The pharmacokinetics of equoral versus Neoral in stable renal transplant patients:: A multinational multicenter study

被引:20
|
作者
Masri, MA
Haberal, M
Rizvi, A
Stephan, A
Bilgin, N
Naqvi, A
Barbari, A
Kamel, G
Zafar, N
Emiroglu, R
Çolak, T
Manzoor, K
Matha, V
Kamarad, V
Rizk, S
Itany, AR
Shehedeh, I
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Rizk Hosp, SIUT Karachi Pakistan, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Prague Univ, IVAX, CR, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
We studied the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of the new generic cyclosporine formulation, Equoral capsules, after the switch from original formulation Neoral capsules in stable renal transplant patients. The study was carried out in accordance with the basic principles defined in the US 21 CFR Part 312.20 and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study included clinically stable first renal transplant patients maintained on cyclosporine with no rejection episode during the past 6 months. Hematology, biochemistry, and urine chemistry were determined on day 7, and day 21. The patients were all switched to Neoral (lot number 416MFD0601) on day 0 when the first sparse sampling PK was performed. On day 14 a 12-hour PK profile included predose, 30 minutes; 1 hour; 1 hour 30 minutes; 2 hours; 3 hours; 4 hours; 5 hours; 6 hours; 8 hours; 10-hours and 12-hour samples. Cyclosporine levels were determined using a CYA kit (Abbott TDx). On day 15 the patients were switched from Neoral capsules to Equoral capsules (lot 5T111014) at an equivalent dosage (mg/mg). The second sparse sampling PK was performed on day 21 and a 12-hour PK was performed on day 28. On the morning of day 29 patients were switched from Equoral capsules to Neoral capsules at an equivalent dosage (mg/mg). Additional concentrations were measured on days -7, 18, and 35. Safety parameters were monitored at each visit. The pharmacokinetics of both formulations were equivalent. The mean AUC for Neoral and Equoral was 2856 and 2892, respectively. The ratios of LSM and the 90% confidence intervals for the in-transformed parameters (AUC o-t, AUC inf, and Cmax) of Equoral and Neoral SGC were 98% and 95%, respectively, suggesting that Equoral and Neoral SGC are bioequivalent.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 83
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of iminoral compared with neoral in healthy volunteers and renal transplant recipients
    Sayyah, M.
    Argani, H.
    Pourmand, Gh. R.
    Amini, H.
    Ahmadiani, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (04) : 1214 - 1218
  • [42] USE OF SANDIMMUN-NEORAL IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
    FREI, U
    TAESCH, S
    NIESE, D
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 26 (05) : 2928 - 2931
  • [44] Acute renal failure in critically ill patients - A multinational, multicenter study
    Uchino, S
    Kellum, JA
    Bellomo, R
    Doig, GS
    Morimatsu, H
    Morgera, S
    Schetz, M
    Tan, I
    Bouman, C
    Macedo, E
    Gibney, N
    Tolwani, A
    Ronco, C
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (07): : 813 - 818
  • [45] Experience with clinical use of sandimmun neoral in renal transplant patients
    Min, ZL
    Zhao, M
    Zhu, YH
    Qi, J
    Wang, LM
    Wang, YW
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (03) : 1356 - 1357
  • [46] Neoral conversion in stable thoracic transplant patients leads to dose reduction
    Zaldonis, DB
    Keenan, RJ
    Pham, SM
    Kormos, RL
    Griffith, BP
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) : 1898 - 1899
  • [47] Neoral conversion in stable thoracic transplant patients leads to dose reduction
    Zaldonis, DB
    Keenan, RJ
    Pham, SM
    Kormos, RL
    Griffith, BP
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (04) : 1158 - 1159
  • [48] A randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety of switching stable renal transplant patients from sandimmun to sandimmun neoral
    Loo, CS
    Morad, Z
    Lim, TO
    Fan, KS
    Suleiman, AB
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (03) : 1328 - 1329
  • [49] Renal function in liver transplant recipients receiving Neoral versus Tacrolimus.
    VanBuren, D
    Payne, J
    Becker, B
    MacDonell, R
    Chapman, W
    Wright, JK
    Helderman, JH
    Richie, R
    Pinson, CW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1996, 7 (09): : A3394 - A3394
  • [50] Conversion from sandimmune to neoral at two different dose-ratio in stable renal transplant patients.
    Gaspari, F
    Perico, N
    Pisoni, R
    Anedda, MF
    Signorini, O
    Gotti, E
    Remuzzi, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1997, 8 : A3314 - A3314