Supporting decision-making processes for evidence-based mental health promotion

被引:10
|
作者
Jane-Llopis, Eva [1 ]
Katschnig, Heinz [2 ,3 ]
McDaid, David [4 ]
Wahlbeck, Kristian [5 ]
机构
[1] World Econ Forum, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Ludwig Boltzmann Inst Social Psychiat, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
[5] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf THL, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
evidence; decision making; mental health; promotion; prevention; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; METAANALYSES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/heapro/dar076
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The use of evidence is critical in guiding decision-making, but evidence from effect studies will be only one of a number of factors that will need to be taken into account in the decision-making processes. Equally important for policymakers will be the use of different types of evidence including implementation essentials and other decision-making principles such as social justice, political, ethical, equity issues, reflecting public attitudes and the level of resources available, rather than be based on health outcomes alone. This paper, aimed to support decision-makers, highlights the importance of commissioning high-quality evaluations, the key aspects to assess levels of evidence, the importance of supporting evidence-based implementation and what to look out for before, during and after implementation of mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:I140 / I146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] As a matter of fact: Evidence-based decision-making unplugged
    Birch, S
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 6 (06) : 547 - 559
  • [32] Patents for evidence-based decision-making and smart specialisation
    Bruno Brandão Fischer
    Maxim Kotsemir
    Dirk Meissner
    Ekaterina Streltsova
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2020, 45 : 1748 - 1774
  • [33] Shared Decision-Making and Evidence-Based Practice: A Commentary
    Ellen P. Fischer
    [J]. Community Mental Health Journal, 2006, 42 : 107 - 111
  • [34] THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES ON IMPLEMENTATION OF QUITLINE EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES
    Leischow, Scott
    Provan, Keith
    Bonito, Joe
    Moor, Gregg
    Saul, Jessie
    Beagles, Jonathan
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 41 : S74 - S74
  • [35] Evidence-based decision-making: the case for diabetes care
    Abu-Qamar, Ma'en
    Wilson, Anne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2007, 5 (02) : 254 - 260
  • [36] Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice: A commentary
    Fischer, EP
    [J]. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2006, 42 (01) : 107 - 111
  • [37] Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Decision-Making: The READ Model
    Novak, Iona
    te Velde, Anna
    Hines, Ashleigh
    Stanton, Emma
    Mc Namara, Maria
    Paton, Madison C. B.
    Finch-Edmondson, Megan
    Morgan, Catherine
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2021, 2
  • [38] Introducing a new series: Evidence-based decision-making
    Bachelet, Vivienne C.
    [J]. MEDWAVE, 2014, 14 (05): : e5968
  • [39] Raising the Bar: A Primer On Evidence-Based Decision-Making
    Cheng, Davy C. H.
    Martin, Janet E.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2005, 9 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [40] Trial recruitment decision-making: crucial but not evidence-based
    Treweek, Shaun
    Pitkethly, Marie
    Cook, Jonathan
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Mitchell, Elizabeth
    Sullivan, Frank
    Jackson, Catherine
    Taskila, Tyna
    Gardner, Heidi
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20