Mobile Cardiac Acoustic Monitoring System to Evaluate Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Pacemaker Patients

被引:4
|
作者
Huang, Jingjuan [1 ]
Zhang, Weiwei [1 ]
Pan, Changqing [1 ]
Zhu, Shiwei [1 ]
Mead, Robert Hardwin [2 ]
Li, Ruogu [1 ]
He, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Silicon Valley Cardiol, East Palo Alto, CA 94303 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
mobile monitoring; acoustic cardiography; electromechanical activation time (EMAT); left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD); left bundle branch pacing (LBBP); HEART-FAILURE; CARDIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11133862
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system is a promising tool to enable detection and assist the diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of electromechanical activation time (EMAT), an important cardiac acoustic biomarker, in quantifying LVSD among left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) patients using a mobile acoustic cardiography monitoring system. In this prospective single-center observational study, pacemaker-dependent patients were consecutively enrolled. EMAT, the time from the start of the pacing QRS wave to first heart sound (S1) peak; left ventricular systolic time (LVST), the time from S1 peak to S2 peak; and ECG were recorded simultaneously by the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system. LVEF was measured by echocardiography. A logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the association between EMAT and reduced EF (LVEF < 50%). A total of 105 pacemaker-dependent patients participated. The RVAP group (n = 58) displayed a significantly higher EMAT than the LBBP group (n = 47) (150.95 +/- 19.46 vs. 108.23 +/- 12.26 ms, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between EMAT and LVEF (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed the sensitivity and specificity of detecting LVEF to be < 50% when EMAT >= 151 ms were 96.00% and 96.97% in the RVAP group. In LBBP patients, the sensitivity and specificity of using EMAT >= 110 ms as the cutoff value for the detection of LVEF < 50% were 75.00% and 100.00%. There was no significant difference in LVST with or without LVSD in the RVAP group (p = 0.823) and LBBP group (p = 0.086). Compared to LVST, EMAT was more helpful to identify LVSD in pacemaker-dependent patients. The cutoff point of EMAT for diagnosing LVEF < 50% differed regarding the pacing type. Therefore, the mobile cardiac acoustic monitoring system can be used to identify the progress of LVSD in pacemaker patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LEFT VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC FUNCTION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH DEFINITIVE PACEMAKER
    Cabrera Ortega, M.
    Gonzales Morejon, A. Eladio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S132 - S132
  • [2] Left ventricular systolic function in patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis
    Perlini, S.
    Vezzoli, M.
    Clari, F.
    Palladini, G.
    Russo, P.
    Nuvolone, M.
    Merlini, G.
    XIth International Symposium on Amyloidosis, 2008, : 283 - 285
  • [3] Left ventricular systolic function in patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis
    Perlini, S.
    Vezzoli, S.
    Clari, F.
    Palladini, G.
    Russo, P.
    Nuvolone, M.
    Merlini, G.
    AMYLOID-JOURNAL OF PROTEIN FOLDING DISORDERS, 2006, 13 : 52 - 53
  • [4] Left ventricular only pacing with dual chamber pacemaker system: Improve left ventricular function in patients with atrioventricular conduction delay and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
    Habiba, Umme Habiba Ferdaushi
    Atahar, M. Atahar Ali
    Shaila, Shaila Nabi
    Mainul, Mainul Islam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 : 403 - 403
  • [5] LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTOLIC MURMURS AND CARDIAC DISEASE
    KNIGHT, PV
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 1990, 12 (1-2): : 43 - 49
  • [6] Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by the cardiac function index
    Combes, A
    Berncau, P
    Luyt, C
    Trouillet, J
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 : S167 - S167
  • [7] Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography for Left Ventricular Systolic Function
    Prada, Gabriel
    Fritz, Ashley V.
    Restrepo-Holguin, Mariana
    Guru, Pramod K.
    Diaz-Gomez, Jose L.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (21): : E36 - +
  • [8] Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography for Left Ventricular Systolic Function
    Zhou, Haiyan
    Zou, Xiaohua
    Hu, Bailong
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10): : 977 - 977
  • [9] Noninvasive detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction by acoustic cardiography in cardiac failure patients
    Roos, Markus
    Toggweiler, Stefan
    Jamshidi, Peiman
    Zuber, Michel
    Kobza, Richard
    Meier, Rolf
    Erne, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2008, 14 (04) : 310 - 319
  • [10] Impaired left ventricular systolic function in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy
    Wachtell, Kristian
    Olsen, Michael Hecht
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 29 (11) : 2068 - 2069