Historical Lifetimes of Drugs in England: Application to Value of Information and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

被引:14
|
作者
Hoyle, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, PenTAG, Peninsular Coll Med & Dent, Exeter EX2 4SG, Devon, England
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; decision modeling; ICER; technology assessment; time horizon; value of information analysis; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; EXPECTED VALUE; HEALTH-CARE; HALF-LIFE; TECHNOLOGY; BENEFITS; TRUTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00778.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The expected lifetime of a health technology is a critical parameter in value of information analysis and in two methodologies for cost-effectiveness analysis which have recently been suggested. The first method allows for the possibility that a superior technology will become available in the future. The second advocates modeling both the prevalent and all future incident patient cohorts. Unfortunately, for value of information analysis, the period of time over which information about the decision problem would be useful is very uncertain, and existing estimates are seemingly arbitrary. Furthermore, there is very little literature on the historical lifetimes of technologies. Here, I quantify and analyze the historical lifetimes of drugs in England. I then apply this information to inform the value of further research and the cost-effectiveness of health technologies. Methods: A Weibull regression model was fitted to the historical drug lifetimes of 455 drugs. These represented all British National Formulary drugs in England which were launched from 1981 to 2007, and which did not have very low sales volumes. Results: The mean drug lifetime was 57 years (95% confidence interval 39-79 years), and the median was 46 years (35-60 years). Drugs with low sales volumes tended to have shorter lifetimes. Under certain assumptions, the ratio of population level to per-year expected value of information is 21. Drug lifetimes are used to parameterize the two models of cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: The distribution function of the historical lifetimes of drugs can inform suitable time horizons for: 1) value of information; and 2) cost-effectiveness analyses related to drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 892
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How should we assess the value of innovative drugs in oncology? Lessons from cost-effectiveness analyses
    Prasad, Vinay
    Mailankody, Sham
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (15) : 1860 - 1861
  • [22] USE OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS AFFORDABILITY CURVES IN EVALUATING CANCER DRUGS IN ENGLAND
    Yi, Y.
    Lucherini, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S462 - S462
  • [23] OPTIMAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES
    NIGHTINGALE, SD
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 7 (03) : 369 - 370
  • [24] Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses
    Douglas K. Owens
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998, 13 : 716 - 717
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analyses - Reply
    Prosser, LA
    Stinnett, AA
    Goldman, L
    Weinstein, MC
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (05) : 382 - 383
  • [26] A REVIEW OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES
    HURLEY, S
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1990, 153 : S20 - S23
  • [27] Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses
    Owens, DK
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 13 (10) : 716 - 717
  • [28] Group cognitive behavioural therapy for postnatal depression: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses
    Stevenson, M. D.
    Scope, A.
    Sutcliffe, P. A.
    Booth, A.
    Slade, P.
    Parry, G.
    Saxon, D.
    Kalthenthaler, E.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 14 (44) : IX - +
  • [29] Standardizing cost-effectiveness analyses: The panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine
    Gold, MR
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 : S351 - S354
  • [30] Accounting for Heterogeneity in Relative Treatment Effects for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models and Value-of-Information Analyses
    Welton, Nicky J.
    Soares, Marta O.
    Palmer, Stephen
    Ades, Anthony E.
    Harrison, David
    Shankar-Hari, Manu
    Rowan, Kathy M.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (05) : 608 - 621