Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:17
|
作者
Chang, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Yun-Ting [2 ]
Chi, Kuan-Yu [3 ,4 ]
Huang, Yen-Ta [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
PEERJ | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
Remimazolam; Propofol; Procedural sedation; Meta-analysis; COLONOSCOPY; DISCOMFORT; ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; SAFETY; AGENTS; PAIN;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.15495
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation.Methods. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with "metafor"package with random-effects model.Results. A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14-0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22-0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14-0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONY) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15-2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53-1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03-0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups.Conclusions. Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONY, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives.PROSPERO registration number. CRD42022362950
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Junbao
    Cairen, Zhuoma
    Shi, Liwen
    Pang, Shasha
    Shao, Yingjie
    Wang, Yun
    Lu, Zhihong
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2022, 88 (12) : 1035 - 1042
  • [2] Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis
    Jhuang, Bo-Jyun
    Yeh, Bo-Han
    Huang, Yen-Ta
    Lai, Pei-Chun
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [3] Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy within elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ahmer, Wania
    Imtiaz, Sahar
    Alam, Daniyal Muhammad
    Ahmed, Khadija
    Sajid, Barka
    Yousuf, Juvairia
    Asnani, Sunny
    Fahim, Muhammad Ahmed Ali
    Ali, Rahmeen
    Mansoor, Marium
    Safdar, Muhammad Talha
    Anjum, Muhammad Umair
    Hasanain, Muhammad
    Larik, Muhammad Omar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 80 (04) : 493 - 503
  • [4] Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy within elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wania Ahmer
    Sahar Imtiaz
    Daniyal Muhammad Alam
    Khadija Ahmed
    Barka Sajid
    Juvairia Yousuf
    Sunny Asnani
    Muhammad Ahmed Ali Fahim
    Rahmeen Ali
    Marium Mansoor
    Muhammad Talha Safdar
    Muhammad Umair Anjum
    Muhammad Hasanain
    Muhammad Omar Larik
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2024, 80 : 493 - 503
  • [5] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: combination of ketamine and propofol versus ketamine alone for procedural sedation and analgesia in children
    Hu, Yaofei
    Xu, Wujie
    Cao, Fei
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 14 (07) : 1159 - 1165
  • [6] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: combination of ketamine and propofol versus ketamine alone for procedural sedation and analgesia in children
    Yaofei Hu
    Wujie Xu
    Fei Cao
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2019, 14 : 1159 - 1165
  • [7] The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
    An, Xincan
    Shen, Tianqi
    Yin, Xingxing
    Xu, Jin
    Zhang, Yongming
    Wang, Tianlong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [8] The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis
    Xincan An
    Tianqi Shen
    Xingxing Yin
    Jin Xu
    Yongming Zhang
    Tianlong Wang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [9] Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi
    Santo, Paula Arruda Espirito
    Baraldo, Stefano
    Meine, Gilmara Coelho
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (06) : 1219 - 1229
  • [10] Remimazolam versus Propofol on Procedural Sedation and Anesthesia under Digestive Endoscopy in Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes
    Wang, Yizheng
    Liu, Xuemei
    Lin, Jingyan
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2023, 42 (07): : 1445 - 1450