Dosimetric impact of tantalum markers used in the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton beam therapy

被引:57
|
作者
Newhauser, Wayne D.
Koch, Nicholas C.
Fontenot, Jonas D.
Rosenthal, Stanley J.
Gombos, Dan S.
Fitzek, Markus M.
Mohan, Radhe
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Unit 94, Dept Head & Neck Surg,Sect Ophthalmol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Midwest Proton Radiotherapy Inst, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2007年 / 52卷 / 13期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/021
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Metallic fiducial markers are frequently implanted in patients prior to external-beam radiation therapy to facilitate tumor localization. There is little information in the literature, however, about the perturbations in proton absorbed-dose distribution these objects cause. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric impact of perturbations caused by 2.5 mm diameter by 0.2 mm thick tantalum fiducial markers when used in proton therapy for treating uveal melanoma. Absorbed dose perturbations were measured using radiochromic film and confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations of the experiment. Additional Monte Carlo simulations were performed to study the effects of range modulation and fiducial placement location on the magnitude of the dose shadow for a representative uveal melanoma treatment. The simulations revealed that the fiducials caused perturbations in the absorbed-dose distribution, including absorbed-dose shadows of 22% to 82% in a typical proton beam for treating uveal melanoma, depending on the marker depth and orientation. The clinical implication of this study is that implanted fiducials may, in certain circumstances, cause dose shadows that could lower the tumor dose and theoretically compromise local tumor control. To avoid this situation, fiducials should be positioned laterally or distally with respect to the target volume.
引用
收藏
页码:3979 / 3990
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When is the Optimum Radiological Response to Proton Beam Therapy in Uveal Melanoma?
    Gillam, Matthew
    Fenech, Glenn
    Chadwick, Oliver
    Nairn, Jonathan
    Chadha, Vikas
    Connolly, Julie
    Cram, Oliver
    Kincaid, Wilma
    Cauchi, Paul
    OCULAR ONCOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY, 2023, 9 (5-6) : 130 - 137
  • [23] Cataract development in patients treated with proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma
    Ira Seibel
    Dino Cordini
    Annette Hager
    Aline I. Riechardt
    Matus Rehak
    Alexander Böker
    Dirk Böhmer
    Jens Heufelder
    Antonia M. Joussen
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2016, 254 : 1625 - 1630
  • [24] POSTERIOR UVEAL MELANOMA IN YOUNG PATIENTS TREATED WITH PROTON BEAM THERAPY
    Vavvas, Demetrios
    Kim, Ivana
    Lane, Anne Marie
    Chaglassian, Alan
    Mukai, Shizuo
    Gragoudas, Evangelos
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2010, 30 (08): : 1267 - 1271
  • [25] Cataract development in patients treated with proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma
    Seibel, Ira
    Cordini, Dino
    Hager, Annette
    Riechardt, Aline I.
    Rehak, Matus
    Boeker, Alexander
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Heufelder, Jens
    Joussen, Antonia M.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 254 (08) : 1625 - 1630
  • [26] Proton beam therapy in uveal melanoma patients from the Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Studygroup
    van Poppelen, N. M.
    Wu, M.
    Yavuzyigitoglu, S.
    Bakker, P. A. C.
    Kroesen, M.
    van Rij, C.
    Slagter, C.
    Naus, N. C.
    Kilic, E.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2023, 101 : 37 - 37
  • [27] Tantalum marker number in the treatment of uveal melanoma
    Poothullil, AM
    Hayes, DJC
    Daftari, IK
    O'Brien, JM
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U251 - U251
  • [28] Impact of Adjuvant Ocular Interventions on the Quality of Life of Patients with Uveal Melanoma after Proton Beam Therapy
    Gollrad, Johannes
    Rabsahl, Christopher
    Joussen, Antonia M.
    Stroux, Andrea
    Budach, Volker
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Boeker, Alexander
    OCULAR ONCOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY, 2022, 8 (02) : 110 - 119
  • [29] Technical note: Impact of beam properties for uveal melanoma proton therapy-An in silico planning study
    Wulff, Joerg
    Koska, Benjamin
    Janson, Martin
    Baeumer, Christian
    Denker, Andrea
    Geismar, Dirk
    Gollrad, Johannes
    Timmermann, Beate
    Heufelder, Jens
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (05) : 3481 - 3488
  • [30] Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning
    Jonathan E. Lu
    R. Joel Welch
    Kavita K. Mishra
    Inder K. Daftari
    Susanna S. Park
    Eye, 2019, 33 : 1904 - 1910