Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:90
|
作者
Gall, Carolin [1 ]
Schmidt, Sein [2 ]
Schittkowski, Michael P. [3 ]
Antal, Andrea [4 ]
Ambrus, Geza Gergely [4 ]
Paulus, Walter [4 ]
Dannhauer, Moritz [5 ,6 ]
Michalik, Romualda [1 ]
Mante, Alf [2 ]
Bola, Michal [1 ]
Lux, Anke [7 ]
Kropf, Siegfried [7 ]
Brandt, Stephan A. [2 ]
Sabel, Bernhard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Med, Inst Med Psychol, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Ophthalmol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Utah, Ctr Integrat Biomed Comp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Utah, Sci Comp & Imaging Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Magdeburg, Inst Biometry & Med Informat, Magdeburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN-STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IMPROVES VISION; FIELDS; EEG;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0156134
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Vision loss after optic neuropathy is considered irreversible. Here, repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied in partially blind patients with the goal of activating their residual vision. Methods We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in an ambulatory setting with daily application of rtACS (n = 45) or sham-stimulation (n = 37) for 50 min for a duration of 10 week days. A volunteer sample of patients with optic nerve damage (mean age 59.1 yrs) was recruited. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was super-threshold visual fields with 48 hrs after the last treatment day and at 2-months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were near-threshold visual fields, reaction time, visual acuity, and resting-state EEGs to assess changes in brain physiology. Results The rtACS-treated group had a mean improvement in visual field of 24.0% which was significantly greater than after sham-stimulation (2.5%). This improvement persisted for at least 2 months in terms of both within-and between-group comparisons. Secondary analyses revealed improvements of near-threshold visual fields in the central 5 degrees and increased thresholds in static perimetry after rtACS and improved reaction times, but visual acuity did not change compared to shams. Visual field improvement induced by rtACS was associated with EEG power-spectra and coherence alterations in visual cortical networks which are interpreted as signs of neuromodulation. Current flow simulation indicates current in the frontal cortex, eye, and optic nerve and in the subcortical but not in the cortical regions. Conclusion rtACS treatment is a safe and effective means to partially restore vision after optic nerve damage probably by modulating brain plasticity. This class 1 evidence suggests that visual fields can be improved in a clinically meaningful way.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Stavrakis, Stavros
    Chakraborty, Praloy
    Farhat, Kassem
    Whyte, Seabrook
    Morris, Lynsie
    Asad, Zain Ul Abideen
    Karfonta, Brittany
    Anjum, Juvaria
    Matlock, Greg
    Cai, Xue
    Yu, Xichun
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 346 - 355
  • [42] Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Children With Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Lordelo, Patricia
    Teles, Alcina
    Veiga, Maria Luiza
    Correia, Luis Claudio
    Barroso, Ubirajara, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (02): : 683 - 689
  • [43] ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF NERVE WITH MIDDLE-FREQUENCY ALTERNATING CURRENT
    WYSS, O
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1963, 15 (04): : 710 - &
  • [44] Repetitive Non-Invasive Alternating Current Stimulation Improves Vision In Patients With Long Lasting Traumatic Optic Neuropathy
    Fedorov, Anton
    Chibisova, Yulia
    Gall, Carolin
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 636 - 637
  • [45] Non-invasive electric current stimulation for restoration of vision after unilateral occipital stroke
    Gall, Carolin
    Silvennoinen, Katri
    Granata, Giuseppe
    de Rossi, Francesca
    Vecchio, Fabrizio
    Broesel, Doreen
    Bola, Michal
    Sailer, Michael
    Waleszczyk, Wioletta J.
    Rossini, Paolo M.
    Tatlisumak, Turgut
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 43 : 231 - 236
  • [46] Vision restoration after brain damage: The "Residual Vision Activation Theory"
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 501 - 502
  • [47] Optic cup enlargement followed by reduced optic nerve head circulation after optic nerve stimulation
    Sugiyama, T
    Hara, H
    Oku, H
    Nakatsuji, S
    Okuno, T
    Sasaoka, M
    Ota, T
    Ikeda, T
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (12) : 2843 - 2848
  • [48] Preliminary Results of Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation in Chronic Low Vision: Correlation of Clinical and Neurophysiological Results
    Granata, Giuseppe
    Falsini, Benedetto
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (04): : 892 - 894
  • [49] Preliminary Results of Repetitive Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation in Optic Neuropathies
    Livengood, Heather
    Wollstein, Gadi
    Ishikawa, Hiroshi
    Wu, Mengfei
    Liu, Mengling
    Achanta, Priya
    Al-Aswad, Lama A.
    Panarelli, Joseph F.
    Misra, Poonam
    Do, Anna
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    Schuman, Joel S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [50] Reduction in Left Frontal Alpha Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder Is Context Dependent in a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Riddle, Justin
    Alexander, Morgan L.
    Schiller, Crystal Edler R.
    Rubinow, David R.
    Frohlich, Flavio
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY-COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING, 2022, 7 (03) : 302 - 311