Calculations of neutron dose equivalent exposures from range-modulated proton therapy beams

被引:102
|
作者
Polf, JC
Newhauser, WD
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Unit 130, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 50卷 / 16期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/014
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Passive beam spreading techniques have been used for most proton therapy treatments worldwide. This delivery method employs static scattering foils to spread the beam laterally and a range modulating wheel or ridge filter to spread the high dose region in depth to provide a uniform radiation dose to the treatment volume. Neutrons produced by interactions of the treatment beam with nozzle components, such as the range modulation wheel, can account for a large portion of the secondary dose delivered to healthy tissue outside the treatment volume. Despite this fact, little is known about the effects of range modulation on the secondary neutron exposures around passively scattered proton treatment nozzles. In this work, the neutron dose equivalent spectra per incident proton (H(E)/p) and total neutron dose equivalent per therapeutic absorbed dose (H/D) were studied using Monte Carlo techniques for various values of range modulation at 54 locations around a passive scattering proton therapy treatment nozzle. As the range modulator wheel step thickness increased from 1.0 to 11.5 cm, the peak values of H(E)/p decreased from approximately 1 x 10(-17) mSv Gy(-1) to approximately 2 x 10(-18) mSv Gy(-1) at 50 cm from isocentre along the beam's central axis. In general, H/D increased with increasing range modulation at all locations studied, and the maximum H/D exposures shifted away from isocentre.
引用
收藏
页码:3859 / 3873
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Range-modulated pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations
    Kohno, R.
    Takada, Y.
    Sakae, T.
    Nohtomi, A.
    Terunuma, T.
    Matsumoto, K.
    Matsuda, H.
    [J]. 2001, Japan Society of Applied Physics (40):
  • [2] Range-modulated pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations
    Kohno, R
    Takada, Y
    Sakae, T
    Nohtomi, A
    Terunuma, T
    Matsumoto, K
    Matsuda, H
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS PART 1-REGULAR PAPERS SHORT NOTES & REVIEW PAPERS, 2001, 40 (08): : 5187 - 5193
  • [3] On measuring depth-dose distribution of range-modulated proton therapy fields
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (07) : 2362 - 2368
  • [4] Patient neutron dose equivalent exposures outside of the proton therapy treatment field
    Polf, JC
    Newhauser, WD
    Titt, U
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 115 (1-4) : 154 - 158
  • [5] Effect of range modulation on neutron dose equivalent exposures around a passive scattering proton therapy treatment nozzle
    Polf, J
    Newhauser, W
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2164 - 2164
  • [6] Measurements of neutron dose equivalent for a proton therapy center using uniform scanning proton beams
    Zheng, Yuanshui
    Liu, Yaxi
    Zeidan, Omar
    Schreuder, Andries Niek
    Keole, Sameer
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3484 - 3492
  • [7] Measured output factors for range-modulated spread-out Bragg peak proton beams
    Hsi, W
    Allgower, C
    Farr, J
    Mascia, A
    Fanelli, L
    Tylor, L
    Thornton, A
    Schreuder, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2030 - 2030
  • [8] Measurements of Neutron Dose Equivalent for Uniform Scanning Proton Beams
    Zheng, Y.
    Liu, Y.
    Zeidan, O.
    Schreuder, A.
    Keole, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3720 - +
  • [9] Scattered neutron dose equivalent to a fetus from proton therapy of the mother
    Roy, SC
    Sandison, GA
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 71 (3-4) : 997 - 998
  • [10] Ambient neutron dose equivalent during proton therapy using wobbling scanning system: Measurements and calculations
    Lin, Yung-Chieh
    Lee, Chung-Chi
    Chao, Tsi-Chian
    Tsai, Hui-Yu
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 290 - 294