Top-down and bottom-up modulation of audiovisual integration in speech

被引:30
|
作者
Colin, C
Radeau, M
Deltenre, P
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Res Unit Cognit Neurosci, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Brugmann Univ Hosp, Brussels, Belgium
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09541440440000168
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research assesses how audiovisual speech integration mechanisms are modulated by sensory and cognitive variables. For this purpose, the McGurk effect (McGurk & MacDonald, 1976) was used as an experimental paradigm. This effect occurs when participants are exposed to incongruent auditory and visual speech signals. For examples, when an auditory /b/ is dubbed onto a visual /g/, listeners are led to perceive a fused pheneme like /d/. With the reverse presentation, they experience a combination such as /bg/. In two experiments, auditory intensity (40 dB, 50 dB, 60 dB, and 70 dB), face size (large: 19 x 23 cm and small: 1.8 x 2 cm) and instructions ("multiple choice" and "free response") were manipulated. Face size and instruction were between-participants variable in both experiments, whereas intensity was a within-participants variable in the first experiment and a between-participants variable in the second one. The main effect of instruction manipulation was highly significant in both experience, the "multiple choice" condition giving rise to more illusions than the "free response" condition. Intensity was significant in the second experiment only. Illusions were more numerous at 40 dB than at the other three intensities. Finally, a small effect of face size was observed in the second experiment only, illusions being slightly more numerous with the large face. Those results indicate that the processing chain underlying audiovisual speech perception is modulated by the perceptual salience of the visual and auditory inputs as well as by cognitive variables.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 560
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The integration of scheduling and control: Top-down vs. bottom-up
    Caspari, Adrian
    Tsay, Calvin
    Mhamdi, Adel
    Baldea, Michael
    Mitsos, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2020, 91 : 50 - 62
  • [22] Top-down and bottom-up modulation of pain-induced oscillations
    Hauck, Michael
    Domnick, Claudia
    Lorenz, Juergen
    Gerloff, Christian
    Engel, Andreas K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [23] A Bottom-Up and Top-Down Integration Framework for Online Object Tracking
    Li, Meihui
    Peng, Lingbing
    Wu, Tianfu
    Peng, Zhenming
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2021, 23 : 105 - 119
  • [24] Matching bottom-up and top-down for verification and integration of LCI databases
    Weidema, BP
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON QUALITY OF LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY (LCI) DATA, 2004, 6941 : 59 - 61
  • [25] Bottom-up and top-down integration of human and ecological risk assessment
    Suter, GW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2004, 67 (8-10): : 779 - 790
  • [26] Multilevel Governance: Framing the Integration of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Policymaking
    Homsy, George C.
    Liu, Zhilin
    Warner, Mildred E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 42 (07) : 572 - 582
  • [27] The Integration of Top-down and Bottom-up Inputs to the Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons
    Zhang, Yan-Feng
    Reynolds, John N. J.
    [J]. CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 22 (09) : 1566 - 1575
  • [28] Bottom-up, not top-down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models
    Press, Clare
    Gillmeister, Helge
    Heyes, Cecilia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 24 (08) : 2415 - 2419
  • [29] Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Macroeconomics
    De Grauwe, Paul
    [J]. CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 56 (04) : 465 - 497
  • [30] IMPLEMENTING DIVERSITY: TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP
    Lievens, S.
    [J]. ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 4650 - 4650