Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:90
|
作者
Gall, Carolin [1 ]
Schmidt, Sein [2 ]
Schittkowski, Michael P. [3 ]
Antal, Andrea [4 ]
Ambrus, Geza Gergely [4 ]
Paulus, Walter [4 ]
Dannhauer, Moritz [5 ,6 ]
Michalik, Romualda [1 ]
Mante, Alf [2 ]
Bola, Michal [1 ]
Lux, Anke [7 ]
Kropf, Siegfried [7 ]
Brandt, Stephan A. [2 ]
Sabel, Bernhard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Med, Inst Med Psychol, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Ophthalmol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Utah, Ctr Integrat Biomed Comp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Utah, Sci Comp & Imaging Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Magdeburg, Inst Biometry & Med Informat, Magdeburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN-STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IMPROVES VISION; FIELDS; EEG;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0156134
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Vision loss after optic neuropathy is considered irreversible. Here, repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied in partially blind patients with the goal of activating their residual vision. Methods We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in an ambulatory setting with daily application of rtACS (n = 45) or sham-stimulation (n = 37) for 50 min for a duration of 10 week days. A volunteer sample of patients with optic nerve damage (mean age 59.1 yrs) was recruited. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was super-threshold visual fields with 48 hrs after the last treatment day and at 2-months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were near-threshold visual fields, reaction time, visual acuity, and resting-state EEGs to assess changes in brain physiology. Results The rtACS-treated group had a mean improvement in visual field of 24.0% which was significantly greater than after sham-stimulation (2.5%). This improvement persisted for at least 2 months in terms of both within-and between-group comparisons. Secondary analyses revealed improvements of near-threshold visual fields in the central 5 degrees and increased thresholds in static perimetry after rtACS and improved reaction times, but visual acuity did not change compared to shams. Visual field improvement induced by rtACS was associated with EEG power-spectra and coherence alterations in visual cortical networks which are interpreted as signs of neuromodulation. Current flow simulation indicates current in the frontal cortex, eye, and optic nerve and in the subcortical but not in the cortical regions. Conclusion rtACS treatment is a safe and effective means to partially restore vision after optic nerve damage probably by modulating brain plasticity. This class 1 evidence suggests that visual fields can be improved in a clinically meaningful way.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)
    Raty, Silja
    Borrmann, Carolin
    Granata, Giuseppe
    Cardenas-Morales, Lizbeth
    Schoenfeld, Ariel
    Sailer, Michael
    Silvennoinen, Katri
    Holopainen, Juha
    De Rossi, Francesca
    Antal, Andrea
    Rossini, Paolo M.
    Tatlisumak, Turgut
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 39 (03) : 221 - 235
  • [22] REVIS-network: Restoration of vision after stroke with non-invasive alternating current stimulation to improve visual impairment
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    Broesel, Doreen
    Krohn, Franziska
    Schlaug, Christiane
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    Tatlisumak, Turgut
    Gall, Carolin
    BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (5-6) : 764 - 764
  • [23] Randomized trial of transcranial alternating current stimulation for treatment of auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia
    Mellin, Juliann M.
    Alagapan, Sankaraleengam
    Lustenberger, Caroline
    Lugo, Courtney E.
    Alexander, Morgan L.
    Gilmore, John H.
    Jarskog, L. Fredrik
    Frohlich, Flavio
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 51 : 25 - 33
  • [24] Experience-Dependent Plasticity and Vision Restoration in Rats after Optic Nerve Crush
    Prilloff, Sylvia
    Henrich-Noack, Petra
    Kropf, Siegfried
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2010, 27 (12) : 2295 - 2307
  • [25] Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation
    Zerbib, F.
    Siproudhis, L.
    Lehur, P. -A.
    Germain, C.
    Mion, F.
    Leroi, A. -M.
    Coffin, B.
    Le Sidaner, A.
    Vitton, V.
    Bouyssou-Cellier, C.
    Chene, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (03) : 205 - 213
  • [26] The functional effect of repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) in a double-masked randomized clinical trial
    Toyos, Allison
    Cadena, Maria de los Angeles Ramos
    Livengood, Heather
    Lee, TingFang
    Hu, Jiyuan
    Sabel, Bernhard
    Matayev, Rachel
    Wollstein, Gadi
    Schuman, Joel S.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [27] Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation in optic neuropathy
    Gall, Carolin
    Fedorov, Anton B.
    Ernst, Lisa
    Borrmann, Antonia
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2010, 27 (04) : 335 - 341
  • [28] Electric field stimulation directs target-specific axon regeneration and partial restoration of vision after optic nerve crush injury
    Kim, Timothy
    Iseri, Ege
    Peng, Micalla G.
    Medvidovic, Sasha
    Silliman, Timothy
    Pahlavan, Pooyan
    Niu, Gengle
    Huang, Connie
    Simonyan, Anahit
    Pahnahad, Javad
    Yao, Petcy
    Lam, Phillip
    Garimella, Vahini
    Shahidi, Mahnaz
    Bienkowski, Michael S.
    Lee, Darrin J.
    Thomas, Biju
    Lazzi, Gianluca
    Gokoffski, Kimberly K.
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [29] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Fridriksson, Julius
    Rorden, Chris
    Elm, Jordan
    Sen, Souvik
    George, Mark S.
    Bonilha, Leonardo
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2018, 75 (12) : 1470 - 1476
  • [30] Pediatric and adult vision restoration after optic nerve sheath decompression for idiopathic intracranial hypertension
    Bersani, Thomas A.
    Meeker, Austin R.
    Sismanis, Dimitrios N.
    Carruth, Bryant P.
    ORBIT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ORBITAL DISORDERS AND FACIAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 35 (03): : 132 - 139