Students' Engagement in Collaborative Active Learning - Online v.s. Face-to-Face

被引:0
|
作者
Jin, Karen H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Manchester, NH 03101 USA
关键词
active learning; online synchronous learning; student engagement;
D O I
10.1145/3478432.3499107
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Teaching programming-intensive courses in a virtual space brings new opportunities for active learning and student engagement. This poster presents our experience in designing an online active learning environment in two programming-intensive courses delivered in a hybrid modality with all students alternating between online synchronous and face-to-face class meetings. We present the course strategies that support online active learning and a comparison of students' engagement between online and Face-to-Face (F2F) group activities. We highlight our active learning strategies including dynamic breakout room configuration and online group programming collaboration. A survey study is used to investigate how students' engagement in group activities varies between the two settings. Preliminary results show that the students' responses are highly positive over two engagement factors, the values of activities and their personal effort, with no statistically significant difference found between the two modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1135
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Applying 'Active Learning' by Online and Face-to-Face Instructors
    Pundak, David
    Herscovitz, Orit
    Shacham, Miri
    [J]. IMSCI'11: THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SOCIETY, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL II, 2011, : 140 - 145
  • [2] Online versus Face-to-face Collaborative Learning: Perceptions of Students and Instructors of Technical Writing for Engineers
    Morsi, Wesam Khairy
    Assem, Hala Medhat
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON), 2021, : 1577 - 1587
  • [3] Comparison of Communication Patterns of Students in Online and Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning Environments with Discourse Analysis
    Mutlu-Bayraktar, Duygu
    Donmez, Nesrin Ozdener
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGIST, 2015, 22 (02): : 265 - 275
  • [4] The effect of online and face-to-face active learning methods on learning attitudes
    Ozozturk, Sevcan
    Guler, Buse
    Bilgic, Dilek
    Ozberk, Huelya
    Yagcan, Hande
    Tokat, Merlinda Alus
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2023, 129
  • [5] Exploring the influence of students' perceptions of face-to-face collaboration on cognitive engagement and learning outcomes in collaborative programming
    Liu, Zhi
    Gao, Ya
    Yang, Yuqin
    Kong, Xi
    Zhao, Liang
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2024, 248
  • [6] Exploring Effects of Online and Face-to-Face Teaching Formats on Students' Interest and Engagement
    Marquardt, Kai
    Happe, Lucia
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH WIPSCE CONFERENCE IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH, WIPSCE 2023, 2023,
  • [7] The acceptance model of online learning by face-to-face higher education students
    Martinho, Domingos
    Jorge, Idalina
    Brites, Rui
    [J]. 2015 10TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2015,
  • [8] Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning
    Paechter, Manuela
    Maier, Brigitte
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04): : 292 - 297
  • [9] Comparing the roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning
    Suthers, DD
    Hundhausen, CD
    Girardeau, LE
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2003, 41 (04) : 335 - 351
  • [10] Beyond Collaborative Learning: a Comparison of Small Groups in Face-to-Face and Online Settings
    Xiaomei Song
    Michael Elftman
    [J]. Medical Science Educator, 2024, 34 : 379 - 385