RELIGIOUS VOTING IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: TESTING ALTERNATIVE THEORIES

被引:2
|
作者
Kellstedt, Lyman A. [1 ]
Guth, James L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wheaton Coll, Emeritus, Wheaton, IL 60187 USA
[2] Furman Univ, Polit Sci, Greenville, SC 29613 USA
来源
POLITICS AND RELIGION JOURNAL | 2021年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
ethnoreligious; restructuring theory; traditionalists; modernists;
D O I
10.54561/prj1502257k
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Scholars of American electoral politics have documented the recent partisan realignment of religious groups. Indeed, careful analysts often find that religious variables are better predictors of partisan choice than classic socioeconomic divisions. Still, there has been relatively little effort to put this religious realignment in both theoretical and historical perspective. In this article, we update our previous work on the historical evolution of religious partisanship, demonstrating the continued relevance of ethnocultural (or ethnoreligious) theory, utilized by political historians, and restructuring theory, an important sociological perspective. Both viewpoints help us understand presidential elections since the 1930s, as we demonstrate with data from a wide range of surveys. After utilizing the 2020 Cooperative Election Study to examine the contemporary voting of ethnoreligious groups in greater detail, we test the impact of religious variables controlling for other demographic, attitudinal, and partisan influences and find that religious identities and orientations often retain independent influence even under stringent controls for other factors shaping the presidential vote.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 281
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] APPROVAL VOTING, EVALUATION VOTING: AN EXPERIMENT DURING THE 2012 FRENCH PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    Baujard, Antoinette
    Gavrel, Frederic
    Igersheim, Herrade
    Laslier, Jean-Francois
    Lebon, Isabelle
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2013, 64 (02): : 345 - 356
  • [42] Debunking the "Big Lie": Election Administration in the 2020 Presidential Election
    Canon, David T.
    Sherman, Owen
    PRESIDENTIAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2021, 51 (03) : 546 - 581
  • [43] Estimation of the 2020 US Presidential Election Competition and Election Stratagies
    Kim, Arthur
    Kim, Peter
    2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 1046 - 1050
  • [44] Medicare for All, Some, or None? Testing the Effects of Ambiguity in the Context of the 2020 Presidential Election
    Simas, Elizabeth N.
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2021, 54 (02) : 208 - 213
  • [45] #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
    Emily Chen
    Ashok Deb
    Emilio Ferrara
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2022, 5 : 1 - 18
  • [46] #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
    Chen, Emily
    Deb, Ashok
    Ferrara, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 5 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [47] National Presidential Election Turnout: 1952 to 2020
    Romero, Francine Sanders
    Romero, David W.
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (06) : 637 - 645
  • [48] Covid-19 and the 2020 presidential election
    Mitchell, David M.
    CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2023, 34 (02) : 188 - 209
  • [49] Commentary: The 2020 US Presidential Election and Immigration
    Martin, Susan F.
    INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2020, 58 (05) : 274 - 276
  • [50] Covid-19 and the 2020 presidential election
    David M. Mitchell
    Constitutional Political Economy, 2023, 34 : 188 - 209