Mobile Cardiac Acoustic Monitoring System to Evaluate Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Pacemaker Patients

被引:4
|
作者
Huang, Jingjuan [1 ]
Zhang, Weiwei [1 ]
Pan, Changqing [1 ]
Zhu, Shiwei [1 ]
Mead, Robert Hardwin [2 ]
Li, Ruogu [1 ]
He, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Silicon Valley Cardiol, East Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
mobile monitoring; acoustic cardiography; electromechanical activation time (EMAT); left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD); left bundle branch pacing (LBBP); HEART-FAILURE; CARDIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11133862
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system is a promising tool to enable detection and assist the diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of electromechanical activation time (EMAT), an important cardiac acoustic biomarker, in quantifying LVSD among left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) patients using a mobile acoustic cardiography monitoring system. In this prospective single-center observational study, pacemaker-dependent patients were consecutively enrolled. EMAT, the time from the start of the pacing QRS wave to first heart sound (S1) peak; left ventricular systolic time (LVST), the time from S1 peak to S2 peak; and ECG were recorded simultaneously by the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system. LVEF was measured by echocardiography. A logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the association between EMAT and reduced EF (LVEF < 50%). A total of 105 pacemaker-dependent patients participated. The RVAP group (n = 58) displayed a significantly higher EMAT than the LBBP group (n = 47) (150.95 +/- 19.46 vs. 108.23 +/- 12.26 ms, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between EMAT and LVEF (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed the sensitivity and specificity of detecting LVEF to be < 50% when EMAT >= 151 ms were 96.00% and 96.97% in the RVAP group. In LBBP patients, the sensitivity and specificity of using EMAT >= 110 ms as the cutoff value for the detection of LVEF < 50% were 75.00% and 100.00%. There was no significant difference in LVST with or without LVSD in the RVAP group (p = 0.823) and LBBP group (p = 0.086). Compared to LVST, EMAT was more helpful to identify LVSD in pacemaker-dependent patients. The cutoff point of EMAT for diagnosing LVEF < 50% differed regarding the pacing type. Therefore, the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system can be used to identify the progress of LVSD in pacemaker patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Cardiac Imaging to Evaluate Left Ventricular Diastolic Function
    Flachskampf, Frank A.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 8 (09) : 1072 - 1093
  • [12] SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC INTRAVENTRICULAR ASYNCHRONY OF THE LEFT VENTRICULAR MYOCARDIUM IN PATIENTS WITH PACEMAKER
    Atkov, O. Yu.
    Popova, E. Yu.
    Gorokhova, S. G.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2012, 84 (01): : 36 - 40
  • [13] Cardiac resynchronization therapy: an updateimpaired left ventricular systolic function
    Garikipati, N. V.
    Schaefer, M. J.
    Steinberg, J. S.
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2011, 59 (01): : 89 - 100
  • [14] Associations among left ventricular systolic function, tachycardia, and cardiac preload in septic patients
    Michael J. Lanspa
    Sajid Shahul
    Andrew Hersh
    Emily L. Wilson
    Troy D. Olsen
    Eliotte L. Hirshberg
    Colin K. Grissom
    Samuel M. Brown
    Annals of Intensive Care, 7
  • [15] Sudden cardiac arrest in patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function: A clinical dilemma
    Sawhiney, Navinder
    Narayan, Sanjiv M.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2009, 6 (03) : S15 - S21
  • [16] Associations among left ventricular systolic function, tachycardia, and cardiac preload in septic patients
    Lanspa, Michael J.
    Shahul, Sajid
    Hersh, Andrew
    Wilson, Emily L.
    Olsen, Troy D.
    Hirshberg, Eliotte L.
    Grissom, Colin K.
    Brown, Samuel M.
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2017, 7
  • [17] Left ventricular systolic function monitoring in asymptomatic dialysis patients: A prospective cohort study
    Zoccali, Carmine
    Benedetto, Francesco A.
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Mallamaci, Francesca
    Rapisarda, Francesco
    Seminara, Giuseppe
    Bonanno, Graziella
    Malatino, Lorenzo S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 17 (05): : 1460 - 1465
  • [18] Determinants of Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function
    Yamada, Keiji
    Sakuragi, Satoru
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2013, 19 (10) : S143 - S143
  • [19] Renal function in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction
    Matskevich, S. A.
    Barbuk, O. A.
    Atroschenko, E. S.
    Belskaya, M. I.
    Semenova, N. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2014, 16 : 40 - 40
  • [20] Who are the patients that improved cardiac function in acute heart failure with reduced left ventricular systolic function?
    Kim, S-Y Song-Yi
    Choi, J. H.
    Kim, K-S
    Joo, S. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2015, 17 : 430 - 431