Clinical Benefit and Expedited Approval of Cancer Drugs in the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, and Australia

被引:22
|
作者
Hwang, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [3 ,4 ]
Tibau, Ariadna [5 ,6 ]
Lee, ChangWon C. [3 ,4 ]
Vokinger, Kerstin N. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Canc, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Canc Innovat & Regulat Initiat, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law Portal, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Oncol, Inst Invest Biomed St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Law, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ESMO-MAGNITUDE; THERAPEUTICS; COST; ASCO;
D O I
10.1200/OP.21.00909
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Regulatory agencies have sought to speed up the review of new cancer medicines and reduce delays in approval between countries. We examined trends in regulatory review times and association with clinical benefit for new cancer medicines in six jurisdictions: United States (Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), European Union (European Medicines Agency [EMA]), Switzerland (Swissmedic), Japan (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), Canada (Health Canada), and Australia (Therapeutic Goods Administration). METHODS: We studied all new cancer drugs approved in the six aforementioned jurisdictions from 2007 to 2020. We extracted all applicable expedited programs, total regulatory review times, and, for drugs first approved by the FDA, times to subsequent regulatory approval. Clinical benefit was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale value framework and ASCO-Cancer Research Committee's targets. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare total review times for high versus low clinical benefit drugs. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty eight drugs received initial approval in at least one of the six included jurisdictions. Most drugs approved by the FDA (91%) and Health Canada (59%) qualified for at least one expedited program within those jurisdictions, compared with 46% of EMA approvals and 18% of PMDA approvals. The FDA was the first regulator to approve 102 (80%) drugs. Delays in submission accounted for a median of 20.2% (EMA) to 83.8% (PMDA) of the time to subsequent approval. There was no association between high clinical benefit and shorter total review times. CONCLUSION: Most new cancer therapies were approved first by the FDA, and delays in submission of regulatory applications accounted for substantial delays in approving cancer drugs in other countries. Regulators should prioritize faster review for drugs with high clinical benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / E1532
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Economic Welfare Comparisons: Australia, the United States and the European Union
    Lombard, Marc
    ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2009, 28 (02): : 139 - 147
  • [12] Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Hey, Spencer Phillips
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 906 - 913
  • [13] Comparative public policy in Federated States, Germany, Australia, Canada, the United States and Switzerland
    Rioux, Jean-Francois F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2006, 39 (02): : 437 - 440
  • [15] DECISION-MAKING FOR MARKETING APPROVAL OF CELL AND GENE BASED THERAPY PRODUCTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, UNITED STATES AND CANADA
    Coppens, D.
    de Wilde, S.
    Guchelaar, H.
    De Bruin, M.
    Leufkens, H.
    Meij, P.
    Hoekman, J.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2017, 19 (05) : S62 - S63
  • [16] Pharmaceuticals Licensing and Reimbursement in the European Union, United States, and Japan
    Oye, K. A.
    Eichler, H. G.
    Hoos, A.
    Mori, Y.
    Mullin, T. M.
    Pearson, M.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 100 (06) : 626 - 632
  • [17] Comparing cancer drug approval systems in the United States and Japan
    Kaneda, Yudai
    Maeda, Hideki
    Ozaki, Akihiko
    Higuchi, Yuka
    Tanimoto, Tetsuya
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (05)
  • [18] Comparison of regulatory pathways for the approval of advanced therapies in the European Union and the United States
    Iglesias-Lopez, Carolina
    Obach, Merce
    Vallano, Antonio
    Agusti, Antonia
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2021, 23 (03) : 261 - 274
  • [19] Trends in Approval Times for Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States and the European Union
    Smart, Richard D.
    Blum, Matthias
    Wesseler, Justus
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (01) : 182 - 198
  • [20] Regulatory Approval Scenario of Biosimilars in Pediatric Patients in the United States and European Union
    Radhakrishna, Swetha
    Dahiya, Meghana
    Pipalava, Parag
    Jose, Vinu
    PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 93 - 112