Comparing post-combustion CO2 capture operation at retrofitted coal-fired power plants in the Texas and Great Britain electric grids

被引:30
|
作者
Cohen, Stuart M. [1 ]
Chalmers, Hannah L. [2 ]
Webber, Michael E. [1 ]
King, Carey W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Energy Syst, Sch Engn, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Ctr Int Energy & Environm Policy, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2011年 / 6卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家环境保护局;
关键词
carbon dioxide capture; CO2; carbon capture and sequestration; electricity; coal; FLUE-GAS; PERFORMANCE; STORAGE; COST;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work analyses the carbon dioxide (CO2) capture system operation within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) and Great Britain (GB) electric grids using a previously developed first-order hourly electricity dispatch and pricing model. The grids are compared in their 2006 configuration with the addition of coal-based CO2 capture retrofits and emissions penalties from 0 to 100 US dollars per metric ton of CO2 (USD/tCO(2)). CO2 capture flexibility is investigated by comparing inflexible CO2 capture systems to flexible ones that can choose between full-and zero-load CO2 capture depending on which operating mode has lower costs or higher profits. Comparing these two grids is interesting because they have similar installed capacity and peak demand, and both are isolated electricity systems with competitive wholesale electricity markets. However, differences in capacity mix, demand patterns, and fuel markets produce diverging behaviours of CO2 capture at coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired facilities are primarily base load in ERCOT for a large range of CO2 prices but are comparably later in the dispatch order in GB and consequently often supply intermediate load. As a result, the ability to capture CO2 is more important for ensuring dispatch of coal-fired facilities in GB than in ERCOT when CO2 prices are high. In GB, higher overall coal prices mean that CO2 prices must be slightly higher than in ERCOT before the emissions savings of CO2 capture offset capture energy costs. However, once CO2 capture is economical, operating CO2 capture on half the coal fleet in each grid achieves greater emissions reductions in GB because the total coal-based capacity is 6 GW greater than in ERCOT. The market characteristics studied suggest greater opportunity for flexible CO2 capture to improve operating profits in ERCOT, but profit improvements can be offset by a flexibility cost penalty.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance and Economic Analysis of Domestic Supercritical Coal-Fired Power Plant with Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Process
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Kwak, No-Sang
    Lee, In-Young
    Jang, Kyung-Ryoung
    Shim, Jae-Goo
    [J]. KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (02): : 365 - 370
  • [42] Conventional and Advanced Exergy Analysis of Post-combustion CO2 Capture in the Context of Supercritical Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Olaleye, Akeem K.
    Wang, Meihong
    [J]. EXERGY FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND IMPROVED SUSTAINABILITY 1: FUNDAMENTALS, 2018, : 1235 - 1248
  • [43] China baseline coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture: 2. Techno-economics
    Singh, Surinder
    Lu, Haoren
    Cui, Qian
    Li, Chufu
    Zhao, Xinglei
    Xu, Wenqiang
    Ku, Anthony Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 78 : 429 - 436
  • [44] Integration of post-combustion capture and storage into a pulverized coal-fired power plant
    Sanpasertparnich, Teerawat
    Idem, Raphael
    Bolea, Irene
    deMontigny, David
    Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2010, 4 (03) : 499 - 510
  • [45] Optimal design for double reheat coal-fired power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture: A novel thermal system integration with a carbon capture turbine
    Fu, Wenfeng
    Wang, Lanjing
    Yang, Yongping
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 221
  • [46] Model Predictive Control for Integrated Operation of Coal-Fired Power Plant and Post-Combustion Carbon Capture
    Zhou, Chunlei
    Li, Dou
    Zhang, Youwei
    Liao, Peizhi
    Cao, Shuoshuo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2019, : 2852 - 2856
  • [47] Modeling and simulation of the start-up process of coal fired power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture
    Marx-Schubach, Thomas
    Schmitz, Gerhard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2019, 87 : 44 - 57
  • [48] Partial O2-fired coal power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture: A retrofitting option for CO2 capture ready plants
    Doukelis, A.
    Vorrias, I.
    Grammelis, P.
    Kakaras, E.
    Whitehouse, M.
    Riley, G.
    [J]. FUEL, 2009, 88 (12) : 2428 - 2436
  • [49] A novel flue gas pre-treatment system of post-combustion CO2 capture in coal-fired power plant
    Yan, Min
    Li, Yuzhong
    Chen, Guifang
    Zhang, Liqiang
    Mao, Yanpeng
    Ma, Chunyuan
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 128 : 331 - 341
  • [50] Upgrading the integration of supercritical coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture process through process simulation
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Yu, Yanmei
    Chen, Jian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2017, 12 (02) : 149 - 163