Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information

被引:9
|
作者
Broderick, James M. [1 ]
McCarthy, Andrea [1 ]
Hogan, Niall [1 ]
机构
[1] St James Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Jamess St, Dublin D08 NHY1, Ireland
来源
KNEE | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
Knee osteotomy; Patient education; Internet; Quality of information; Readability; PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS; HEALTH LITERACY; ASSOCIATION; INTERNET; HIP; OUTCOMES; CARE; WEB;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As knee osteotomy surgery becomes increasingly accessible, more patients may turn to the Internet for information. This study examined the source, quality, content and readability of online information regarding osteotomy around the knee. Methods: The first 70 websites returned by the top four search engines were identified using the key words: "knee osteotomy" and "high tibial osteotomy." The websites were categorised by type and assessed using the DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and a novel Knee Osteotomy-Specific Score (KOSS). The presence of the Health On the Net (HON) code accreditation seal was noted. Readability of each website was assessed using eight readability formulae. The mean reading grade level (RGL) was compared to the 6th and 8th grade reading levels. The mean RGL of each category was also compared. Results: Of the 45 unique websites analysed, the majority were Physician (33%) and Journal websites (31%). The mean DISCERN score was 36.7 (+/- 8.9) which is classified as 'poor.' The mean JAMA benchmark criteria score was 2.04 (+/- 1.5) and Physician websites were most likely to be scored zero. The mean KOSS was 15.4 (+/- 5.7). The highest scoring website was a Commercial site but, overall, Journal category sites provided the best quality information. Websites that bore the HONcode seal obtained higher DISCERN, JAMA benchmark criteria and Knee Osteotomy - Specific Scores. The cumulative mean RGL was 13.2 (+/- 2.2) which exceeded the 6th grade level by an average of 7.2 grade levels and the 8th grade level by an average of 5.2 grade levels. No website (0%) was written at or below either the 6th or the 8th grade reading levels. The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score of all websites was 41.13 (+/- 14.7) which is classified as 'difficult.' Journal websites had the highest RGL. Conclusion: The information available online regarding osteotomy around the knee varies tremendously in quality and completeness. Physician sites predominate, but these were among the lowest scoring of all websites. Even where high quality information is available, it is set at too high a level to be easily understood. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 150
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Knee osteotomy: Quality tools and readability data of information on the internet
    Broderick, James M.
    McCarthy, Andrea
    Hogan, Niall
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2021, 34
  • [2] Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis
    Ng, Mitchell K.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (03): : 647 - +
  • [3] Trabeculectomy: An assessment of the quality and readability of online patient information
    Donnelly, Aaron
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 97
  • [4] Assessment of the Quality, Content, and Readability of Freely Available Online Information for Patients Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy
    Kloosterboer, Amy
    Yannuzzi, Nicolas A.
    Patel, Nimesh A.
    Kuriyan, Ajay E.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 137 (11) : 1240 - 1245
  • [5] Varicocele Embolization: An Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information
    Alderson, J. H.
    O'Neil, D. C.
    Redmond, C. E.
    Mulholland, D.
    Lee, M. J.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 841 - 846
  • [6] Online resources for information on shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of quality and readability
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Singh, Jaspal
    Vadhera, Amar S.
    Koa, Jonathan
    Boufadel, Peter
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    [J]. CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2023, 26 (03): : 238 - 244
  • [7] Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents
    Mozafarpour, Sarah
    Norris, Briony
    Borin, James
    Eisner, Brian H.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (06) : 985 - 992
  • [8] Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents
    Sarah Mozafarpour
    Briony Norris
    James Borin
    Brian H. Eisner
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 985 - 992
  • [9] Online Information for Treatment for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Assessment of Timeliness, Content, Quality, and Readability
    Doubleday, Amanda R.
    Novin, Sherwin
    Long, Kristin L.
    Schneider, David F.
    Sippel, Rebecca S.
    Pitt, Susan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2021, 36 (04) : 850 - 857
  • [10] Online Information for Treatment for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: Assessment of Timeliness, Content, Quality, and Readability
    Amanda R. Doubleday
    Sherwin Novin
    Kristin L. Long
    David F. Schneider
    Rebecca S. Sippel
    Susan C. Pitt
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2021, 36 : 850 - 857