Methodology and applicability of the human contact burn injury model: A systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Springborg, Anders Deichmann [1 ]
Wessel, Caitlin Rae [2 ]
Andersen, Lars Peter Kloster [3 ]
Werner, Mads Utke [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Neurosci Ctr, Multidisciplinary Pain Ctr, Pain & Resp Support,Dept Anesthesia, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Physiol, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Lund, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACUTE INFLAMMATORY PAIN; RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST DEXTROMETHORPHAN; INDUCED SECONDARY HYPERALGESIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEAT INJURY; THERMAL-INJURY; HUMAN SKIN; MECHANICAL HYPERALGESIA; SENSITIZATION MODEL; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0254790
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The contact burn injury model is an experimental contact thermode-based physiological pain model primarily applied in research of drug efficacy in humans. The employment of the contact burn injury model across studies has been inconsistent regarding essential methodological variables, challenging the validity of the model. This systematic review analyzes methodologies, outcomes, and research applications of the contact burn injury model. Based on these results, we propose an improved contact burn injury testing paradigm. A literature search was conducted (15-JUL-2020) using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Sixty-four studies were included. The contact burn injury model induced consistent levels of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. However, the analyses revealed variations in the methodology of the contact burn injury heating paradigm and the post-burn application of test stimuli. The contact burn injury model had limited testing sensitivity in demonstrating analgesic efficacy. There was a weak correlation between experimental and clinical pain intensity variables. The data analysis was limited by the methodological heterogenicity of the different studies and a high risk of bias across the studies. In conclusion, although the contact burn injury model provides robust hyperalgesia, it has limited efficacy in testing analgesic drug response. Recommendations for future use of the model are being provided, but further research is needed to improve the sensitivity of the contact burn injury method. The protocol for this review has been published in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019133734).
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk prediction models for intensive care unit readmission: A systematic review of methodology and applicability
    Markazi-Moghaddam, Nader
    Fathi, Mohammad
    Ramezankhani, Azra
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 33 (04) : 367 - 374
  • [22] Standardization model for describing the extent of burn injury to human remains
    Glassman, DM
    Crow, RM
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 1996, 41 (01) : 152 - 154
  • [23] Metacognitive Treatment in Acquired Brain Injury and Its Applicability to Aphasia: A Systematic Review
    Wadams, Amanda
    Suting, Louisa
    Lindsey, Andre
    Mozeiko, Jennifer
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2022, 3
  • [24] Instruments to assess function or functionality in adults after a burn injury: A systematic review
    Itakussu, Edna Yukimi
    Morita, Andrea Akemi
    Kakitsuka, Emely Emi
    Pitta, Fabio
    Cavalheri, Vinicius
    Hernandes, Nidia Aparecida
    BURNS, 2021, 47 (05) : 999 - 1011
  • [25] Applications, opportunities, and challenges in using Telehealth for burn injury management: A systematic review
    Hayavi-Haghighi, Mohammad Hosein
    Alipour, Jahanpour
    BURNS, 2023, 49 (06) : 1237 - 1248
  • [26] Severe burn injury in europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality
    Nele Brusselaers
    Stan Monstrey
    Dirk Vogelaers
    Eric Hoste
    Stijn Blot
    Critical Care, 14
  • [27] Severe burn injury in europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality
    Brusselaers, Nele
    Monstrey, Stan
    Vogelaers, Dirk
    Hoste, Eric
    Blot, Stijn
    CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (05)
  • [28] Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Burn Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wu, Guosheng
    Xiao, Yongqiang
    Wang, Chen
    Hong, Xudong
    Sun, Yu
    Ma, Bing
    Wang, Guangyi
    Xia, Zhaofan
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2017, 38 (05): : 271 - 282
  • [29] Methodology of a systematic review
    Linares-Espinos, E.
    Hernandez, V.
    Dominguez-Escrig, J. L.
    Fernandez-Pello, S.
    Hevia, V.
    Mayor, J.
    Padilla-Fernandez, B.
    Ribal, M. J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2018, 42 (08): : 499 - 506
  • [30] METHODOLOGY OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Dennison, E. M.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 : S87 - S87