Illegal use of natural resources in federal protected areas of the Brazilian Amazon

被引:26
|
作者
Kauano, Erico E. [1 ,2 ]
Silva, Jose M. C. [1 ,3 ]
Michalski, Fernanda [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Amapa, Programa Posgrad Biodiversidade Trop, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[2] Inst Chico Mendes Conservacao Biodiversidade, Parque Nacl Montanhas Tumucumaque, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[3] Univ Miami, Dept Geog Geog & Reg Studies, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[4] Univ Fed Amapa, Lab Ecol & Conservacao Vertebrados, Macapa, Amapa, Brazil
[5] Inst Procarnivoros, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
PEERJ | 2017年 / 5卷
关键词
Illegal activities; Protected areas; Conservation; Natural resources; Amazon; RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE; MARINE RESERVES; DEFORESTATION; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; POPULATION; INSIGHTS; MODELS; POLICY; PARKS;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.3902
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. The Brazilian Amazon is the world's largest rainforest regions and plays a key role in biodiversity conservation as well as climate adaptation and mitigation. The government has created a network of protected areas (PAs) to ensure long-term conservation of the region. However, despite the importance of and positive advances in the establishment of PAs, natural resource depletion in the Brazilian Amazon is pervasive. Methods. We evaluated a total of 4,243 official law enforcement records generated between 2010 and 2015 to understand the geographical distribution of the illegal use of resources in federal PAs in the Brazilian Amazon. We classified illegal activities into ten categories and used generalized additive models (GAMs) to evaluate the relationship between illegal use of natural resources inside PAs with management type, age of PAs, population density, and accessibility. Results. We found 27 types of illegal use of natural resources that were grouped into 10 categories of illegal activities. Most infractions were related to suppression and degradation of vegetation (37.40%), followed by illegal fishing (27.30%) and hunting activities (18.20%). The explanatory power of the GAMs was low for all categories of illegal activity, with a maximum explained variation of 41.2% for illegal activities as a whole, and a minimum of 14.6% for hunting activities. Discussion. These findings demonstrate that even though PAs are fundamental for nature conservation in the Brazilian Amazon, the pressures and threats posed by human activities include a broad range of illegal uses of natural resources. Population density up to 50 km from a PA is a key variable, influencing illegal activities. These threats endanger long-term conservation and many efforts are still needed to maintain PAs that are large enough and sufficiently intact to maintain ecosystem functions and protect biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MAN, MEDIUM AND THE USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE AMAZON
    da Silva, Christian
    [J]. GEOAMBIENTE ON-LINE, 2006, (06): : 35 - 51
  • [22] Total mercury in wild felids occurring in protected areas in the central Brazilian Amazon
    Branco Lopes, Marcelly Castello
    de Carvalho, Gabriel Oliveira
    Bernardo, Robson Roney
    Macedo, Joana
    Lino, Adan Santos
    Ramalho, Emiliano Esterci
    Kasper, Daniele
    Meire, Rodrigo Ornellas
    Machado Torres, Joao Paulo
    Malm, Olaf
    [J]. ACTA AMAZONICA, 2020, 50 (02) : 142 - +
  • [23] Protecting the Amazon with protected areas
    Walker, Robert
    Moore, Nathan J.
    Arima, Eugenio
    Perz, Stephen
    Simmons, Cynthia
    Caldas, Marcellus
    Vergara, Dante
    Bohrer, Claudio
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (26) : 10582 - 10586
  • [24] The Use of Violence in Illegal Markets: Evidence from Mahogany Trade in the Brazilian Amazon
    Chimeli, Ariaster B.
    Soares, Rodr R.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 9 (04) : 30 - 57
  • [25] Proposed indicators of tourism competitiveness resources in protected natural areas
    Blanco Cerradelo, Lidia
    Dieguez Castrillon, Ma Isabel
    Gueimonde Canto, Ana
    [J]. PASOS-REVISTA DE TURISMO Y PATRIMONIO CULTURAL, 2015, 13 (04) : 947 - 957
  • [26] Use of intertidal areas by shrimps (Decapoda) in a brazilian Amazon estuary
    Sampaio, Hebert A.
    Martinelli-Lemos, Jussara M.
    [J]. ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2014, 86 (01): : 333 - 345
  • [27] Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon
    Nolte, Christoph
    Agrawal, Arun
    Silvius, Kirsten M.
    Soares-Filho, Britaldo S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (13) : 4956 - 4961
  • [28] Protected areas as strategies for preserving vegetation cover in the vicinity of hydroelectric projects in the Brazilian Amazon
    Orleno Marques da Silva Junior
    Marco Aurélio dos Santos
    Claudio Fabian Szlafsztein
    Jose Manoel Antelo Gomez
    Juliana Pinto Pereira
    [J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8
  • [29] Technical and Institutional Innovation in Agroforestry for Protected Areas Management in the Brazilian Amazon: Opportunities and Limitations
    Götz Schroth
    Maria do Socorro S. da Mota
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2013, 52 : 427 - 440
  • [30] Protected areas as strategies for preserving vegetation cover in the vicinity of hydroelectric projects in the Brazilian Amazon
    da Silva Junior, Orleno Marques
    dos Santos, Marco Aurelio
    Szlafsztein, Claudio Fabian
    Antelo Gomez, Jose Manoel
    Pereira, Juliana Pinto
    [J]. ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 8