Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:17
|
作者
Chang, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Yun-Ting [2 ]
Chi, Kuan-Yu [3 ,4 ]
Huang, Yen-Ta [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Dept Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
PEERJ | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
Remimazolam; Propofol; Procedural sedation; Meta-analysis; COLONOSCOPY; DISCOMFORT; ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; SAFETY; AGENTS; PAIN;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.15495
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation.Methods. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with "metafor"package with random-effects model.Results. A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14-0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22-0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14-0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONY) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15-2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53-1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03-0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups.Conclusions. Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONY, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives.PROSPERO registration number. CRD42022362950
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] General anesthesia versus sedation for endovascular thrombectomy: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shenhui, Jin
    Wenwen, Du
    Dongdong, Liang
    Yelong, Ren
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [32] Propofol vs midazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guacho, John Alexander Lata
    de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
    Ribeiro, Igor Braga
    da Ponte Neto, Alberto Machado
    Singh, Shailendra
    Tucci, Marina Gammaro Baldavira
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 12 (08):
  • [33] Ciprofol vs Propofol for the Sedation/Anesthesia During Endoscopic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Saeed, Abdallah
    Elewidi, Mariam
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    Othman, Abdalla
    Elzahaby, Amr
    Khaled, Asmaa
    Jaber, Fouad
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S513 - S513
  • [34] Evaluating the Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine (Ketodex) Versus Ketamine-Propofol (Ketofol) Combination in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Silva, A.
    Pena, K.
    Neto, O.
    Landal, G.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 84 (04) : S100 - S101
  • [35] Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation in Older Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
    Lee, Myeongjong
    Lee, Cheol
    Choi, Guen Joo
    Kang, Hyun
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [36] Comments on "Postoperative delirium under general anesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials" - Reply
    Suga, Masafumi
    Yasuhara, Jun
    Watanabe, Atsuyuki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2025, 103
  • [37] The efficacy of fentanyl supplementation for the sedation of bronchoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Dan
    Ye, Yulan
    Deng, Shukai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (08): : 9559 - 9565
  • [38] The impact of alfentanil supplementation on the sedation of bronchoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ou, Yan
    Feng, Malong
    Hu, Bingqing
    Dong, Yishan
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (31) : E27401
  • [39] Safety and efficacy of propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Enniss, DL
    Mandelblat, J
    Singh, R
    Bank, S
    Singh, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (09): : S247 - S247
  • [40] General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Meta-analysis of 4 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Campbell, Doug
    Diprose, William K.
    Deng, Carolyn
    Barber, P. Alan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 33 (01) : 21 - 27