Acute low back pain information online: An evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites

被引:44
|
作者
Hendrick, Paul A. [1 ]
Ahmed, Osman H. [1 ]
Bankier, Shane S. [1 ]
Chan, Tze Jieh [1 ]
Crawford, Sarah A. [1 ]
Ryder, Catherine R. [1 ]
Welsh, Lisa J. [1 ]
Schneiders, Anthony G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Physiotherapy, Ctr Physiotherapy Res, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
关键词
Acute low back pain; Internet; Health Information; WEB-BASED INFORMATION; HEALTH-INFORMATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; BOOKLET; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2012.02.019
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The internet is increasingly being used as a source of health information by the general public. Numerous websites exist that provide advice and information on the diagnosis and management of acute low back pain (ALBP), however, the accuracy and utility of this information has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to establish the quality, content and readability of online information relating to the treatment and management of ALBP. The internet was systematically searched using Google search engines from six major English-speaking countries. In addition, relevant national and international low back pain-related professional organisations were also searched. A total of 22 relevant websites was identified. The accuracy of the content of the ALBP information was established using a 13 point guide developed from international guidelines. Website quality was evaluated using the HONcode, and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade level (FKGL) was used to establish readability. The majority of websites lacked accurate information, resulting in an overall mean content accuracy score of 6.3/17. Only 3 websites had a high content accuracy score (>14/17) along with an acceptable readability score (FKGL 6-8) with the majority of websites providing information which exceeded the recommended level for the average person to comprehend. The most accurately reported category was, "Education and reassurance" (98%) while information regarding "manipulation" (50%), "massage" (9%) and "exercise" (0%) were amongst the lowest scoring categories. These results demonstrate the need for more accurate and readable internet-based ALBP information specifically centred on evidence-based guidelines. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 324
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery
    Guo, Wei-jun
    Wang, Wei-kang
    Xu, Ding
    Qiao, Zhi
    Shi, Yu-long
    Luo, Peng
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (07) : 494 - 502
  • [22] Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information
    Broderick, James M.
    McCarthy, Andrea
    Hogan, Niall
    KNEE, 2021, 28 : 139 - 150
  • [23] Online information on dysmenorrhoea: An evaluation of readability, credibility, quality and usability
    Lovett, Jordan
    Gordon, Candice
    Patton, Shelby
    Chen, Chen X.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (19-20) : 3590 - 3598
  • [24] A content analysis of the interventions for low back pain promoted on the websites of Australian pain clinics
    Maher, Chris G.
    Han, Christopher S.
    Gilbert, Stephen E.
    Nicholas, Michael K.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2024, 30 (02)
  • [25] Online Information for Treatment for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Assessment of Timeliness, Content, Quality, and Readability
    Doubleday, Amanda R.
    Novin, Sherwin
    Long, Kristin L.
    Schneider, David F.
    Sippel, Rebecca S.
    Pitt, Susan C.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2021, 36 (04) : 850 - 857
  • [26] Online Information for Treatment for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Assessment of Timeliness, Content, Quality, and Readability
    Amanda R. Doubleday
    Sherwin Novin
    Kristin L. Long
    David F. Schneider
    Rebecca S. Sippel
    Susan C. Pitt
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2021, 36 : 850 - 857
  • [27] Comprehensiveness, accuracy, quality, credibility and readability of online information about knee osteoarthritis
    Goff, Anthony J.
    Barton, Christian J.
    Merolli, Mark
    Zhang Quah, Andre Shi
    Ki-Cheong Hoe, Caleb
    De Oliveira Silva, Danilo
    HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 52 (03) : 185 - 193
  • [28] EXPLORING THE READABILITY, QUALITY, AND ACCURACY OF ONLINE HEALTH INFORMATION FOR PENILE IMPLANTS/PROSTHESES
    Plambeck, Benjamin
    Jiang, Jinfeng
    Fu, David
    Colvin, Alexandra
    Deibert, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E474 - E474
  • [29] Back pain online - A cross-sectional survey of the quality of Web-based information on low back pain
    Butler, L
    Foster, NE
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (04) : 395 - 401
  • [30] Readability and quality of online patient materials in the websites of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and related orthopaedic societies
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Iwata, Kazunari
    Nishizumi, Kanako
    Ito, Akane
    Ohtori, Seiji
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2023, 28 (04) : 901 - 906