The pharmacokinetics of equoral versus Neoral in stable renal transplant patients:: A multinational multicenter study

被引:20
|
作者
Masri, MA
Haberal, M
Rizvi, A
Stephan, A
Bilgin, N
Naqvi, A
Barbari, A
Kamel, G
Zafar, N
Emiroglu, R
Çolak, T
Manzoor, K
Matha, V
Kamarad, V
Rizk, S
Itany, AR
Shehedeh, I
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Rizk Hosp, SIUT Karachi Pakistan, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Prague Univ, IVAX, CR, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
We studied the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of the new generic cyclosporine formulation, Equoral capsules, after the switch from original formulation Neoral capsules in stable renal transplant patients. The study was carried out in accordance with the basic principles defined in the US 21 CFR Part 312.20 and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study included clinically stable first renal transplant patients maintained on cyclosporine with no rejection episode during the past 6 months. Hematology, biochemistry, and urine chemistry were determined on day 7, and day 21. The patients were all switched to Neoral (lot number 416MFD0601) on day 0 when the first sparse sampling PK was performed. On day 14 a 12-hour PK profile included predose, 30 minutes; 1 hour; 1 hour 30 minutes; 2 hours; 3 hours; 4 hours; 5 hours; 6 hours; 8 hours; 10-hours and 12-hour samples. Cyclosporine levels were determined using a CYA kit (Abbott TDx). On day 15 the patients were switched from Neoral capsules to Equoral capsules (lot 5T111014) at an equivalent dosage (mg/mg). The second sparse sampling PK was performed on day 21 and a 12-hour PK was performed on day 28. On the morning of day 29 patients were switched from Equoral capsules to Neoral capsules at an equivalent dosage (mg/mg). Additional concentrations were measured on days -7, 18, and 35. Safety parameters were monitored at each visit. The pharmacokinetics of both formulations were equivalent. The mean AUC for Neoral and Equoral was 2856 and 2892, respectively. The ratios of LSM and the 90% confidence intervals for the in-transformed parameters (AUC o-t, AUC inf, and Cmax) of Equoral and Neoral SGC were 98% and 95%, respectively, suggesting that Equoral and Neoral SGC are bioequivalent.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 83
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An open multicenter trial of conversion from sandimmun to neoral in stable kidney-transplant patients
    Hourmant, M
    Antoine, C
    Bayle, F
    Bedrossian, J
    Berthoux, F
    Cassuto, E
    Chalopin, JM
    Charpentier, B
    Deteix, P
    Durand, D
    deLigny, BH
    Kessler, M
    Kreis, H
    Lang, P
    Lebranchu, Y
    LerouxRobert, C
    Moulin, B
    Mourad, G
    Noel, C
    Olmer, M
    Potaux, L
    PouteilNoble, C
    Pruna, A
    Sraer, JD
    Touchard, G
    Toupance, O
    Touraine, JL
    Wolf, P
    Puget, S
    Soulillou, JP
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (05) : 2313 - 2314
  • [22] Conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral in stable renal transplant recipients
    Pescovitz, MD
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (04) : 2196 - 2198
  • [23] A randomized, controlled, double-blind study of the safety and tolerability of sandimmun neoral in stable renal transplant patients
    Massari, PU
    Grosso, S
    deBoccardo, G
    Vasquez, MC
    Schiavelli, RO
    Sabbatiello, RR
    Casadei, DH
    Rial, MD
    Jost, LJ
    Turin, MD
    Carreno, CAA
    Maggiora, EC
    Gadea, MM
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (06) : 3365 - 3367
  • [24] A Bioavailability Study of Cyclosporine: Comparison of Neoral Versus Cysporin in Stable Heart Transplant Recipients
    Leet, Angeline
    Richardson, Meroula
    Senior, Jodie-Anne
    Funston, Robyn
    Skiba, Marina
    Bailey, Michael
    Krum, Henry
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 28 (09): : 894 - 898
  • [25] Pharmacokinetics of neoral before and after total gastrectomy in a renal transplant patient
    Chapelle, T
    Roeyen, G
    De Greef, K
    Verpooten, GA
    Bosmans, JL
    Martin, M
    De Broe, ME
    Ysebaert, DK
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (03) : 805 - 806
  • [26] Advagraf® Pharmacokinetics Analysis in Stable Renal Transplant Patients.
    Benkali, Khaled
    Kamar, Nassim
    Premaud, Aurelie
    Marquet, Pierre
    Rousseau, Annick
    Rostaing, Lionel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 412 - 412
  • [27] Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of SangCya and Neoral in stable, adult renal transplant patients: Preliminary results
    Gaston, RS
    Said, M
    Ward, M
    Jones, P
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) : S161 - S161
  • [28] ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF SANDIMMUNE-NEORAL IN CANADA IN STABLE RENAL-TRANSPLANT PATIENTS
    KEOWN, P
    LAWEN, JG
    LANDSBERG, D
    BEAUREGARDZOLLINGER, L
    RIVIERE, M
    LECLERC, C
    HARDENS, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1995, 27 (02) : 1845 - 1848
  • [29] Pharmacokinetics (PK) of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, Myfortic®) in stable renal transplant patients with Neoral® or Tacrolimus.
    Kaplan, B
    Meier-Kriesche, HU
    Minnick, P
    Bastien, MC
    Sechaud, R
    Yeh, CM
    Balez, S
    Picard, F
    Schmouder, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 910A - 910A
  • [30] Conversion from Sandimmun to Neoral in stable pediatric renal transplant recipients
    Hoyer, PF
    Bökenkamp, A
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 1998, 12 (03) : 260 - 261