Comparative Analysis of Ecological Rucksack Between Open-pit and Underground Coal Mine

被引:12
|
作者
Chu Daozhong [1 ]
Zhu Qingli [2 ]
Wang Jie [1 ]
Zhao Xiaozhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Coll Resources & Environm Engn, Zibo 255049, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Coll Resources & Civil Engn, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
关键词
Open-pit coal mine; Underground coal mine; Ecological pressure; Ecological rucksack;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.196
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Coal is the major energy in China, which always account for more than 70% in the structure of consumer demand for primary energy. on the one hand, coal mining provides us with the main energy, on the other hand, it gives a tremendous pressure on ecology in the mining process. Comparative analysis of ecological pressure between open-pit and underground coal mine with using the method of ecological burden. The result shows, the total ecological burden and the coefficient of ecological burden of open-pit are 4.31 to 11.36 times and 2.77 to 7.74 times of underground coal mine's respectively. Meanwhile, It is the main method by adopt measures such as pay attention to the mining section and improving technology to reduce the amount of stripping and tunneling, and lower the electricity consumption and improve the water cycling utilization ratio, as well as adopt the clean energy and biological energy to reduce the ecological pressure of coal mine. Underground coal mining is recommended if the two mining methods are allowed. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of RIUDS
引用
收藏
页码:1116 / 1120
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Influence of Rainfall on Landslide Stability of an Open-Pit Mine: The Case of Haizhou Open-Pit Mine
    An Bo
    Zhu Chun
    Liu Kuiming
    Li Sitong
    Tao Zhigang
    Li Haipeng
    Yu Haoran
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 37 (04) : 3367 - 3378
  • [32] Energy analysis of open-pit coal mining
    M. V. Kurlenya
    A. S. Tanaino
    [J]. Journal of Mining Science, 1997, 33 : 453 - 462
  • [33] End-wall slope stability analysis of surface coal mine under the combined open-pit mining with underground mining
    Peng, Hongge
    Cai, Qingxiang
    Ma, Li
    Tang, Wenliang
    [J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 19 G : 185 - 194
  • [34] Stability and Deformation Analysis for Excavation and Backfilling of Fushun West Open-pit Coal Mine
    Yan Yongcheng
    Ling Xianzhang
    Zhang Feng
    Wang Jiahui
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 353-356 : 751 - 755
  • [35] Effect of Coalbed Methane Well Fracturing on Slope Stability of Open-Pit Coal Mine: A Case Study of Shengli East No. 2 Open-Pit Coal Mine
    Zhu, Qingzhong
    Wang, Bo
    Zhao, Xin
    Liu, Chunchun
    Yu, Qing
    Zhang, Liwen
    Hou, Tao
    Sang, Guangjie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [36] Analysis of the Open-pit to Underground Mining Slope Stability
    Bao Guangming
    Chang Juan
    LIU Zhigang
    [J]. GREEN POWER, MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS III, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 484-485 : 599 - +
  • [37] Near-natural ecological restoration in open-pit mine area
    Lei, Shaogang
    Xia, Jianan
    Bian, Zhengfu
    Cheng, Wei
    [J]. Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2024, 49 (04): : 2021 - 2030
  • [38] Geo-ecological impact of the Kremikovzi open-pit mine in Bulgaria
    Berov, BL
    Angelova, D
    [J]. EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 6, 2000, : 4451 - 4454
  • [39] China's Largest Open-Pit Coal Mine Ready for Production
    不详
    [J]. E&MJ-ENGINEERING AND MINING JOURNAL, 2008, 209 (09): : 26 - 26
  • [40] ICT Technologies in Optimization of Machines Movement at Open-Pit Coal Mine
    Ivanovic, Milos
    Skataric, Dobrila
    [J]. TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2019, 26 (04): : 1152 - 1158