Development of a more accurate Geant4 quantum molecular dynamics model for hadron therapy

被引:5
|
作者
Sato, Yoshi-hide [1 ]
Sakata, Dousatsu [2 ,3 ]
Bolst, David [4 ]
Simpson, Edward C. [5 ]
Guatelli, Susanna [4 ]
Haga, Akihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Tokushima 7708503, Japan
[2] Inst Quantum Med Sci, Dept Accelerator & Med Phys, QST, Chiba 2638555, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Hlth Sci, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[4] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med & Radiat Phys, Wollongong 2522, Australia
[5] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Phys, Dept Nucl Phys & Accelerator Applicat, CanberraACT 2601, Canberra, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2022年 / 67卷 / 22期
关键词
hadron therapy; fragmentation; quantum molecular dynamics; multi-objective optimization; CARBON-ION RADIOTHERAPY; GROUND-STATE PROPERTIES; NUCLEAR FRAGMENTATION; VALIDATION; BEAMS; PARAMETRIZATION; PROTON;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a9a
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Although in heavy-ion therapy, the quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) model is one of the most fundamental physics models providing an accurate daughter-ion production yield in the final state, there are still non-negligible differences with the experimental results. The aim of this study is to improve fragment production in water phantoms by developing a more accurate QMD model in Geant4. Approach. A QMD model was developed by implementing modern Skyrme interaction parameter sets, as well as by incorporating with an ad hoc alpha-cluster model in the initial nuclear state. Two adjusting parameters were selected that can significantly affect the fragment productions in the QMD model: the radius to discriminate a cluster to which nucleons belong after the nucleus-nucleus reaction, denoted by R, and the squared standard deviation of the Gaussian packet, denoted by L. Squared Mahalanobis's distance of fragment yields and angular distributions with 1, 2, and the higher atomic number for the produced fragments were employed as objective functions, and multi-objective optimization (MOO), which make it possible to compare quantitatively the simulated production yields with the reference experimental data, was performed. Main results. The MOO analysis showed that the QMD model with modern Skyrme parameters coupled with the proposed alpha-cluster model, denoted as SkM* alpha, can drastically improve light fragments yields in water. In addition, the proposed model reproduced the kinetic energy distribution of the fragments accurately. The optimized L in SkM* alpha was confirmed to be realistic by the charge radii analysis in the ground state formation. Significance. The proposed framework using MOO was demonstrated to be very useful in judging the superiority of the proposed nuclear model. The optimized QMD model is expected to improve the accuracy of heavy-ion therapy dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A data-based photonuclear reaction model for GEANT4
    Shin, Jae Won
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2015, 358 : 194 - 200
  • [42] Geant4 beam model for boron neutron capture therapy: investigation of neutron dose components
    Leyla Moghaddasi
    Eva Bezak
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2018, 41 : 129 - 141
  • [43] Benchmarking nuclear models of FLUKA and GEANT4 for carbon ion therapy
    Bohlen, T. T.
    Cerutti, F.
    Dosanjh, M.
    Ferrari, A.
    Gudowska, I.
    Mairani, A.
    Quesada, J. M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (19): : 5833 - 5847
  • [44] Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model
    Bleicher, M
    Zabrodin, E
    Spieles, C
    Bass, SA
    Ernst, C
    Soff, S
    Bravina, L
    Belkacem, M
    Weber, H
    Stöcker, H
    Greiner, W
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS G-NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 1999, 25 (09) : 1859 - 1896
  • [45] Modeling Considerations for Improving Accuracy of a Proton Therapy Beam with GEANT4
    Barnes, Samuel R. S.
    McAuley, Grant A.
    Slater, James M.
    Wroe, Andrew J.
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 2107 - 2112
  • [46] Application of a GEANT4 Simulation to a 60Co Therapy Unit
    Shin, Jae Won
    Hong, Seung-Woo
    Lee, Cung-Il
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [47] Geant4 applications for modeling molecular transport in complex vacuum geometries
    Singal, Jack
    Langton, J. Brian
    Schindler, Rafe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODELING SIMULATION AND SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2014, 5 (02)
  • [48] Development of the Monte Carlo Simulation Platform Using Geant4 for Designing Particle Therapy Beam Nozzle
    Shin, J.
    Chun, J.
    Lee, H.
    Kim, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E264 - E265
  • [49] Nuclear Resonance Fluorescence (NRF) In GEANT4: Development, Validation, and Testing
    Lakshmanan, Manu N.
    Harrawood, Brian P.
    Agasthya, Greeshma A.
    Rusev, Gencho
    Kapadia, Anuj J.
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 1731 - 1734
  • [50] Validation of GEANT4 Monte Carlo models with a highly granular scintillator-steel hadron calorimeter
    Adloff, C.
    Blaha, J.
    Blaising, J. -J.
    Drancourt, C.
    Espargiliere, A.
    Gaglione, R.
    Geffroy, N.
    Karyotakis, Y.
    Prast, J.
    Vouters, G.
    Francis, K.
    Repond, J.
    Schlereth, J.
    Smith, J.
    Xia, L.
    Baldolemar, E.
    Li, J.
    Park, S. T.
    Sosebee, M.
    White, A. P.
    Yu, J.
    Buanes, T.
    Eigen, G.
    Mikami, Y.
    Watson, N. K.
    Mavromanolakis, G.
    Thomson, M. A.
    Ward, D. R.
    Yan, W.
    Benchekroun, D.
    Hoummada, A.
    Khoulaki, Y.
    Apostolakis, J.
    Dotti, A.
    Folger, G.
    Ivantchenko, V.
    Uzhinskiy, V.
    Benyamna, M.
    Carloganu, C.
    Fehr, F.
    Gay, P.
    Manen, S.
    Royer, L.
    Blazey, G. C.
    Dyshkant, A.
    Lima, J. G. R.
    Zutshi, V.
    Hostachy, J. -Y.
    Morin, L.
    Cornett, U.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2013, 8