Impact noise radiated by collision of two spheres: Comparison between numerical simulations, experiments and analytical results

被引:12
|
作者
Mehraby, K. [2 ]
Beheshti, H. Khademhosseini [1 ]
Poursina, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Isfahan, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, Esfahan 8174673441, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ Majlesi, Majlesi 8631656451, Iran
关键词
Impact noise; Vibration; Collision; FEM; TRANSIENT BENDING WAVES; HOLOGRAM INTERFEROMETRY; SOUND; PLATE; TUBES;
D O I
10.1007/s12206-011-0503-z
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Impact is very common source of noise in the industries. The impacts can be visible, such as forging, and can be invisible, such as impacts due to clearance of hinges. As a result of this generality, the control of impact noise needs more attention. Reduction of this tiresome noise needs enough perception about the impact. A study of this noise sources presents difficult problems both theoretically and experimentally. This is partly due to the many complex interconnected mechanical phenomena that occur and partly due to the fact that usual steady-state techniques of analysis cannot be applied. In such complex problems numerical techniques can help to acousticians. To gain some insight into this source of sound, in this paper collision of two steel spheres are studied with finite element method (FEM). Then the FEM results were compared with experiments to show authority of this numerical method to simulate impact noises. FEM results show that if the vibrational modes are excited by impact, the vibrational modes can be as effective as rigid body motion.
引用
收藏
页码:1675 / 1685
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PULSED HEATING OF SURFACES - COMPARISON BETWEEN NUMERICAL-SIMULATION, ANALYTICAL MODELS, AND EXPERIMENTS
    PHILIPPOZ, JM
    ZENOBI, R
    ZARE, RN
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1989, 158 (1-2) : 12 - 17
  • [32] Comparison between an analytic model of nonlinear internal waves and the results of numerical experiments
    Kshevetskii, SP
    IZVESTIYA AKADEMII NAUK FIZIKA ATMOSFERY I OKEANA, 1998, 34 (03): : 317 - 326
  • [33] ISOTROPIC CHIRAL COMPOSITE MODELING - COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL, NUMERICAL, AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
    MARIOTTE, F
    TRETYAKOV, SA
    SAUVIAC, B
    MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1994, 7 (18) : 861 - 864
  • [34] Correlation between Yield Stress and Slump: Comparison between Numerical Simulations and Concrete Rheometers Results
    N. Roussel
    Materials and Structures, 2006, 39
  • [35] Correlation between yield stress and slump: Comparison between numerical simulations and concrete rheometers results
    Roussel, N.
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 39 (04) : 501 - 509
  • [36] On the Use of JMAK Theory to Describe Mechanical Amorphization: A Comparison between Experiments, Numerical Solutions and Simulations
    Blazquez, Javier S.
    Manchon-Gordon, Alejandro F.
    Ipus, Jhon J.
    Conde, Clara F.
    Conde, Alejandro
    METALS, 2018, 8 (06)
  • [37] A comparison between experiments and numerical simulations on a scale model of a Horizontal-Axis current turbine
    Lazzerini, Guido
    Coiro, Domenico P.
    Troise, Giancarlo
    D'Amato, Giuseppe
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 190 : 919 - 934
  • [38] Particle/wall electroviscous effects at the micron scale: comparison between experiments, analytical and numerical models
    Meza, J. Manuel Hernandez
    Velez-Cordero, J. Rodrigo
    Saito, A. Ramirez
    Aranda-Espinoza, S.
    Arauz-Lara, Jose L.
    Soto, Bernardo Yanez
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2022, 34 (09)
  • [39] Sound wave propagation modelling in the presence of a noise barrier: a comparison between analytical and numerical solutions
    Nkoumou, Y.
    Mertens, T.
    Bouillard, Ph.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISMA 2008: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING, VOLS. 1-8, 2008, : 4289 - 4299
  • [40] Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Heat-Assisted-Recording Media: A Comparison between Simulations and Experiments
    Meo, Andrea
    Pituso, K.
    Pornpitakpong, K.
    Suntives, A.
    Rannala, S. E.
    Chantrell, R. W.
    Chureemart, P.
    Chureemart, J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2023, 19 (05)