Top-down and bottom-up modulation of audiovisual integration in speech

被引:30
|
作者
Colin, C
Radeau, M
Deltenre, P
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Res Unit Cognit Neurosci, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Brugmann Univ Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09541440440000168
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research assesses how audiovisual speech integration mechanisms are modulated by sensory and cognitive variables. For this purpose, the McGurk effect (McGurk & MacDonald, 1976) was used as an experimental paradigm. This effect occurs when participants are exposed to incongruent auditory and visual speech signals. For examples, when an auditory /b/ is dubbed onto a visual /g/, listeners are led to perceive a fused pheneme like /d/. With the reverse presentation, they experience a combination such as /bg/. In two experiments, auditory intensity (40 dB, 50 dB, 60 dB, and 70 dB), face size (large: 19 x 23 cm and small: 1.8 x 2 cm) and instructions ("multiple choice" and "free response") were manipulated. Face size and instruction were between-participants variable in both experiments, whereas intensity was a within-participants variable in the first experiment and a between-participants variable in the second one. The main effect of instruction manipulation was highly significant in both experience, the "multiple choice" condition giving rise to more illusions than the "free response" condition. Intensity was significant in the second experiment only. Illusions were more numerous at 40 dB than at the other three intensities. Finally, a small effect of face size was observed in the second experiment only, illusions being slightly more numerous with the large face. Those results indicate that the processing chain underlying audiovisual speech perception is modulated by the perceptual salience of the visual and auditory inputs as well as by cognitive variables.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 560
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mass spectrometry: Bottom-up or top-down?
    Chait, Brian T.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 314 (5796) : 65 - 66
  • [32] Medezeggenschap: top-down en bottom-up
    Astrid van de Weijenberg
    [J]. Management Kinderopvang, 2016, 22 (1) : 24 - 26
  • [33] Bottom-up Segmentation for Top-down Detection
    Fidler, Sanja
    Mottaghi, Roozbeh
    Yuille, Alan
    Urtasun, Raquel
    [J]. 2013 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2013, : 3294 - 3301
  • [34] Top-down bottom-up graphene synthesis
    Zhang, Zishuai
    Fraser, Alison
    Ye, Siyu
    Merle, Geraldine
    Barralet, Jake
    [J]. NANO FUTURES, 2019, 3 (04)
  • [35] Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent
    Pinto, Yair
    van der Leij, Andries R.
    Sligte, Ilja G.
    Lamme, Victor A. F.
    Scholte, H. Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03): : 16
  • [36] Visual search: Bottom-up or top-down?
    Patel, GA
    Sathian, K
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE, 2000, 5 : D169 - D193
  • [37] Top-down and bottom-up quality management
    Hurst, Keith
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2010, 23 (07) : 16 - 17
  • [38] Top-down and bottom-up research in biodemography
    Kaplan, Hillard
    Gurven, Michael
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2008, 19 : 1587 - 1602
  • [39] Bottom-Up and Top-Down Graph Pooling
    Yang, Jia-Qi
    Zhan, De-Chuan
    Li, Xin-Chun
    [J]. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PAKDD 2020, PT II, 2020, 12085 : 568 - 579
  • [40] Combined Top-Down/Bottom-Up Segmentation
    Borenstein, Eran
    Ullman, Shimon
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 30 (12) : 2109 - 2125