Clinical Benefit and Expedited Approval of Cancer Drugs in the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, and Australia

被引:22
|
作者
Hwang, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [3 ,4 ]
Tibau, Ariadna [5 ,6 ]
Lee, ChangWon C. [3 ,4 ]
Vokinger, Kerstin N. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Canc, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Canc Innovat & Regulat Initiat, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law Portal, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Oncol, Inst Invest Biomed St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Law, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ESMO-MAGNITUDE; THERAPEUTICS; COST; ASCO;
D O I
10.1200/OP.21.00909
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Regulatory agencies have sought to speed up the review of new cancer medicines and reduce delays in approval between countries. We examined trends in regulatory review times and association with clinical benefit for new cancer medicines in six jurisdictions: United States (Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), European Union (European Medicines Agency [EMA]), Switzerland (Swissmedic), Japan (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), Canada (Health Canada), and Australia (Therapeutic Goods Administration). METHODS: We studied all new cancer drugs approved in the six aforementioned jurisdictions from 2007 to 2020. We extracted all applicable expedited programs, total regulatory review times, and, for drugs first approved by the FDA, times to subsequent regulatory approval. Clinical benefit was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale value framework and ASCO-Cancer Research Committee's targets. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare total review times for high versus low clinical benefit drugs. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty eight drugs received initial approval in at least one of the six included jurisdictions. Most drugs approved by the FDA (91%) and Health Canada (59%) qualified for at least one expedited program within those jurisdictions, compared with 46% of EMA approvals and 18% of PMDA approvals. The FDA was the first regulator to approve 102 (80%) drugs. Delays in submission accounted for a median of 20.2% (EMA) to 83.8% (PMDA) of the time to subsequent approval. There was no association between high clinical benefit and shorter total review times. CONCLUSION: Most new cancer therapies were approved first by the FDA, and delays in submission of regulatory applications accounted for substantial delays in approving cancer drugs in other countries. Regulators should prioritize faster review for drugs with high clinical benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / E1532
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Socioeconomic Costs of Asthma in the European Union, United States and Canada: A Systematic Review
    Puig-Junoy, Jaume
    Pascual-Argente, Natalia
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2017, 91
  • [42] Sustainable Food Systems: Perspectives from the United States, Canada, and the European Union
    Tagtow, Angie
    Harmon, Alison
    JOURNAL OF HUNGER & ENVIRONMENTAL NUTRITION, 2008, 3 (2-3) : 103 - 105
  • [43] Clinical benefit of breakthrough cancer drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Molto, Consolacion
    Hwang, Thomas J.
    Andres, Marta
    Borrell, Maria
    Gich Saladich, Ignasi J.
    Barnadas, Agust
    Amir, Eitan
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    Tibau Martorell, Ariadna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [44] Survey of Privacy Law Developments in 2009: United States, Canada, and the European Union
    Siegel, Ariane
    Denny, William
    Poff, Kristen W.
    Larose, Cynthia
    Hale, Robert
    Hintze, Mike
    BUSINESS LAWYER, 2009, 65 (01): : 285 - 307
  • [45] Taxing Reforms: The Politics of the Consumption Tax in Japan, the United States, Canada and Australia
    Martin, Isaac W.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2009, 47 (01) : 192 - 193
  • [46] Taxing reforms: The politics of the consumption tax in Japan, the United States, Canada and Australia
    Bird, Richard M.
    CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2008, 51 (02): : 359 - 361
  • [47] Background Factors Contributing to Safety Warning Discordance in the Initial Labeling of New Drugs in Japan, the United States, and the European Union
    Fukuda, Koichi
    Narukawa, Mamoru
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 117 (03) : 779 - 786
  • [48] Decision and timing of safety-related labeling changes for new drugs in Japan: Comparison with the United States and the European Union
    Fukuda, Koichi
    Narukawa, Mamoru
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 32 (12) : 1331 - 1340
  • [49] The Evolving Paradigm for Clinical Development and Regulatory Approval of Antiretroviral Drugs in the United States
    David M. Cocchetto
    Lynn Smiley
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 1999, 33 (2): : 357 - 372
  • [50] The evolving paradigm for clinical development and regulatory approval of antiretroviral drugs in the United States
    Cocchetto, DM
    Smiley, L
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 1999, 33 (02): : 357 - 372