What Is the Relevance of Contact Allergy to Sodium Metabisulfite and Which Concentration of the Allergen Should We Use?

被引:17
|
作者
Ralph, Nicola [1 ]
Verma, Saroj [1 ]
Merry, Subha [1 ]
Lally, Aoife [1 ]
Kirby, Brian [1 ]
Collins, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Charles Ctr, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
DERMATITIS; SULFITE;
D O I
10.1097/DER.0000000000000120
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background The prevalence of contact allergy to sodium metabisulfite (SMB) has increased from the range of 1.4% to 1.7% to the range of 3.4% to 6.8% in published series over the past 20 years. Aims The aims of this study were to review contact allergy to SMB in our cohort and to investigate different concentrations to define the most appropriate concentration for patch testing. Methods Patient records were reviewed between February 2009 and December 2011 to obtain information on patient demographics, clinical presentation, and prevalence of contact allergy to SMB. Patients attending for patch testing, between January 2012 and June 2013, were tested with 3 strengths of SMB as part of the British standard series (1%, 0.1%, and 0.01%). Results Nine hundred ninety-six patients were patch tested to the British standard series including SMB 1% in petrolatum between February 2009 and June 2013, and 70 (7%) were positive. In the prospective group, 380 were tested to 3 concentrations of SMB (1.0%, 0.1%, and 0.01%). Fourteen patients (3.68%) had a positive patch test with 1% SMB, 7 to 0.1% SMB, and 3 to 0.01% SMB. There was exposure to SMB in 10 patients who cleared with avoidance at review 3 months later. The most frequent location of rash included face, hands, vulval, and perianal region. Conclusions Our study confirms reports of increasing prevalence of SMB allergy. A detailed review of exposure in the prospective study showed that SMB is relevant in most patients, and 1% in petrolatum is the best concentration for patch testing.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:162 / 165
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ultralow Concentration Sensing: What Should We Be Aware of?
    Masson, Jean-Francois
    ACS SENSORS, 2023, 8 (03) : 941 - 942
  • [22] Research on infertility: which definition should we use?
    Larsen, U
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (04) : 846 - 852
  • [23] Parenting Scale: Which Version Should We Use?
    Raziye Salari
    Cathrine Terreros
    Anna Sarkadi
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2012, 34 : 268 - 281
  • [24] WHICH COMPARATORS AND OUTCOMES MEASURES SHOULD WE USE?
    Hochberg, M. C.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 25 : S145 - S145
  • [25] EOG correction: Which regression should we use?
    Croft, RJ
    Barry, RJ
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) : 123 - 125
  • [26] Which proton pump inhibitor should we use?
    Williams, CN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 11 (01): : 29 - 29
  • [27] WHICH HEART-VALVES SHOULD WE USE
    TREASURE, T
    LANCET, 1990, 336 (8723): : 1115 - 1117
  • [28] Which measure of aggregate output should we use?
    Cheung, YW
    Fujii, E
    JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2000, 22 (02) : 253 - 269
  • [29] Which cardiovascular risk tables should we use?
    Masana, Lluis
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2007, 60 (07): : 690 - 692
  • [30] Multispectral coherence: Which decomposition should we use?
    Lyu, Bin
    Qi, Jie
    Li, Fangyu
    Hu, Ying
    Zhao, Tao
    Verma, Sumit
    Marfurt, Kurt J.
    INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2020, 8 (01): : T115 - T129