Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:90
|
作者
Gall, Carolin [1 ]
Schmidt, Sein [2 ]
Schittkowski, Michael P. [3 ]
Antal, Andrea [4 ]
Ambrus, Geza Gergely [4 ]
Paulus, Walter [4 ]
Dannhauer, Moritz [5 ,6 ]
Michalik, Romualda [1 ]
Mante, Alf [2 ]
Bola, Michal [1 ]
Lux, Anke [7 ]
Kropf, Siegfried [7 ]
Brandt, Stephan A. [2 ]
Sabel, Bernhard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Med, Inst Med Psychol, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Ophthalmol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Utah, Ctr Integrat Biomed Comp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Utah, Sci Comp & Imaging Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Magdeburg, Inst Biometry & Med Informat, Magdeburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN-STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IMPROVES VISION; FIELDS; EEG;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0156134
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Vision loss after optic neuropathy is considered irreversible. Here, repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied in partially blind patients with the goal of activating their residual vision. Methods We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in an ambulatory setting with daily application of rtACS (n = 45) or sham-stimulation (n = 37) for 50 min for a duration of 10 week days. A volunteer sample of patients with optic nerve damage (mean age 59.1 yrs) was recruited. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was super-threshold visual fields with 48 hrs after the last treatment day and at 2-months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were near-threshold visual fields, reaction time, visual acuity, and resting-state EEGs to assess changes in brain physiology. Results The rtACS-treated group had a mean improvement in visual field of 24.0% which was significantly greater than after sham-stimulation (2.5%). This improvement persisted for at least 2 months in terms of both within-and between-group comparisons. Secondary analyses revealed improvements of near-threshold visual fields in the central 5 degrees and increased thresholds in static perimetry after rtACS and improved reaction times, but visual acuity did not change compared to shams. Visual field improvement induced by rtACS was associated with EEG power-spectra and coherence alterations in visual cortical networks which are interpreted as signs of neuromodulation. Current flow simulation indicates current in the frontal cortex, eye, and optic nerve and in the subcortical but not in the cortical regions. Conclusion rtACS treatment is a safe and effective means to partially restore vision after optic nerve damage probably by modulating brain plasticity. This class 1 evidence suggests that visual fields can be improved in a clinically meaningful way.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation: a clinical observational study
    Fedorov, A.
    Jobke, S.
    Bersnev, V.
    Chibisova, A.
    Chibisova, Y.
    Gall, C.
    Sabel, B. A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2011, 4 (04) : 189 - 201
  • [3] Transorbital alternating current in optic neuropathy: December 2016. Opinion of the DOG and BVA on “Gall C et al. Alternating current stimulation for vision restoration after optic nerve damage: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2016”
    Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft, Berufsverband der Augenarzte Deutschlands e.V
    Der Ophthalmologe, 2017, 114 (2): : 132 - 133
  • [5] Restoration of vision with non-invasive electrical brain synchronization after optic nerve damage
    Fedorov, A.
    Jobke, S.
    Bersnev, V.
    Chibisova, A.
    Chibisova, Y.
    Gall, C.
    Sabel, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 : 40 - 40
  • [6] Efficacy of vision restoration therapy after optic neuritis (VISION study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Johann Schinzel
    Lina Schwarzlose
    Holger Dietze
    Karolina Bartusch
    Susanne Weiss
    Stephanie Ohlraun
    Friedemann Paul
    Jan Dörr
    Trials, 13
  • [7] Efficacy of vision restoration therapy after optic neuritis (VISION study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Schinzel, Johann
    Schwarzlose, Lina
    Dietze, Holger
    Bartusch, Karolina
    Weiss, Susanne
    Ohlraun, Stephanie
    Paul, Friedemann
    Doerr, Jan
    TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [8] Transcorneal alternating current stimulation induces EEG "aftereffects" only in rats with an intact visual system but not after severe optic nerve damage
    Sergeeva, Elena G.
    Fedorov, Anton B.
    Henrich-Noack, Petra
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 108 (09) : 2494 - 2500
  • [9] Vision Restoration Training for Glaucoma A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    Gudlin, Julia
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 132 (04) : 381 - 389
  • [10] A machine learning framework to optimize optic nerve electrical stimulation for vision restoration
    Romeni S.
    Zoccolan D.
    Micera S.
    Patterns, 2021, 2 (07):