 272
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy of the Gaussian first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia to predict small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Mendoza, Manel
    Serrano, Berta
    Bonacina, Erika
    Capote, Sira
    Garcia-Manau, Pablo
    Regincos, Laia
    Murcia, Maria Teresa
    Barberan, Lidia
    Miguez, Marta
    Carreras, Elena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 156 (02) : 322 - 330
  • [24] Implementation of routine first-trimester combined screening for preeclampsia based on the Gaussian algorithm: A clinical effectiveness study
    Mendoza, Manel
    Bonacina, Erika
    Serrano, Berta
    Ricart, Marta
    Martin, Lourdes
    Lopez-Quesada, Eva
    Vives, Angels
    Maroto, Anna
    Garcia-Manau, Pablo
    De Antonio, Clementina
    Tusquets, Cristina
    Moreano, Gabriela
    Armengol-Alsina, Mireia
    Carreras, Elena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (03) : 803 - 809
  • [25] Antenatal detection of small for gestational age by universal single-scan screening in early third trimester
    McKeown, C. D.
    NiLaighin, C.
    Ismail, K. I.
    Hannigan, A.
    O'Donoghue, K.
    Cotter, A.
    Burke, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 27 - 27
  • [26] Prospective validation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21
    Kagan, K. O.
    Etchegaray, A.
    Zhou, Y.
    Wright, D.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [27] Second-trimester contingent screening for small-for-gestational-age neonate
    Nowacka, U.
    Papastefanou, I
    Bouariu, A.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [28] First Trimester Urine and Serum Metabolomics for Prediction of Preeclampsia and Gestational Hypertension: A Prospective Screening Study
    Austdal, Marie
    Tangeras, Line H.
    Skrastad, Ragnhild B.
    Salvesen, Kjell A.
    Austgulen, Rigmor
    Iversen, Ann-Charlotte
    Bathen, Tone F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2015, 16 (09) : 21520 - 21538
  • [29] First-trimester combined screening: experience with an instant results approach
    Norton, Mary E.
    Hopkins, Linda M.
    Pena, Sherri
    Krantz, David
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 196 (06) : 606 - 607
  • [30] Implementation of Routine First-Trimester Combined Screening for Preeclampsia: A Clinical Effectiveness Study
    Vinekar, Kavita
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 138 (01): : 134 - 134