What Is the Relevance of Contact Allergy to Sodium Metabisulfite and Which Concentration of the Allergen Should We Use?

被引:17
|
作者
Ralph, Nicola [1 ]
Verma, Saroj [1 ]
Merry, Subha [1 ]
Lally, Aoife [1 ]
Kirby, Brian [1 ]
Collins, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Charles Ctr, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
DERMATITIS; SULFITE;
D O I
10.1097/DER.0000000000000120
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background The prevalence of contact allergy to sodium metabisulfite (SMB) has increased from the range of 1.4% to 1.7% to the range of 3.4% to 6.8% in published series over the past 20 years. Aims The aims of this study were to review contact allergy to SMB in our cohort and to investigate different concentrations to define the most appropriate concentration for patch testing. Methods Patient records were reviewed between February 2009 and December 2011 to obtain information on patient demographics, clinical presentation, and prevalence of contact allergy to SMB. Patients attending for patch testing, between January 2012 and June 2013, were tested with 3 strengths of SMB as part of the British standard series (1%, 0.1%, and 0.01%). Results Nine hundred ninety-six patients were patch tested to the British standard series including SMB 1% in petrolatum between February 2009 and June 2013, and 70 (7%) were positive. In the prospective group, 380 were tested to 3 concentrations of SMB (1.0%, 0.1%, and 0.01%). Fourteen patients (3.68%) had a positive patch test with 1% SMB, 7 to 0.1% SMB, and 3 to 0.01% SMB. There was exposure to SMB in 10 patients who cleared with avoidance at review 3 months later. The most frequent location of rash included face, hands, vulval, and perianal region. Conclusions Our study confirms reports of increasing prevalence of SMB allergy. A detailed review of exposure in the prospective study showed that SMB is relevant in most patients, and 1% in petrolatum is the best concentration for patch testing.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 165
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What is the relevance of contact allergy to sodium metabisulfite and which concentration of the allergen should we use?
    Ralph, N.
    Verma, S.
    Merry, S.
    Lally, A.
    Kirby, B.
    Collins, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 171 : 131 - 132
  • [2] Sodium metabisulfite - a contact allergen?
    Madan, V.
    Beck, M. H.
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2009, 61 (01) : 58 - 58
  • [3] Sodium metabisulfite - a contact allergen?
    Aalto-Korte, Kristiina
    Suuronen, Katri
    Alanko, Kristiina
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2009, 60 (02) : 115 - U63
  • [4] Contact allergy to sodium metabisulfite: an occupational problem
    Kaaman, Ann-Catrin
    Boman, Anders
    Wrangsjo, Karin
    Matura, Mihaly
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2010, 63 (02) : 110 - 112
  • [5] Contact allergy to sodium sulfite and its relationship to sodium metabisulfite
    Oliphant, Thomas
    Mitra, Angana
    Wilkinson, Mark
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2012, 66 (03) : 128 - 130
  • [6] Sodium metabisulfite as a contact allergen - an example of a rare chemical mechanism for protein modification
    Roberts, David W.
    Basketter, David
    Kimber, Ian
    White, Jonathan
    McFadden, John
    White, Ian R.
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2012, 66 (03) : 123 - 127
  • [7] Should we use partial allergen sequence information for food allergy risk assessment?
    Goodman, R. E.
    Johnson, P. E.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2020, 75 : 118 - 118
  • [8] CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF CONTACT ALLERGY TO GOLD SODIUM THIOSULFATE
    BRUZE, M
    EDMAN, B
    BJORKNER, B
    MOLLER, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1994, 31 (04) : 579 - 583
  • [9] Carvone contact allergy: what are we missing?
    Wilmot, M. -C.
    Wakelin, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 183 : 163 - 163
  • [10] Contact Allergy in Atopic Patients: What We Suspected and What We Know
    Nardelli A.
    Consigli C.
    Bercik P.
    Wismer J.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Allergy, 2015, 2 (3) : 246 - 256