Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment

被引:16
|
作者
Jarman, Julian W. E. [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Wajid [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Markides, Vias [1 ,2 ]
March, Jamie [3 ]
Goldstein, Laura [3 ]
Liao, Ray [4 ]
Kalsekar, Iftekhar [5 ]
Chitnis, Abhishek [5 ]
Khanna, Rahul [5 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll, Royal Brompton Hosp, NIHR Cardiovasc Res Unit, Heart Rhythm Ctr, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] Johnson & Johnson, Franchise Hlth Econ & Market Access, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Janssen R&D US, Raritan, NJ USA
[5] Johnson & Johnson, Med Device Epidemiol, 410 George St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
来源
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Anti-arrhythmic drugs; RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION; COMORBIDITY INDEX; THERAPY; STROKE; COST; EPIDEMIC; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1186/s12872-018-0946-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe objective of our study was to compare resource use and clinical outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment.MethodsA retrospective cohort design using the Clinical Practice Research Data-Hospital Episode Statistics linkage data from England (2008-2013) was used. Patients undergoing catheter ablation treatment for AF were indexed to the date of first procedure. AAD patients with at least two different AAD drugs were indexed to the first fill of the second AAD. Patients were matched using 1:1 propensity matching. Primary endpoints including inpatient and outpatient visits were compared between ablation and AAD cohorts in the 4months-1year period after index. Secondary endpoints including heart failure, stroke, cardioversion, mortality, and a composite outcome were compared for the 4months-3years post-index period in the two groups. Cox-proportional hazards models were estimated for clinical outcomes comparison.ResultsA total of 558 patients were matched in the two groups for resource utilization comparison. The average number of cardiovascular (CV)-related outpatient visits in the 4-12months post-index period were significantly lower in the ablation group versus the AAD group (1.76 vs 3.57, p<.0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause and CV-related inpatient visits and all-cause outpatient visits among the two groups. For secondary endpoints comparison, 615 matched patients in each group emerged. Ablation patients had 38% lower risk of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p=0.0318), 50% lower risk of mortality (HR 0.50, p=0.0082), and 43% lower risk of experiencing a composite outcome (HR 0.57, p=0.0009) as compared to AAD treatment cohort.ConclusionAF ablation was associated with significantly lower CV-related outpatient visits, and lower risk of heart failure and mortality versus AAD therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy vs Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
    Srivatsa, Uma N.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (18): : 1809 - 1809
  • [32] Treatment Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review
    Karim, Moeed Ali
    Huang, Wei-Hsun
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [33] Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-analysis of Safety and Efficacy
    Yi, Fang
    Hou, Wenbo
    Zhou, Chao
    Yin, Yuxia
    Lu, Shoutao
    Duan, Cuihai
    Cao, MingKun
    Li, Maoquan
    Toft, Egon Steen
    Zhang, Haijun
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 73 (04) : 241 - 247
  • [34] Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation (CABANA) Trial: Study Rationale and Design
    Packer, Douglas L.
    Mark, Daniel B.
    Robb, Richard A.
    Monahan, Kristi H.
    Bahnson, Tristram D.
    Moretz, Kathleen
    Poole, Jeanne E.
    Mascette, Alice
    Rosenberg, Yves
    Jeffries, Neal
    Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
    Lee, Kerry L.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 199 : 192 - 199
  • [35] Effects of antiarrhythmic drug responsiveness and diagnosis-to-ablation time on outcomes after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation
    Kim, Hong-Ju
    Kim, Daehoon
    Kim, Kipoong
    Choi, Sung Hwa
    Kim, Moon-Hyun
    Park, Je-Wook
    Yu, Hee Tae
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    Uhm, Jae-Sun
    Joung, Boyoung
    Lee, Moon-Hyoung
    Pak, Hui-Nam
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024, 40 (04) : 867 - 878
  • [36] Antiarrhythmic prophylaxis in patients after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation
    Lodzinski, P.
    Kozluk, E.
    Kiliszek, M.
    Winkler, A.
    Piatkowska, A.
    Opolski, G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 286 - 287
  • [37] Stroke and Cardiovascular Events After Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Mansour, Moussa
    Heist, E. Kevin
    Agarwal, Rahul
    Bunch, T. Jared
    Karst, Edward
    Ruskin, Jeremy N.
    Mahapatra, Srijoy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 121 (10): : 1192 - 1199
  • [38] Use and Clinical Outcomes Associated with Urgent versus Elective Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in the United States
    Polsinelli, Vincenzo
    Qin, Li
    Minges, Karl
    Freeman, James
    Al-Khatib, Sana
    Bradley, Steven
    Ho, Michael
    Tzou, Wendy
    Varosy, Paul
    Hess, Paul
    Sandhu, Amneet
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [39] Clinical and economic outcomes associated with use of anti-arrhythmic drugs versus ablation in atrial fibrillation
    Ken-Opurum, Jennifer
    Srinivas, Sesha S. S.
    Park, Seojin
    Charland, Scott
    Revel, Andrew
    Preblick, Ronald
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [40] Outcomes of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
    Stiegler, KA
    Franks, AM
    Granberry, MC
    Hawkins, JB
    Smith, ES
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 23 (03): : 391 - 391