What Is Learned in Knowledge Graph Embeddings?

被引:1
|
作者
Douglas, Michael R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simkin, Michael [1 ]
Ben-Eliezer, Omri [1 ,4 ]
Wu, Tianqi [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Chin, Peter [1 ,7 ]
Dang, Trung, V [7 ]
Wood, Andrew [7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, CMSA, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Phys, YITP, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, SCGP, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] MIT, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] Clark Univ, Dept Math, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[6] Clark Univ, Dept Comp Sci, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[7] Boston Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
SCALE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_49
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A knowledge graph (KG) is a data structure which represents entities and relations as the vertices and edges of a directed graph with edge types. KGs are an important primitive in modern machine learning and artificial intelligence. Embedding-based models, such as the seminal TRANSE [Bordes et al. 2013] and the recent PAIRRE [Chao et al. 202] are among the most popular and successful approaches for representing KGs and inferring missing edges (link completion). Their relative success is often credited in the literature to their ability to learn logical rules between the relations. In this work, we investigate whether learning rules between relations is indeed what drives the performance of embedding-based methods. We define motif learning and two alternative mechanisms, network learning (based only on the connectivity of the KG, ignoring the relation types), and unstructured statistical learning (ignoring the connectivity of the graph). Using experiments on synthetic KGs, we show that KG models can learn motifs and how this ability is degraded by non-motif (noise) edges. We propose tests to distinguish the contributions of the three mechanisms to performance, and apply them to popular KG benchmarks. We also discuss an issue with the standard performance testing protocol and suggest an improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 602
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What is the Schema of your Knowledge Graph? Leveraging Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Clustering for Expressive Taxonomy Learning
    Zouaq, Amal
    Martel, Felix
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SEMANTIC BIG DATA (SBD 2020), 2020,
  • [2] Ultrahyperbolic Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Xiong, Bo
    Zhu, Shichao
    Nayyeri, Mojtaba
    Xu, Chengjin
    Pan, Shirui
    Zhou, Chuan
    Staab, Steffen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, KDD 2022, 2022, : 2130 - 2139
  • [3] Bias in Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Bourli, Styliani
    Pitoura, Evaggelia
    2020 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM), 2020, : 6 - 10
  • [4] Hypernetwork Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Balazevic, Ivana
    Allen, Carl
    Hospedales, Timothy M.
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MACHINE LEARNING - ICANN 2019: WORKSHOP AND SPECIAL SESSIONS, 2019, 11731 : 553 - 565
  • [5] Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Zhang, Shuai
    Tay, Yi
    Yao, Lina
    Liu, Qi
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [6] Debiasing knowledge graph embeddings
    Fisher, Joseph
    Mittal, Arpit
    Palfrey, Dave
    Christodoulopoulos, Christos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP), 2020, : 7332 - 7345
  • [7] Knowledge Association with Hyperbolic Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Sun, Zequn
    Chen, Muhao
    Hu, Wei
    Wang, Chengming
    Dai, Jian
    Zhang, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP), 2020, : 5704 - 5716
  • [8] CaRe: Open Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Gupta, Swapnil
    Kenkre, Sreyash
    Talukdar, Partha
    2019 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019): PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE, 2019, : 378 - 388
  • [9] Augmenting and Tuning Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Bamler, Robert
    Salehi, Farnood
    Mandt, Stephan
    35TH UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (UAI 2019), 2020, 115 : 508 - 518
  • [10] Dual Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddings
    Cao, Zongsheng
    Xu, Qianqian
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Cao, Xiaochun
    Huang, Qingming
    THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 6894 - 6902