Historical Lifetimes of Drugs in England: Application to Value of Information and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

被引:14
|
作者
Hoyle, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, PenTAG, Peninsular Coll Med & Dent, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; decision modeling; ICER; technology assessment; time horizon; value of information analysis; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; EXPECTED VALUE; HEALTH-CARE; HALF-LIFE; TECHNOLOGY; BENEFITS; TRUTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00778.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The expected lifetime of a health technology is a critical parameter in value of information analysis and in two methodologies for cost-effectiveness analysis which have recently been suggested. The first method allows for the possibility that a superior technology will become available in the future. The second advocates modeling both the prevalent and all future incident patient cohorts. Unfortunately, for value of information analysis, the period of time over which information about the decision problem would be useful is very uncertain, and existing estimates are seemingly arbitrary. Furthermore, there is very little literature on the historical lifetimes of technologies. Here, I quantify and analyze the historical lifetimes of drugs in England. I then apply this information to inform the value of further research and the cost-effectiveness of health technologies. Methods: A Weibull regression model was fitted to the historical drug lifetimes of 455 drugs. These represented all British National Formulary drugs in England which were launched from 1981 to 2007, and which did not have very low sales volumes. Results: The mean drug lifetime was 57 years (95% confidence interval 39-79 years), and the median was 46 years (35-60 years). Drugs with low sales volumes tended to have shorter lifetimes. Under certain assumptions, the ratio of population level to per-year expected value of information is 21. Drug lifetimes are used to parameterize the two models of cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: The distribution function of the historical lifetimes of drugs can inform suitable time horizons for: 1) value of information; and 2) cost-effectiveness analyses related to drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 892
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of Productivity Loss/Gain in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Drugs: A Systematic Review
    Yuasa, Akira
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    LoPresti, Michael
    Ikeda, Shunya
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (01) : 81 - 97
  • [42] DRUG INFORMATION AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS
    MAYNARD, A
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 2 (6189): : 546 - 547
  • [43] THE JOURNALS POLICY ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES
    KASSIRER, JP
    ANGELL, M
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (10): : 669 - 670
  • [44] Statistical methods for cost-effectiveness analyses
    Siegel, C
    Laska, E
    Meisner, M
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (05): : 387 - 406
  • [45] Promoting confidence in cost-effectiveness analyses
    Raymakers, Adam J. N.
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 377
  • [46] The Challenges of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for the Clinician
    Erickson, Kevin F.
    Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2010, 56 (06) : 1023 - 1025
  • [47] Appraising decision and cost-effectiveness analyses
    Hunink, MGM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (07) : 783 - 787
  • [48] THE GROWTH OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES IN ASIA
    Neumann, P. J.
    D'Cruz, B. N.
    Emerson, J. G.
    Panzer, A. D.
    Anderson, J. E.
    Pope, E.
    Kim, D. D.
    Cohen, J. T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S56 - S56
  • [49] Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses
    Siegel, JE
    Weinstein, MC
    Russell, LB
    Gold, MR
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (16): : 1339 - 1341
  • [50] In Brief: Cost-effectiveness Analyses in Orthopaedics
    Vavken, Patrick
    Bianchi, Thomas
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (08) : 2395 - 2398