Mobile Cardiac Acoustic Monitoring System to Evaluate Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Pacemaker Patients

被引:4
|
作者
Huang, Jingjuan [1 ]
Zhang, Weiwei [1 ]
Pan, Changqing [1 ]
Zhu, Shiwei [1 ]
Mead, Robert Hardwin [2 ]
Li, Ruogu [1 ]
He, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Silicon Valley Cardiol, East Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
mobile monitoring; acoustic cardiography; electromechanical activation time (EMAT); left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD); left bundle branch pacing (LBBP); HEART-FAILURE; CARDIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11133862
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system is a promising tool to enable detection and assist the diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of electromechanical activation time (EMAT), an important cardiac acoustic biomarker, in quantifying LVSD among left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) patients using a mobile acoustic cardiography monitoring system. In this prospective single-center observational study, pacemaker-dependent patients were consecutively enrolled. EMAT, the time from the start of the pacing QRS wave to first heart sound (S1) peak; left ventricular systolic time (LVST), the time from S1 peak to S2 peak; and ECG were recorded simultaneously by the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system. LVEF was measured by echocardiography. A logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the association between EMAT and reduced EF (LVEF < 50%). A total of 105 pacemaker-dependent patients participated. The RVAP group (n = 58) displayed a significantly higher EMAT than the LBBP group (n = 47) (150.95 +/- 19.46 vs. 108.23 +/- 12.26 ms, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between EMAT and LVEF (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed the sensitivity and specificity of detecting LVEF to be < 50% when EMAT >= 151 ms were 96.00% and 96.97% in the RVAP group. In LBBP patients, the sensitivity and specificity of using EMAT >= 110 ms as the cutoff value for the detection of LVEF < 50% were 75.00% and 100.00%. There was no significant difference in LVST with or without LVSD in the RVAP group (p = 0.823) and LBBP group (p = 0.086). Compared to LVST, EMAT was more helpful to identify LVSD in pacemaker-dependent patients. The cutoff point of EMAT for diagnosing LVEF < 50% differed regarding the pacing type. Therefore, the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system can be used to identify the progress of LVSD in pacemaker patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiac function index by transpulmonary thermodilution and left ventricular systolic function Reply
    Monnet, Xavier
    Jabot, Julien
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) : 1226 - 1226
  • [22] LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION AND SYSTOLIC ASYNCHRONY IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK AND NORMAL LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION
    Weng, Li
    Liu, Yongtai
    Zhou, Jianfang
    Guo, Xiaoxiao
    Peng, Jinmin
    Hu, Xiaoyun
    Fang, Quan
    Zhu, Wenling
    Li, Huijuan
    Du, Bin
    Zhang, Shuyang
    SHOCK, 2013, 40 (03): : 175 - 181
  • [23] Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
    Whellan, DJ
    Shaw, LK
    Bart, BA
    Kraus, WE
    Califf, RM
    O'Connor, CM
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 142 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [24] Sudden cardiac death in patients with stable coronary disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function
    Hsia, Judith
    Jablonski, Kathleen A.
    Rice, Madeline M.
    Sabatine, Marc S.
    Maggioni, Aldo P.
    Cuddy, Thomas E.
    Domanski, Michael J.
    Geller, Nancy L.
    Flaker, Greg
    Solomon, Scott
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Rouleau, Jean L.
    Braunwald, Eugene
    Pfeffer, Marc A.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 640 - 640
  • [25] Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function - Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis
    Stamenkovic, BN
    Stankovic, AM
    Lovic, BK
    Ilic, MZD
    Ilic, SN
    Dordevic, DB
    Bojanovic, AL
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 28 : 58 - 58
  • [26] Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy
    Bondar, I. A.
    Shabelnikova, O. Y.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2009, 52 : S472 - S472
  • [27] Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest with Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function
    Reinier, Kyndaron
    Uy-Evanado, Audrey
    Teodorescu, Carmen
    Chugh, Harpriya
    Mariani, Ronald
    Gunson, Karen
    Jui, Jonathan
    Chugh, Sumeet S.
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [28] Biomarker profile of patients with recovery of left ventricular systolic function following acute cardiac decompensation
    Albert, J.
    Morbach, C.
    Brenner, S.
    Stoerk, S.
    Ertl, G.
    Angermann, C. E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 1036 - 1037
  • [29] Cardiac Imaging to Assess Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Atrial Fibrillation
    Bunting, Karina, V
    O'Connor, Kieran
    Steeds, Richard P.
    Kotecha, Dipak
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 139 : 40 - 49
  • [30] Assessment of left ventricular systolic synchrony and cardiac function in patients with ischemic heart disease by echocardiography
    Qu, H-P
    Dong, P-S
    Song, Y-J
    Wang, H-M
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (08) : 2380 - 2384