Students' Perception and Performance Regarding Structured Query Language Through Online and Face-to-Face Learning

被引:5
|
作者
Elalouf, Amir [1 ]
Edelman, Arik [1 ,2 ]
Sever, Dafna [1 ]
Cohen, Shaked [1 ]
Ovadia, Reut [1 ]
Agami, Omer [1 ]
Shayhet, Yulia [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Management, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] ISRAPORT, Rishon Lez, Israel
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; face-to-face learning; online learning; SQL; students performance; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SATISFACTION; IMPACT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2022.935997
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study explores the Structured Query Language (SQL) learners' perceptions in online and face-to-face learning regarding the role of the instructor, clarity in lesson delivery and understanding, and concerns about the shift in learning mode. In parallel, we evaluate the performance of online and face-to-face SQL learners in the final examination. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced educational institutes to shift their activities online. Thus, online learning has been accepted during the pandemic and gradually evolving. The literature on online and face-to-face learning has evaluated limited variables. Yet, in online and face-to-face learning, critical parameters concerning the SQL learners' perceptions about the role of instructors have not been explored. The present study surveyed the final-year students learning medium-level SQL courses at Bar-Ilan University Israel and the College of Management Academic Studies Israel. Survey questionnaires included demographic information, online learning experience, online learning sources, and ten questions about the learners' concerns of shifting, effectiveness, adequate instructions, the lecturer's clarity during instruction, clear understanding of the lesson, instructor's tools, instructor's availability, satisfactory response, learning independence, and spending extra time in online and face-to-face learning, separately. This study included 102 online learners and 95 face-to-face learners. All the online learners used Zoom and WhatsApp, and the face-to-face learners used Gmail and WhatsApp. Both online and face-to-face learners were significantly satisfied with the lecturer's performance, especially with the clarity in lecture delivery, instructor availability, and satisfactory response from the lecturer. In addition, online learners agreed upon the effective way of learning, clear understanding of the lesson, independence, and spending extra time. In contrast, face-to-face learners were more satisfied with the tools of the lecturer and dissatisfied with the dependence on the lecturer. Female students attending face-to-face learning were more concerned about the shift in the mode of learning. Further, online learners performed better in written examinations and face-to-face learners in oral examinations. Notwithstanding, advancements are still required to redesign the online learning environment for critical thinking in higher education.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Analysis of Influencing Factors of College Students' Learning Effect in Face-to-Face, Online and Blended Learning
    Tong, Jun
    Han, Jun
    Liu, Jing
    Yang, Fan
    Chen, Shuo
    [J]. NETWORK COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SECURITY, 2012, 345 : 528 - 538
  • [22] Language Learners' Attitudes Toward Online and Face-To-Face Language Environments
    Alhamami, Munassir
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [24] Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
    Munassir Alhamami
    [J]. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16
  • [25] Connectivity: A Framework for Understanding Effective Language Teaching in Face-to-face and Online Learning Communities
    Senior, Rose
    [J]. RELC JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [26] EMPOWERING FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING WITH ONLINE LEARNING AT UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL
    Arnal, Ana
    Galindo, Carlos
    Gregori, Pablo
    Martinez, Vicente
    [J]. INTED2017: 11TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2017, : 742 - 747
  • [27] University Students' Perspectives of Face-to-face and Online Education: A Language Learning Comparison Prior and During Covid-19
    Fernandez Malpartida, Walter Miguel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTION, 2023, 16 (04) : 707 - 724
  • [28] Students' Engagement in Collaborative Active Learning - Online v.s. Face-to-Face
    Jin, Karen H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 53RD ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE 2022), VOL 2, 2022, : 1135 - 1135
  • [29] TEAMWORK THROUGH TEAM BUILDING: FACE-TO-FACE TO ONLINE
    Staggers, Julie
    Garcia, Susan
    Nagelhout, Ed
    [J]. BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2008, 71 (04) : 472 - 487
  • [30] Applying 'Active Learning' by Online and Face-to-Face Instructors
    Pundak, David
    Herscovitz, Orit
    Shacham, Miri
    [J]. IMSCI'11: THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SOCIETY, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL II, 2011, : 140 - 145