Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment

被引:16
|
作者
Jarman, Julian W. E. [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Wajid [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Markides, Vias [1 ,2 ]
March, Jamie [3 ]
Goldstein, Laura [3 ]
Liao, Ray [4 ]
Kalsekar, Iftekhar [5 ]
Chitnis, Abhishek [5 ]
Khanna, Rahul [5 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll, Royal Brompton Hosp, NIHR Cardiovasc Res Unit, Heart Rhythm Ctr, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] Johnson & Johnson, Franchise Hlth Econ & Market Access, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Janssen R&D US, Raritan, NJ USA
[5] Johnson & Johnson, Med Device Epidemiol, 410 George St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Anti-arrhythmic drugs; RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION; COMORBIDITY INDEX; THERAPY; STROKE; COST; EPIDEMIC; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1186/s12872-018-0946-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe objective of our study was to compare resource use and clinical outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment.MethodsA retrospective cohort design using the Clinical Practice Research Data-Hospital Episode Statistics linkage data from England (2008-2013) was used. Patients undergoing catheter ablation treatment for AF were indexed to the date of first procedure. AAD patients with at least two different AAD drugs were indexed to the first fill of the second AAD. Patients were matched using 1:1 propensity matching. Primary endpoints including inpatient and outpatient visits were compared between ablation and AAD cohorts in the 4months-1year period after index. Secondary endpoints including heart failure, stroke, cardioversion, mortality, and a composite outcome were compared for the 4months-3years post-index period in the two groups. Cox-proportional hazards models were estimated for clinical outcomes comparison.ResultsA total of 558 patients were matched in the two groups for resource utilization comparison. The average number of cardiovascular (CV)-related outpatient visits in the 4-12months post-index period were significantly lower in the ablation group versus the AAD group (1.76 vs 3.57, p<.0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause and CV-related inpatient visits and all-cause outpatient visits among the two groups. For secondary endpoints comparison, 615 matched patients in each group emerged. Ablation patients had 38% lower risk of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p=0.0318), 50% lower risk of mortality (HR 0.50, p=0.0082), and 43% lower risk of experiencing a composite outcome (HR 0.57, p=0.0009) as compared to AAD treatment cohort.ConclusionAF ablation was associated with significantly lower CV-related outpatient visits, and lower risk of heart failure and mortality versus AAD therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Total atrioventricular nodal ablation increases atrial fibrillation burden in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation despite continuation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy
    Willems, R
    Wyse, DG
    Gillis, AM
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (12) : 1296 - 1301
  • [42] Incidence and clinical significance of transformation of atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter in patients undergoing long-term antiarrhythmic drug treatment
    Riva, S
    Tondo, C
    Carbucicchio, C
    Galimberti, P
    Fassini, G
    Della Bella, P
    EUROPACE, 1999, 1 (04): : 242 - 247
  • [43] Rhythm Control for Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Balancing the Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs and Catheter Ablation
    Viles-Gonzalez, Juan F.
    Fuster, Valentin
    Halperin, Jonathan
    Calkins, Hugh
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [44] Is Catheter Ablation Better Than Antiarrhythmic Drugs for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?
    Natarajan, Balaji
    Nayak, Srishti
    Pai, Ramdas G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2020, 29 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [45] CRYOABLATION VERSUS ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUG THERAPY AS INITIAL TREATMENT FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: IMPACT ON QUALITY OF LIFE
    Wazni, Oussama M.
    Dandamudi, Gopi
    Sood, Nitesh
    Hoyt, Robert
    Tyler, Jaret
    Durrani, Sarfraz
    Niebauer, Mark
    Makati, Kevin
    Halperin, Blair
    Gauri, Andre
    Morales, Gustavo
    Cerkvenik, Jeffrey
    Kaplon, Rachelle
    Nissen, Steven
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 225 - 225
  • [46] Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Li Zheng
    Mi Deng-Hai
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (16) : C166 - C166
  • [47] Maintaining stability of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: Antiarrhythmic drugs versus ablation
    Naccarelli G.V.
    Hynes J.
    Wolbrette D.L.
    Bhatta L.
    Khan M.
    Luck J.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2002, 4 (5) : 418 - 425
  • [48] Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation The A4 Study
    Jais, Pierre
    Cauchemez, Bruno
    Macle, Laurent
    Daoud, Emile
    Khairy, Paul
    Subbiah, Rajesh
    Hocini, Meleze
    Extramiana, Fabrice
    Sacher, Frederic
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Klein, George
    Weerasooriya, Rukshen
    Clementy, Jacques
    Haissaguerre, Michel
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (24) : 2498 - 2505
  • [49] A trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The APAF study
    DeSilvey, Dennis L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03): : 202 - 203
  • [50] Antiarrhythmic Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation
    Ledan, Seema
    US PHARMACIST, 2020, 45 (02) : 24 - 27