Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens

被引:125
|
作者
Alio, Jorge L. [1 ,2 ]
Pinero, David P. [3 ]
Plaza-Puche, Ana B.
Joanna Rodriguez, Maria
机构
[1] Vissum Corp, Inst Oftalmol Alicante, Res Dev & Innovat, Alicante, Spain
[2] Univ Miguel Hernandez, Div Ophthalmol, Alicante, Spain
[3] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
来源
关键词
HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; WAVE-FRONT ANALYSIS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CATARACT-SURGERY; RETINAL STRAYLIGHT; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPLANTATION; RESTOR; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity outcomes and ocular and intraocular optical quality in patients with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) or a multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry. SETTING: Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Consecutive eyes of cataract patients were divided into 2 groups. One group received a Lentis Mplus LS-312 multifocal IOL and the other, an Acri.Smart 48S monofocal IOL. Distance and near visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, intraocular aberrations (global minus corneal aberrations), and defocus curves were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively during a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: The study evaluated 52 eyes of 29 patients (age range 36 to 87 years); 24 eyes were in multifocal IOL group and 28 eyes, in the monofocal IOL group. Both groups had a significant improvement in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities and in distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) postoperatively (P <=.04). The multifocal IOL group had significantly better uncorrected near acuity and DCNVA (Jaeger [J] 5 versus J2) (both P<.01). The defocus curves showed significantly better visual acuities in the multifocal group at several levels of defocus. The multifocal group had significantly higher amounts of postoperative intraocular primary coma (P<.01), especially in eyes with significant IOL tilt, although there were no significant differences in contrast sensitivity between the 2 IOL groups (P >=.25). CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation multifocal IOL restored distance, intermediate, and near visual function after cataract surgery. The optical quality with this type of IOL was particularly affected by IOL lilt and decentration.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 250
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with monofocal intraocular lens in the contralateral eye
    Kim, Jae Yong
    Lee, Yunhan
    Won, Hun Jae
    Jeong, Hyerin
    Park, Jin Hyoung
    Kim, Myoung Joon
    Tchah, Hungwon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 13 (05) : 737 - 743
  • [12] Comparison of Visual Neuroadaptations After Multifocal and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation
    Zhang, Li
    Lin, Duoru
    Wang, Yong
    Chen, Wan
    Xiao, Wei
    Xiang, Yi
    Zhu, Yi
    Chen, Chuan
    Dong, Xiying
    Liu, Yizhi
    Chen, Weirong
    Lin, Haotian
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [13] Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens
    Wang, Xiao
    Tu, Haixia
    Wang, Yong
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [14] Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction After Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation and During Multifocal Contact Lens Wear After Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation: A Pilot Study
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Iijima, Kei
    Hiraoka, Takahiro
    Takada, Keita
    Mori, Yosai
    Miyata, Kazunori
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (04) : 1119 - 1128
  • [15] Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction After Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation and During Multifocal Contact Lens Wear After Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation: A Pilot Study
    Kazutaka Kamiya
    Kei Iijima
    Takahiro Hiraoka
    Keita Takada
    Yosai Mori
    Kazunori Miyata
    Ophthalmology and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 1119 - 1128
  • [16] Near Visual Performance Results of the Accommodating Intraocular Lens (Tetraflex)® in Comparison to Monofocal Foldable Intraocular Lens
    Rahimi, Firoozeh
    Ghahari, Elham
    Hashemian, Mohammad Naser
    Fallah, Mohammad Reza
    Siatiri, Heidar
    Rajabi, Mohammad Taher
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 21 (03): : 5 - 10
  • [17] Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a new multifocal intraocular lens vs a trifocal intraocular lens
    Dick, H. Burkhard
    Ang, Robert E.
    Corbett, Dean
    Hoffmann, Peter
    Tetz, Manfred
    Villarrubia, Alberto
    Palomino, Carlos
    Castillo-Gomez, Alfredo
    Tsai, Linda
    Thomas, Eugenia K.
    Janakiraman, Priya
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (11): : 1270 - 1276
  • [18] Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens
    Lee, Shinwook
    Choi, Myoung
    Xu, Zaiwei
    Zhao, Zeyu
    Alexander, Elsinore
    Liu, Yueai
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 1031 - 1038
  • [19] Pupil Influence on the Visual Outcomes of a New-Generation Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens With a Surface-Embedded Near Segment
    Wang, Mengmeng
    Corpuz, Christine Carole C.
    Huseynova, Tukezban
    Tomita, Minoru
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (02) : 90 - +
  • [20] Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens
    Modi, Satish
    Lehmann, Robert
    Maxwell, Andrew
    Solomon, Kerry
    Cionni, Robert
    Thompson, Vance
    Horn, Jeffrey
    Caplan, Michael
    Fisher, Bret
    Hu, Jerry G.
    Yeu, Elizabeth
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (02) : 197 - 207