Manometric characteristics of the upper esophageal sphincter recorded with a microsleeve

被引:0
|
作者
DiRe, C [1 ]
Shi, GX [1 ]
Manka, M [1 ]
Kahrilas, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2001年 / 96卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: We compared manometric recordings of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) recorded with a miniature sleeve to those obtained using standard manometry. METHODS: The UES pressure of eight volunteer subjects was measured by station pull-through (SPT), by rapid pull-through (RPT), and with a microsleeve sensor for 30 min, followed by 15 mill of esophageal acid infusion. Deglutitive UES relaxation recorded with a microsleeve and solid state sensor were compared. RESULTS: The UES pressure recorded with the microsleeve (25 +/- 9 mm Hg) was significantly less than that by SPT (114 +/- 18 mm Hg) or RPT (152 +/- 19 mm Hg), and was unaffected by acid infusion. Periods of low UES pressure were observed during long interswallow intervals (II +/- 4, range 6-18 mm Hg). Deglutitive relaxation duration and intrabolus pressure measured with the microsleeve were less than those recorded by the solid state transducer. CONCLUSIONS: "Normal" UES pressure is heavily dependent on measurement, technique; pressures obtained with a miniature sleeve are a fraction of those obtained by SPT or RPT. During periods of relative comfort with minimal swallowing, UES tone is approximately 10 mm Hg, similar to that during sleep. Volume modulation of deglutitive UES relaxation is demonstrable with a microsleeve, albeit with less precision than with a solid-state transducer. (C) 2001 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1389
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Swallows in Upright Position Normalize Upper Esophageal Sphincter Manometric Recordings in Achalasia Patients
    Keihanian, Sara
    Yan, Yuanqing
    Chaudhry, Naueen
    Chavalitdhamrong, Disaya
    Li, Hui
    Jabbar, Haseeb
    Zhang, Qing
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S890 - S890
  • [32] COMPARISON OF OVAL AND ROUND CATHETERS FOR MANOMETRIC STUDIES OF UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURES IN MAN
    GREEN, WER
    CASTELL, JA
    CASTELL, DO
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1987, 92 (05) : 1414 - 1414
  • [33] Hyperdynamic Upper Esophageal Sphincter Pressure: A Manometric Observation in Patients Reporting Globus Sensation
    Kwiatek, Monika A.
    Mirza, Faiz
    Kahrilas, Peter J.
    Pandolfino, John E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (02): : 289 - 298
  • [34] MANOMETRIC EVALUATION OF LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER FUNCTION
    STEIN, HJ
    CROOKES, PF
    DEMEESTER, TR
    PROBLEMS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 1992, 9 (01): : 75 - 91
  • [35] The hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: A manometric curiosity?
    Law, S
    Ireland, AP
    Bremner, RM
    Bremner, CG
    Peters, JH
    Hagen, JA
    DeMeester, TR
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) : A173 - A173
  • [36] MANOMETRIC EFFECTS OF METOPIMAZINE ON THE LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER
    GOSSELIN, A
    GOSSELIN, M
    BRETAGNE, JF
    SEMAINE DES HOPITAUX, 1981, 57 (5-6): : 291 - 295
  • [37] IMPACT OF HIATAL HERNIA STATUS ON MANOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER (LES) AND ESOPHAGEAL BODY FUNCTION
    Ayazi, Shahin
    Zaidi, Ali H.
    Zheng, Ping
    Chovanec, Kristy L.
    Salvitti, Madison
    Omstead, Ashten N.
    Shen, Xinxin
    Komatsu, Yoshihiro
    Hoppo, Toshitaka
    Jobe, Blair A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S1412 - S1412
  • [38] UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER
    HARRIS, L
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1966, 50 (04) : 605 - &
  • [39] COMPARISON OF OVAL AND ROUND CATHETERS FOR MANOMETRIC STUDIES OF UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER (UES) PRESSURE IN MAN
    GREEN, W
    CASTELL, J
    CASTELL, D
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 91 (04) : 1054 - 1054
  • [40] THE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER DURING NORMAL DE-GLUTITION - A SIMULTANEOUS CINERADIOGRAPHIC AND MANOMETRIC INVESTIGATION
    ISBERG, A
    NILSSON, ME
    SCHIRATZKI, H
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1985, 26 (05): : 563 - 568