Olanzapine Versus Risperidone in Children and Adolescents with Psychosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:14
|
作者
Xia, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wen-Zheng [2 ]
Liu, Huan-Zhong [1 ,2 ]
Hao, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiang-Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Chaohu Hosp, Dept Psychiat, 64 Chaohu North Rd, Hefei 238000, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Anhui Psychiat Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1954 East Rd, Houston, TX 77054 USA
关键词
olanzapine; risperidone; antipsychotics; children and adolescents; meta-analysis; 2ND-GENERATION ANTIPSYCHOTICS; WEIGHT-GAIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; SCHIZOPHRENIA; QUALITY; 1ST;
D O I
10.1089/cap.2017.0120
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of olanzapine and risperidone in children and adolescents (aged <= 18 years) with psychosis by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Several English and Chinese databases were searched for studies published before February 8th, 2017. Two independent investigators screened the studies according to prespecified criteria and extracted the data. Review Manager 5.3 was used to conduct the data synthesis. Results: Eight RCTs involving 457 participants (225 participants in the olanzapine group and 232 participants in the risperidone group) were included. No significant differences were observed in the mean scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale/Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (standard mean difference [SMD]=-0.06, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = [-0.31, 0.19], p = 0.63), the positive symptom scores (SMD=-0.09, 95% CI = [-0.32, 0.15], p = 0.48), or the negative symptom scores (SMD=-0.11 95% CI = [-0.34, 0.13], p = 0.38) between the two groups. Regarding adverse effects, the mean increases in weight (MD = 2.90, 95% CI = [1.41, 4.39], p = 0.0001), body mass index (MD= 0.90, 95% CI = [0.42, 1.38], p = 0.0003), and incidence of hypersomnia (risk ratios [RR] = 1.98, 95% CI = [1.15, 3.43], p = 0.01) were higher in the olanzapine group, while the incidence of insomnia (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = [0.11, 0.85], p = 0.02), prolactin elevation (RR = 0.11, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.85], p = 0.03), myotonia (RR = 0.12, 95% CI = [0.03, 0.49], p = 0.003), tremor (RR = 0.22, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.63], p = 0.005), and akathisia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.12, 0.57], p = 0.0007) was higher in the risperidone group. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in efficacy between olanzapine and risperidone for the treatment of children and adolescents with psychosis, but the side effect profiles of these two medications differ. High-quality RCTs are needed before recommending clinical treatment in children and adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 251
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Ken
    Kou, Xun
    Han, Yu
    Zhou, Lin
    Zeng, Chunyu
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 126 : 165 - 165
  • [32] The atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials
    Pae, Chi-Un
    Lim, Hyn-Kook
    Peindl, Kathleen
    Ajwani, Neena
    Serretti, Alessandro
    Patkar, Ashwin A.
    Lee, Chul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 23 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [33] Atenolol versus Losartan in Marfan Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sharma, Sharan
    Dahal, Khagendra
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [34] Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chang, Yu
    Huang, Yun-Ting
    Chi, Kuan-Yu
    Huang, Yen-Ta
    [J]. PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [35] CRYSTALLOIDS VERSUS SALINE IN SEPSIS TREATMENT: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Elhadi, Muhammed
    Khaled, Ala
    Faraj, Hazem
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [36] EFFICACY OF EZETIMIBE AND STATIN VERSUS STATIN: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Koduri, Hemantha
    Kanmanthareddy, Arun
    Akinapelli, Abhilash
    Bansal, Ojas
    Pandya, Jitendra
    Aggarwal, Saurabh
    Azzouz, Muhammad Soubhi
    Del Core, Michael
    Mooss, Aryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 1884 - 1884
  • [37] Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparciscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hosono, Shunsuke
    Osaka, Hirohisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (02): : 191 - 199
  • [38] External Stent Versus No Stent for Pancreaticojejunostomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hong, Shukun
    Wang, Hongye
    Yang, Shiyong
    Yang, Kunxing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (08) : 1516 - 1525
  • [39] Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin Versus Simvastatin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhen Jiang
    Ren Rong Gong
    Li Qiu
    Qian Wang
    Mi Su
    Xiao Juan Liu
    Min Shan Hu
    Jia Lin
    Ding Zhi Fang
    [J]. Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, 34 : 599 - 608
  • [40] Merocel versus Nasopore for Nasal Packing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Jianzhang
    Cai, Changping
    Wang, Shili
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):