Illegal use of natural resources in federal protected areas of the Brazilian Amazon

被引:26
|
作者
Kauano, Erico E. [1 ,2 ]
Silva, Jose M. C. [1 ,3 ]
Michalski, Fernanda [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Amapa, Programa Posgrad Biodiversidade Trop, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[2] Inst Chico Mendes Conservacao Biodiversidade, Parque Nacl Montanhas Tumucumaque, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[3] Univ Miami, Dept Geog Geog & Reg Studies, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[4] Univ Fed Amapa, Lab Ecol & Conservacao Vertebrados, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[5] Inst Procarnivoros, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
PEERJ | 2017年 / 5卷
关键词
Illegal activities; Protected areas; Conservation; Natural resources; Amazon; RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE; MARINE RESERVES; DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; POPULATION; INSIGHTS; MODELS; POLICY; PARKS;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.3902
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. The Brazilian Amazon is the world's largest rainforest regions and plays a key role in biodiversity conservation as well as climate adaptation and mitigation. The government has created a network of protected areas (PAs) to ensure long-term conservation of the region. However, despite the importance of and positive advances in the establishment of PAs, natural resource depletion in the Brazilian Amazon is pervasive. Methods. We evaluated a total of 4,243 official law enforcement records generated between 2010 and 2015 to understand the geographical distribution of the illegal use of resources in federal PAs in the Brazilian Amazon. We classified illegal activities into ten categories and used generalized additive models (GAMs) to evaluate the relationship between illegal use of natural resources inside PAs with management type, age of PAs, population density, and accessibility. Results. We found 27 types of illegal use of natural resources that were grouped into 10 categories of illegal activities. Most infractions were related to suppression and degradation of vegetation (37.40%), followed by illegal fishing (27.30%) and hunting activities (18.20%). The explanatory power of the GAMs was low for all categories of illegal activity, with a maximum explained variation of 41.2% for illegal activities as a whole, and a minimum of 14.6% for hunting activities. Discussion. These findings demonstrate that even though PAs are fundamental for nature conservation in the Brazilian Amazon, the pressures and threats posed by human activities include a broad range of illegal uses of natural resources. Population density up to 50 km from a PA is a key variable, influencing illegal activities. These threats endanger long-term conservation and many efforts are still needed to maintain PAs that are large enough and sufficiently intact to maintain ecosystem functions and protect biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Management system of protected areas for sustainable use of natural resources
    Gungor, B. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (02): : 434 - 441
  • [2] Efficiently targeting resources to deter illegal activities in protected areas
    Plumptre, Andrew J.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Rwetsiba, Aggrey
    Wanyama, Fredrick
    Kujirakwinja, Deo
    Driciru, Margaret
    Nangendo, Grace
    Watson, James E. M.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2014, 51 (03) : 714 - 725
  • [3] Forest conservation in Indigenous territories and protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon
    Qin, Yuanwei
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Liu, Fang
    de Sa e Silva, Fabio
    Shimabukuro, Yosio
    Arai, Egidio
    Fearnside, Philip Martin
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6 (03) : 295 - +
  • [4] Forest conservation in Indigenous territories and protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon
    Yuanwei Qin
    Xiangming Xiao
    Fang Liu
    Fabio de Sa e Silva
    Yosio Shimabukuro
    Egidio Arai
    Philip Martin Fearnside
    [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6 : 295 - 305
  • [5] Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation
    Soares-Filho, Britaldo
    Moutinho, Paulo
    Nepstad, Daniel
    Anderson, Anthony
    Rodrigues, Hermann
    Garcia, Ricardo
    Dietzsch, Laura
    Merry, Frank
    Bowman, Maria
    Hissa, Leticia
    Silvestrini, Rafaella
    Maretti, Claudio
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (24) : 10821 - 10826
  • [6] Importance of Protected Areas by Brazilian States to Reduce Deforestation in the Amazon
    Sousa, Marcos V. L.
    Melo, Silas N.
    Souza, Juciana C. B.
    Silva, Carlos F. A.
    Feitosa, Yuri
    Matias, Lindon F.
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [7] Does the Selective Erasure of Protected Areas Raise Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?
    Keles, Derya
    Pfaff, Alexander
    Mascia, Michael B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2023, 10 (04) : 1121 - 1147
  • [8] Integrating ecosystem management, protected areas, and mammal conservation in the Brazilian Amazon
    Azevedo-Ramos, Claudia
    do Amaral, Benedito Domingues
    Nepstad, Daniel C.
    Soares Filho, Britaldo
    Nasi, Robert
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (02):
  • [9] Challenges of Participatory Community Monitoring of Biodiversity in Protected Areas in Brazilian Amazon
    Costa, Daniel C.
    Pereira, Henrique S.
    Marchand, Guillaume A. E. L.
    Silva, Suzy C. P.
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [10] Public support for protected areas in new forest frontiers in the Brazilian Amazon
    Albuquerque Cunha, Helenilza Ferreira
    de Souza, Adriano Ferreira
    da Silva, Jose Maria Cardoso
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 46 (04) : 278 - 284