Methodology and applicability of the human contact burn injury model: A systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Springborg, Anders Deichmann [1 ]
Wessel, Caitlin Rae [2 ]
Andersen, Lars Peter Kloster [3 ]
Werner, Mads Utke [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Neurosci Ctr, Multidisciplinary Pain Ctr, Pain & Resp Support,Dept Anesthesia, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Physiol, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Lund, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACUTE INFLAMMATORY PAIN; RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST DEXTROMETHORPHAN; INDUCED SECONDARY HYPERALGESIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEAT INJURY; THERMAL-INJURY; HUMAN SKIN; MECHANICAL HYPERALGESIA; SENSITIZATION MODEL; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0254790
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The contact burn injury model is an experimental contact thermode-based physiological pain model primarily applied in research of drug efficacy in humans. The employment of the contact burn injury model across studies has been inconsistent regarding essential methodological variables, challenging the validity of the model. This systematic review analyzes methodologies, outcomes, and research applications of the contact burn injury model. Based on these results, we propose an improved contact burn injury testing paradigm. A literature search was conducted (15-JUL-2020) using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Sixty-four studies were included. The contact burn injury model induced consistent levels of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. However, the analyses revealed variations in the methodology of the contact burn injury heating paradigm and the post-burn application of test stimuli. The contact burn injury model had limited testing sensitivity in demonstrating analgesic efficacy. There was a weak correlation between experimental and clinical pain intensity variables. The data analysis was limited by the methodological heterogenicity of the different studies and a high risk of bias across the studies. In conclusion, although the contact burn injury model provides robust hyperalgesia, it has limited efficacy in testing analgesic drug response. Recommendations for future use of the model are being provided, but further research is needed to improve the sensitivity of the contact burn injury method. The protocol for this review has been published in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019133734).
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Allergic Contact Dermatitis After Prior Burn Injury
    Holmes, Maggie
    Tabba, Daim
    Mockbee, Chelsea S.
    Brodell, Robert T.
    Nahar, Vinayak K.
    JOURNAL OF THE DERMATOLOGY NURSES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 14 (05) : 238 - 239
  • [42] Improving prediction model systematic review methodology: Letter to the Editor
    Bullock, Garrett S.
    Hughes, Tom
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Callaghan, Michael J.
    Collins, Gary S.
    Riley, Richard D.
    TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (04) : 545 - 547
  • [43] A review of the evidence for threshold of burn injury
    Martin, N. A.
    Falder, S.
    BURNS, 2017, 43 (08) : 1624 - 1639
  • [44] Systematic review of microRNAs in human acute kidney injury
    Douvris, Adrianna
    Vinas, Jose L.
    Akbari, Shareef
    Tailor, Karishma
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Burger, Dylan
    Burns, Kevin D.
    RENAL FAILURE, 2024, 46 (02)
  • [45] Micronutrients After Burn Injury: A Review
    Nordlund, Megan J.
    Pham, Tam N.
    Gibran, Nicole S.
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 35 (02): : 121 - 133
  • [46] Human rights and the lack of guarantees for their applicability in the Peruvian reality. A systematic review
    Marquez Berrospi, Luis Miguel
    Ludena Gonzalez, Gerardo Francisco
    Cueva Quezada, Nilton Isaias
    REVISTA DE CLIMATOLOGIA, 2023, 23 : 1793 - 1801
  • [47] COSTS OF BURN CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Hop, M. J.
    Polinder, S.
    Middelkoop, E.
    van Baar, M. E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A606 - A606
  • [48] Costs of burn care: A systematic review
    Hop, M. Jenda
    Polinder, Suzanne
    van der Vlies, Cornelis H.
    Middelkoop, Esther
    van Baar, Margriet E.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2014, 22 (04) : 436 - 450
  • [49] Predicting survival in thermal injury: A systematic review of methodology of composite prediction models
    Hussain, Amer
    Choukairi, Fouzia
    Dunn, Ken
    BURNS, 2013, 39 (05) : 835 - 850
  • [50] A systematic review of road traffic injury studies in Iran: Methodology and prevention levels
    Sehat, Mojtaba
    Fakharian, Esmaeil
    Lotfi, Sajjad
    Nadi-Ravandi, Somayyeh
    Mahdian, Mehrdad
    Abedzadeh, Masoumeh
    Fazel, Mohammad Reza
    Sarbandi, Fahimeh
    Gheshlaghi, Leili Abedi
    ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (02) : 51 - 58