Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens

被引:46
|
作者
Vincelette, J
Schirm, J
Bogard, M
Bourgault, AM
Luijt, DS
Bianchi, A
Vader, PCV
Butcher, A
Rosenstraus, M
机构
[1] CHU Montreal, Dept Microbiol Med & Infectiol, Montreal, PQ H2X 3J4, Canada
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Reg Publ Hlth Lab, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Hosp Meaux, Unite Biol Mol, Meaux, France
[5] Inst Alfred Fournier, Virol Lab, Paris, France
[6] Roche Mol Syst, Branchburg, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.37.1.74-80.1999
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis was evaluated in a multicenter trial. Test performance was evaluated for 2,014 endocervical swab and 1,278 urine specimens obtained from women and for 373 urethral swab and 254 urine specimens obtained from men. Culture served as the reference test. Culture-negative, COBAS AMPLICOR-positive specimens that tested positive in a confirmatory PCR test for an alternative target sequence within the C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein gene were resolved as true positives. The overall prevalence of chlamydia was 4.3% in cervical swabs and 11.0% in urethral swabs from men. When the results for each specimen type were considered separately the resolved sensitivities were 96.5% (83 of 86) for endocervical swab specimens, 95.1% (39 of 41) for urine specimens from women, 100.0% (41 of 41) for urethral swab specimens from men, and 94.4% (17 of 18) for urine specimens from men; the resolved specificities were 99.4% (1,912 of 1,924) for endocervical swab specimens, 99.8% (1,204 of 1,207) for urine specimens from women, 98.5% (325 of 330) for urethral swab specimens from men, and 100.0% (236 of 236) for urine specimens from men. For the subset of patients from whom both swab and urine specimens were collected, the combined results for both specimen types were used to identify all infected patients. Using these combined results as criteria, the resolved sensitivities for the COBAS AMPLICOR test were 82.6% (38 of 46) for endocervical swab specimens, 84.4% (38 of 45) for urine specimens from women, 84.2% (16 of 19) for urethral swab specimens from men, and 89.5% (17 of 19) for urine specimens from men. In comparison, the sensitivity of culture was only 56.5% (26 of 46) for endocervical specimens and 63.2% (12 of 19) for urethral specimens from men. The internal control provided in the COBAS AMPLICOR test revealed that 2.9% of specimens were inhibitory when they were initially tested. Nevertheless, valid results were obtained for 99.1% of specimens because 68.7% of the inhibitory specimens were not inhibitory when a second aliquot of the original sample was tested. Two additional COBAS AMPLICOR-positive specimens were detected by retesting inhibitory specimens. The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for the detection of C. trachomatis exhibited equally high sensitivities and specificities with both urogenital swab and urine specimens and, thus, is well-suited for use in screening.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multicenter evaluation of the AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis
    Van der Pol, B
    Quinn, TC
    Gaydos, CA
    Crotchfelt, K
    Schachter, J
    Moncada, J
    Jungkind, D
    Martin, DH
    Turner, B
    Peyton, C
    Jones, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (03) : 1105 - 1112
  • [2] Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens
    Pasternack, R
    Vuorinen, P
    Pitkajarvi, T
    Koskela, M
    Miettinen, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (02) : 402 - 405
  • [3] Evaluation of COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche):: Accuracy in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by coamplification of endocervical specimens
    Livengood, CH
    Wrenn, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (08) : 2928 - 2932
  • [4] Evaluation of an automated extraction method for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Cobas Amplicor PCR from different sample materials
    Geertsen, Ralf
    Friderich, Paul
    Dobec, Marinko
    Emler, Stefan
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 39 (05) : 405 - 408
  • [5] Detection of PCR inhibitors in cervical specimens by using the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis assay
    Verkooyen, RP
    Luijendijk, A
    Huisman, WM
    Goessens, WHF
    Kluytmans, JAJW
    vanRijsoortVos, JH
    Verbrugh, HA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (12) : 3072 - 3074
  • [6] Detection of male genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using an automated multiplex PCR system (Cobas® Amplicor™)
    Higgins, SP
    Klapper, PE
    Struthers, JK
    Bailey, AS
    Gough, AP
    Moore, R
    Corbitt, G
    Bhattacharyya, MN
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 1998, 9 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [7] Validation of roche COBAS amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in rectal and pharyngeal specimens by an omp1 PCR assay
    Lister, NA
    Tabrizi, SN
    Fairley, CK
    Garland, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (01) : 239 - 241
  • [8] Evaluation of the Vidas Chlamydia test to detect and verify Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens
    Schachter, J
    Jones, RB
    Butler, RC
    Rice, B
    Brooks, D
    VanderPol, B
    Gray, M
    Moncada, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (08) : 2102 - 2106
  • [9] Reproducibility problems with the AMPLICOR PCR Chlamydia trachomatis test
    Peterson, EM
    Darrow, V
    Blanding, J
    Aarnaes, S
    delaMaza, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (04) : 957 - 959
  • [10] Cobas® 4800: a fully automated system for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
    Van der Pol, Barbara
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 13 (02) : 131 - 140