Clinical Benefit and Expedited Approval of Cancer Drugs in the United States, European Union, Switzerland, Japan, Canada, and Australia

被引:22
|
作者
Hwang, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [3 ,4 ]
Tibau, Ariadna [5 ,6 ]
Lee, ChangWon C. [3 ,4 ]
Vokinger, Kerstin N. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Canc, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Canc Innovat & Regulat Initiat, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, 45 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law Portal, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Oncol, Inst Invest Biomed St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Law, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ESMO-MAGNITUDE; THERAPEUTICS; COST; ASCO;
D O I
10.1200/OP.21.00909
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Regulatory agencies have sought to speed up the review of new cancer medicines and reduce delays in approval between countries. We examined trends in regulatory review times and association with clinical benefit for new cancer medicines in six jurisdictions: United States (Food and Drug Administration [FDA]), European Union (European Medicines Agency [EMA]), Switzerland (Swissmedic), Japan (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency [PMDA]), Canada (Health Canada), and Australia (Therapeutic Goods Administration). METHODS: We studied all new cancer drugs approved in the six aforementioned jurisdictions from 2007 to 2020. We extracted all applicable expedited programs, total regulatory review times, and, for drugs first approved by the FDA, times to subsequent regulatory approval. Clinical benefit was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale value framework and ASCO-Cancer Research Committee's targets. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare total review times for high versus low clinical benefit drugs. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty eight drugs received initial approval in at least one of the six included jurisdictions. Most drugs approved by the FDA (91%) and Health Canada (59%) qualified for at least one expedited program within those jurisdictions, compared with 46% of EMA approvals and 18% of PMDA approvals. The FDA was the first regulator to approve 102 (80%) drugs. Delays in submission accounted for a median of 20.2% (EMA) to 83.8% (PMDA) of the time to subsequent approval. There was no association between high clinical benefit and shorter total review times. CONCLUSION: Most new cancer therapies were approved first by the FDA, and delays in submission of regulatory applications accounted for substantial delays in approving cancer drugs in other countries. Regulators should prioritize faster review for drugs with high clinical benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / E1532
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expedited Drug Review Processes for Approval in the United States and European Union with an Illustration
    Ch, Ssnd Balakrishna
    Dwarapudi, Sai Pavan
    Juturi, Ravi Kumar Reddy
    Raju, Venkateswara K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 11 (02) : 137 - 142
  • [2] Compassionate use of drugs and medical devices in the United States, the European Union and Japan
    Tsuyuki, Kenichiro
    Yano, Kazuo
    Watanabe, Natsumi
    Aruga, Atsushi
    Yamato, Masayuki
    REGENERATIVE THERAPY, 2016, 4 : 18 - 26
  • [3] Regulatory approval for autologous human cells and tissue products in the United States, the European Union, and Japan
    Yano, Kazuo
    Watanabe, Natsumi
    Tsuyuki, Kenichiro
    Ikawa, Taisuke
    Kasanuki, Hiroshi
    Yamato, Masayuki
    REGENERATIVE THERAPY, 2015, 1 : 45 - 56
  • [4] Accelerated Approval for Cancer Drugs in the United States and the Clinical Evidence Required for Conversion to Regular Approval
    Kato, Satoshi
    Ono, Shunsuke
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION, 2024, 19 (05)
  • [5] Time required for approval of new drugs in Canada, Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States in 1996-1998
    Rawson, NSB
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 162 (04) : 501 - 504
  • [6] Approval of new drugs in the United States - Comparison with the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan
    Kessler, DA
    Hass, AE
    Feiden, KL
    Lumpkin, M
    Temple, R
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (22): : 1826 - 1831
  • [7] Cancer drug approval in the United States, Europe, and Japan
    Milsted, R. A. V.
    ADVANCES IN CANCER RESEARCH, VOL 96, 2007, 96 : 371 - 391
  • [8] Timing of Pediatric Drug Approval and Clinical Evidence Submitted to Regulatory Authorities: International Comparison Among Japan, the United States, and the European Union
    Hirota, Saeko
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 108 (05) : 985 - 994
  • [9] Medical research on humans: Regulation in Switzerland, the European Union, and the United States
    Schott, M
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 2005, 60 (01) : 45 - 77
  • [10] Systematic review of brain metastases in breast cancer in the United States, European Union, and Japan
    Fenske, D. C.
    Price, G. L.
    Nyhuis, A. W.
    Hess, L. M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76